What is your assessment of the stark contrast between the U.S. and China s?

In this case, we can not only see the impact of ** management, the different forms of government of the country; More importantly, we can feel the different responses of the population to the critical moment when group cohesion is needed.

First of all, for the early stage of the outbreak of the epidemic, China** has entered the stage of first-level alert and epidemic prevention when Wuhan first appeared as a precursor, the medical team from all over the world assisted Hubei, and Zhong Nanshan went out again, all of which expressed the importance that China attaches to this emergency. <>

However, in the United States**, the Trump team's actions in the early days of the pandemic fully demonstrated that they were not fully aware of the seriousness of the situation. When the epidemic initially affected the United States, Trump warned the masses not to panic, and the new crown pneumonia was just a "common cold". Mr. Trump's remarks are not simply due to his lack of awareness.

From the point of view of time, the epidemic in the United States is several months apart from China, and due to China's better handling of epidemic prevention and control in the early stage, the United States is unprepared for the arrival of the new crown pneumonia virus, which they did not expect.

At the same time, the opposition in the United States is still loud, which implicates the next reason why we want to be the first - that is, the special political system of the United States. Unlike the people's democratic dictatorship adopted by our country, the ruling party in the United States is constantly changing; **From two different political parties, representing the interests of different groups. And Donald Trump, the ruling Republican Party during the pandemic, his supporters and opponents naturally have different enforcement of orders from the federal**.

Even more unfortunate is that Trump** is calling for people to stop work and production due to public health impacts, and encourage people to go out and even return to school in order to grow the economy. As a result, the pro-Republican people and the Republican vote base have been more severely affected by the epidemic, and the public system has collapsed in New York and Texas.

Finally, the attitude of the public towards emergencies is also worth considering. During the epidemic, China has achieved an orderly home office and resumption of school, and the whole city has been closed. But some people in the United States seem to be unimpressed; Instead, they believe that the fact that they can't go out because of the pandemic restricts their personal freedom.

In addition, the recent police incident in the United States has led to a large number of people marching on the streets, which has also increased the difficulty of epidemic prevention. <>

So far, we can see the correct way to deal with sudden and urgent public health problems, as well as the many reasons for the major loopholes in the United States' epidemic prevention.

China's healthcare system is more robust than that of the United States. In the case of the response to the new coronavirus, it is more obvious that China's medical system is more sound than that of the United States, and I believe that the country can get better and better.

I think the management of ** and the consciousness of the people are very crucial. **Timely action has effectively controlled the spread of the epidemic. The increased awareness of self-protection among residents has also curbed the development of the epidemic.

It is at this special moment that the essence of the capitalist state is profoundly revealed. In the end, those who survive are the rich, and the poor are either in good health, or they can only resign themselves to fate.

This has to do with the fact that national policy is related to the country's leaders, the American state advocates freedom and pursues freedom, and capitalism leads to the pursuit of economic supremacy.

The U.S. has done so badly that it's a world of difference from China.

Significant advantages of China's system:

1. The value advantage of people first:

This anti-epidemic struggle has vividly embodied our party's position on the people and the fundamental value orientation of upholding the supremacy of the people, as well as the value advantage of upholding the supremacy of the people carried by the socialist system with Chinese characteristics.

2. The political advantages of the party's centralized and unified leadership

After the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, the epidemic prevention and control work with Comrade *** as the core quickly rose to the top priority and the most important work of the Party and the country, fully demonstrating the political advantages of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics in adhering to the centralized and unified leadership of the Party.

3. The joint advantage of a game of chess in the country:

In this epidemic prevention and control struggle, unified command, unified coordination, and unified scheduling, a prevention and control system of joint prevention and control, mass prevention and control, and mass prevention and control has been built, which fully reflects the joint advantages of the whole country.

4. Common cultural genes and values

One of the significant advantages of the system of socialism with Chinese characteristics is that it adheres to common ideals, beliefs, values, and moral concepts, carries forward the excellent traditional Chinese culture, revolutionary culture, and advanced socialist culture, and promotes the ideological and spiritual unity of all the people.

