Those who become big things are also restrained and the opposing side debates their views! I am a fo

Updated on Game 2024-03-10
2 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Our view is that those who achieve great things are not informal. What does it mean to be "informal"? This is a very general concept, and in order to make the discussion more relevant, we naturally need to give a reasonable definition of it.

    The term "informal" comes from the Book of the Later Han Dynasty and the Biography of Yu Yan, and the Commercial Press's interpretation is to describe treating people without sticking to small things and not being constrained by small things. Mostly refers to not paying attention to the small things in life. There are two words here that need to be paid special attention to by the opposing debater:

    "Restraint" and "subsections". First of all, "detain" here means to be restrained, to describe being bound in. Obviously, not being rigid does not mean not paying attention and not complying.

    Not bound to subsections, let us do things more broadly and flexibly. Secondly, "subsections" refer to trivial matters that have nothing to do with the overall situation, non-principled trivialities. Its extension is very wide, as small as the trivial things of life:

    Dress and live; Big for self-interest: life and death. The great scientist Albert Einstein was unkempt all day long, which can be described as informal; The great writer Li Bai is uninhibited and uninhibited, which should be called informal; The great Comrade Lei Feng serves the people wholeheartedly, does not care about his own interests, and is even more informal!

    In addition, "subsections" are not the same as "details", which are the elements that make up things and are indispensable. Subsections are the secondary contradiction in the development of things, and to grasp the development of things, we should look at the direction and mainstream.

    So, why don't those who achieve great things be informal? We believe there are three reasons for this:

    First, from the perspective of the main characteristics of "those who have achieved great things". Those who have achieved great things are by no means ordinary talents. He must have made outstanding achievements in a certain field and had a large and lasting positive impact on society.

    Looking at the people who have achieved great things in ancient and modern times, we can find their common characteristics: (1) have a long-term vision, and have keen insight and foresight into the development of things; (2) They are good at grasping the main contradictions of things, can clarify the status and role of "subsections", and will not stick to unprincipled trivial matters; (3) Those who achieve great things often have unique personalities and are not informal. Comrade Xiaoping's thought on talent is mentioned:

    It is necessary to employ people on the basis of merit and ...... not informalIncluding some people with strange tempers (*** Anthology Volume II), which objectively affirms the relationship between talent and informality.

    Second, analyze from a realistic perspective. People's energy is limited, and if you want to achieve great things, you must have insight into the direction and grasp the overall situation. As the saying goes, it will be the top of the mountain, and the mountains will be small at a glance.

    Only when there are no distractions can we concentrate. If you stick to small sections, put your energy and time too much on non-principled trivial matters, and "grab your eyebrows and mustaches", it will inevitably hinder the success of big things.

    Third, from the theoretical level, the contradictions of things can be divided into main contradictions and secondary contradictions, and the "direction" and "overall situation" are the main contradictions of things, which play a leading role in the development of things; The "subsection" is a secondary contradiction. We cannot deal with problems at the expense of the basics.

    It is important to know that while the main contradiction is resolved, the secondary contradiction can also be easily solved. To sum up the above three points, we unanimously agree: those who achieve great things are not informal!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In general, the concluding argument should be concluded with a favorable point of view based on the previous debate.

    It is advisable to write down your own point of view and refute the other side's point of view during the debate.

    Closing arguments are not fixed in this way.

Related questions
3 answers2024-03-10

If you don't sweep a house, how can you sweep the world.

3 answers2024-03-10

Wang Guowei's"Three realms"Said has always been praised. He said:"Those who have become great careers and universities in ancient and modern times must pass through three realms: >>>More

2 answers2024-03-10

The original text is as follows: Those who have achieved great careers and university questions in ancient and modern times must pass through three realms. "Last night, the west wind withered the green trees, went up to the tall building alone, and looked at the end of the world", this first realm is also. >>>More

18 answers2024-03-10

No. 1 Xiao Snake People who belong to the snake may not be at the top of the rich list, but if it is a big thing, most of them are relatively calm in terms of personality. Because they are born with that sense of distress, people who belong to the snake know how to behave better than others. Snake people are calm and composed, always have a strong fighting spirit and spirit, they do not show off their talents, but secretly sharpen themselves and move forward step by step according to the plan. >>>More

5 answers2024-03-10

Wang Guowei talked about the experience of studying in his "Words of the World", he said: "Those who have achieved great careers and university questions in ancient and modern times must go through three realms: . . >>>More