Economic Law Masters Topic Wow Thank you

1. Input tax = 50,000 * 13% + 400 * 7% = 65,282, output tax = (65,000 + (585 1 + 17%)) 17% = 11,135 (freight is an off-price cost, and the off-price cost and the deposit of overdue packaging are regarded as tax-included prices).

3. Output tax = 400 000 * 17% + 3000 * 7% = 682104, input tax = 30000 * 17% = 5100

5. The purchase of self-use cars is not eligible for tax deduction.

1. The concept of economic law:

Economic law is an economic law formed by adjusting the state's macroeconomic regulation and control of economic activities.

A general term for the legal norms of relationships.

Economic law has three basic meanings: economic law belongs to the category of law and belongs to the system of domestic law, but it is different from the other departments of law in the domestic law system.

2. Objects of adjustment of the economic law:

The object of adjustment of economic law is specific economic relations, not all economic relations, still less other social relations other than economic relations. Although the relationship of property donation and property inheritance is an economic relationship, it does not fall within the scope of the adjustment object of the economic law; Economic-legal relations and personal relations are not economic relations, let alone within the scope of the objects of economic law adjustment.

3. The status of economic law:

Economic law is an independent department of law, because the object of its adjustment has a specific scope, and it only regulates the economic relations that occur in the process of the state coordinating the operation of its own economy, and the object of its adjustment can be separated from the object of adjustment of other sectoral laws.

Economic law is an important department of law, and its important role is mainly manifested in the following aspects:

1. Adhere to the common development of the economy with public ownership as the main body and multiple ownership systems;

2. Guide, promote and guarantee the establishment and improvement of the socialist market economic system;

3. Expand foreign economic and technological exchanges and cooperation;

4. Ensure the sustained, rapid and healthy development of the national economy.

Fourth, the system of economic law:

The system of economic law is a unified whole composed of multi-level and complete economic law departments. It is generally accepted that the system of economic law should be structured as follows:

1. Enterprise Organization Management Law;

2. Market Management Law.

3. Macroeconomic regulation and control method.

4. Social Security Law.

Chapter I: Competition Law.

The Competition Law consists of three laws: the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, the Auction Law, and the Tendering and Bidding Law. Compared with the three, the Anti-Unfair Competition Law is more important.

In the 2004 bar examination, the latter two did not appear in the question, while the Anti-Unfair Competition Law issued a three-point question).

First of all, this is a question of property law and not economic law, and the answer is as follows:

1. The legality of A's act of selling two cows to C depends on the proportion of A's capital contribution, the old cow is purchased by two people, and the remaining three cows belong to the fruits of the old heifer, and the relationship between A and B to the four cows belongs to the joint ownership relationship, if A's capital contribution ratio exceeds the proportion of the value of the two cattle sold to the total value of the four cows, then the act of selling the cow is legal, if it is lower than the proportion of the cattle sold to the total value of the four cows, the excess part is invalid.

2. C can of course obtain the ownership of these two cows, if A has the right of disposition, the legal basis is the ownership system, and if A does not enjoy the full right of disposition, then the legal basis is the bona fide acquisition system.

3. No, because based on the legal basis set out in 2, the two cows are already owned by C, and B can only hold A accountable if he wants to assert his rights.

4. C should bear the responsibility, because this is a tort caused by raising animals, and the law stipulates that the owner or manager of the animal shall bear the responsibility, and C is the owner of the old heifer should bear this responsibility.

5. If B wants the cattle, then it is decided that B and C continue to perform the sales contract, and B pays a reasonable consideration to C, and if B does not want to pay the consideration, the cattle are owned by C, and if B has any objection to the ownership of the cattle, inform him to sue A in a separate case.