Let s talk about whether you should have a second child under great economic pressure?

I think you should not think about it for the time being, because your financial pressure is high, and after proving that your second child is born, you can't pay for the tuition fees after milk powder diapers, buying a house and a car, etc., you have a very hard life, and the child is also very hard, so I think you should not have a second child first.

If you feel that you can't solve this financial burden for a long time, then you can not have children, and if the problem is only short-lived, you can consider having a second child.

I don't think it's okay to ask for it for the time being, because having a second child will inevitably have a big impact on your life, and your wife will no longer be able to continue working, and the financial pressure will be even greater.

It is recommended not to ask for it, you think that you are not having a good time, and you are looking forward to how good you can give your child.

I don't think so, if you don't have enough financial ability, and you can't afford to give him a good enough life after having a second child, it's better not to give birth to a child.

In the case of high economic pressure, I don't think you should have a second child, because raising a child must have sufficient conditions, and it must be careful and careful, and you can't settle for it or rush it.

I think that in the case of high economic pressure, you should not have a second child, because the cost of having a second child will also increase, and the economy cannot support your large expenses, which will cause a lot of contradictions.

For example, like our family, now they are all working-class, Dabao still has to go to school, and the elderly on both sides are raised by us, due to the pressure of reality, we must not consider a second child, if you want a second child, eating will be a problem.

I don't think I should have it. I think that during this period of time, because of the great financial pressure and the series of having children, it is very expensive, and I feel that since I choose to give birth, I should be responsible for him.

I don't think it should be, because now the social pressure is high, and then the economy is also tight, and it is already very difficult to raise one.

No, first of all, you can't even meet the most basic material foundation of your child, what should you do if your child has money for milk powder, diapers, and school money in the future? It's better to think about it.

It is not recommended that you have a second child, and you can consider this issue again when your financial situation is better.

I think if you really want a second child, then hurry up and give birth, after all, the economic pressure will be even greater in the future.

Don't think that after the negative population growth, the pressure on employment will be reduced, and in fact, at least in the next 10 years, the pressure on employment will be very great. Because negative population growth has only started now, and when this group of people enters society, it will be at least 10 years or more.

If you look at the number of junior high school students in 2021, there will be an increase of 10,000 compared to before, and you will calculate that there will be 3 years of junior high school, 3 years of high school, and 4 years of college, so in the next 10 years, the labor force will still be relatively abundant.

People who started in the 80s will have significantly higher pension pressure than those born in the 60s and 70s, not only because of delayed retirement, but also because of pensions. When the post-80s generation began to retire, it was just the time when the population and labor force were decreasing.

Recently, it has been proposed to increase the fertility rate by shortening the length of education in order to solve the problem of declining fertility. But this approach doesn't solve the problem. ......The reason for this is that the decision to have children depends on one's will, the cost of childbearing directly affects fertility, and there is no direct link between education time and fertility.

Whether to have children or not depends not on economic conditions, but on whether the husband and wife have reached a consensus to give their children a stable future and growth environment. Men and women who struggle with whether or not to have children because of difficult living conditions are actually very responsible parents and should be recognized and praised. How so?

The former is a hundred times stronger than those who give birth without thinking about the future at will. Children are not cats and dogs, and they can't come and go as soon as they want. Many children are abandoned and given away, and many children experience the pain of family breakdown when they are minors, all of which are caused by the irresponsibility of their parents.

As a qualified adult, after giving birth to a child, you must support and educate, and you can't let your child suffer harm from an early age, and you can't leave it alone to add a burden to the lack of social prosperity.

A child's experience of happiness is not about being rich or poor, but about whether they can be cared for by their parents. Young people who have just started a family may be very average if they have no financial conditions, and they feel that they cannot provide a comfortable living environment for their children and hesitate to have children.

In fact, if the relationship between the husband and wife is stable, the life goal is clear, having children is a natural thing, financial difficulties are only temporary, as long as you work hard, everything will change. However, the risk of blindly waiting until the economy improves to have children is that the economic conditions are better but the physical conditions are declining, and missing the best childbearing age is just as cruel to the children!