In the work of epidemic prevention and control, the majority of party members, cadres and the people continue the red tradition, inherit the revolutionary spirit, carry forward collectivism, carry forward the spirit of the times and patriotism, give up their small family for everyone, and have the courage to go against the grain.

5. Always for the people and rely on the people

Since the outbreak of the epidemic, we have always adhered to the people-centered, always regarded the protection of the lives and health of the people as the top priority, and did everything possible to increase the admission rate and the first rate, reduce the infection rate and fatality rate, save people's lives at all costs, and effectively solve the problems of people's production and life such as employment according to the impact of the epidemic on the production and life of the people.

In particular, the adoption of a comprehensive policy to focus on solving the livelihood problems of the people in difficulty fully demonstrates the value orientation and governing philosophy of the Communist Party of China (CPC) of putting the people first and our party's pure heart of worrying, loving, valuing and protecting the people.

This anti-epidemic struggle has demonstrated the superiority of our country's system, that is, to concentrate on major affairs, unify government decrees, and coordinate in an orderly manner.

The function of transmitting and creating culture. By preserving and transmitting the culture of human inventions, creations, ideas, beliefs, customs, and habits, the system is passed down from generation to generation and popularized in space. At the same time, the system promotes the accumulation and inheritance of culture, and promotes people to create new cultures.

The negative function of the system is that the established system often represents the traditional behavior pattern in society, which is prone to rigid and rigid tendencies, and is not easy to change in time with the development of the times, so that the social system plays a certain role in hindering individual behavior and social development. The function of the system can also be divided into explicit function and implicit function.

The explicit function is directly related to the purpose of the system, and the implicit function is the unintended result in the process of realizing the explicit function. For example, the explicit function of the education system is to impart knowledge and cultivate talents; The implicit function is to develop students' knowledge and ability to participate in group life.

1. The Party leads everything, and the Party flag is flying high on the front line of the fight against the epidemic, providing a strong political guarantee for the fight against the epidemic and demonstrating the political advantages of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics.

2. The whole country is playing a game of chess, with centralized leadership, unified command, national mobilization, and the formation of a joint force, demonstrating the institutional advantages of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics in concentrating forces to do major things.

From Wuhan to Hubei, from Hubei to the whole country, under the unified command, unified coordination, and unified scheduling, the socialist system has released a strong leadership ability, response ability, organization and mobilization ability, and implementation ability, which has been transformed into governance efficiency when dealing with strong winds and waves and resisting risks and challenges.

illustrates the wide divergence in human rights policies and philosophies.

Our country is truly people-oriented.

We will spare no effort to help the infected.

In contrast, capitalist countries.

That is to say one thing and do another.

The mouth is full of benevolence, righteousness and morality.

In action, it is mercenary.

so as to ignore human rights.

Different national conditions naturally have different performances, and the two are incomparable.

China and the United States have taken different approaches to fighting the pandemic, which is due to the great differences between the two countries in terms of politics, economy, culture, etc.

First of all, China's anti-epidemic policy is based on collectivism and the concept of dominance, and a series of measures have been taken to control the spread of the epidemic, including the implementation of lockdown measures, the isolation of infected people, contact tracing, etc. These measures have effectively contained the spread of the epidemic and** provided strong support and protection during the epidemic.

In contrast, the U.S. anti-epidemic policy is more focused on individual freedom and private interests. The United States** has taken some measures during the pandemic to encourage people to practice social distancing and protect themselves, but these measures have not fully worked as expected. At the same time, the U.S.**'s economic and social interventions during the pandemic have also been criticized, with some arguing that the measures were too slow and loose.

Second, China's anti-epidemic policy is based on effective management and control. During the epidemic, China has taken a series of measures to improve efficiency, strengthen management, and control the spread of the epidemic, and these measures have effectively curbed the spread of the epidemic. In contrast, the U.S. anti-epidemic policy focuses more on the freedom of the market and individuals, and its intervention in the economy during the pandemic has been criticized, with some arguing that the measures are too slow and loose.

Finally, China's anti-epidemic policy is based on the importance of public health security. During the epidemic, China** has taken a series of measures to improve public health security, including strengthening the construction of the medical and health system, strengthening epidemic monitoring and early warning, and strengthening epidemic prevention publicity and education. These measures have effectively improved public health safety and provided strong support and security during the pandemic.

In contrast, the U.S. anti-epidemic policy is more focused on individual freedom and private interests. The United States** has taken some measures during the pandemic to encourage people to practice social distancing and protect themselves, but these measures have not fully worked as expected. At the same time, the U.S.**'s economic and social interventions during the pandemic have also been criticized, with some arguing that the measures were too slow and loose.

In conclusion, China and the United States have taken different approaches to fighting the pandemic, which is due to the great differences between the two countries in terms of politics, economy, culture, etc. While both China and the United States have taken some measures to deal with the pandemic, the effectiveness and impact of these measures vary widely.

Western countries are too lenient in democratization, when such a situation needs to mobilize the power of the whole country to prevent the outbreak of the epidemic, like the United States is a federal country, if the United States is compared to a company, the United States is composed of 50 states, each state governor is a shareholder, the federal ** is the executive general manager, each state governor as a shareholder, has his own thoughts, his own ideas to govern, can resist the federal ** policy, such as the governor of New York publicly angry Trump, saying that he did not act at the beginning of the epidemic, And in China it is simply unimaginable.

The United States can't help it, because the people will not cooperate, and the ** department is not very active in fighting the epidemic.

The prevention and control of the epidemic has further reminded the world that the international community is a community with a shared future. The facts of the global pandemic have once again proved that in the era of globalization, the general secretary's assertion that human beings live in the global village and that the fate of all countries is closely related, and that it is a community of "you have me, and I have you" is extremely correct.

In 2020, a sudden new crown pneumonia epidemic hit the land of China. Although it is impossible to confirm the true source and intermediate host of the new coronavirus, the raging spread of the novel coronavirus has not been divided into regions, borders, or systems, and the targets of the novel coronavirus have not been distinguished by nationality, skin color, or wealth, and have quickly become a public health emergency in the world. As of March 14, China has a total of 81,048 confirmed cases of new crown pneumonia, and 73,908 cases of new crown pneumonia have been confirmed in more than 120 countries abroad.

Italy, Iran, South Korea, Spain, France, Germany, the United States and other countries have become the hardest hit by the epidemic after China.

The facts of the global pandemic have once again proved that in the era of globalization, human beings live in the global village, and the fate of all countries is closely related, and the thesis that it is a community of "you have me, I have you" is extremely correct, and the awareness of respecting nature, conforming to nature, and protecting nature is very important, and it is very necessary to do a good job in ecological construction, adhere to green development, and protect the concept of human homeland, and it is very important to build a community with a shared future for mankind that is durable peace, universal security, common prosperity, openness, inclusiveness, clean and beautiful.

Looking back at the international community's response to major epidemics and the trajectory of the pandemic since the beginning of this century, the awareness of a community with a shared future for mankind needs to be raised urgently.

Since the outbreak of the epidemic, China** has adhered to the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind, and is responsible not only for the safety and health of its own people, but also for the cause of global public health. In an open, transparent and responsible manner, China has actively carried out international cooperation in the fight against the epidemic, and through active comprehensive non-drug interventions, it has been very effective in cutting off the transmission route of the virus, which has bought time for the world to fight the epidemic.

China has isolated the new crown strain in a very short period of time and made it public to the world, provided testing reagents and anti-epidemic materials to Japan, South Korea, Iran, Pakistan, Italy and other countries and some countries in Africa that are not very capable of fighting new crown pneumonia, and has shared a number of technical documents such as epidemic prevention and control and diagnosis and treatment plans with more than 100 countries and more than 10 international and regional organizations around the world, and sent expert medical teams to many countries.

Reality once again tells people that "the mountains and rivers are exotic, the wind and the moon are the same sky", and in this war without gunsmoke, the people of the world stand together with the Chinese people. In the face of the challenges of global issues, no country can retreat into a self-enclosed island, and it is difficult for a single country to stand alone.