-
The point is that the rules of the International Badminton Federation are not reasonable, which leads to the use of losing tactics in order to avoid encountering strong opponents too early in the knockout round or avoiding playing in the same room. The second is that tactics are tactics, but it may be that the two empty athletes play too fake, and they will be withdrawn. The main reason is the problem of the competition system, there is no way, it is just that the athletes have been wronged.
After many years of hard work, they can only look forward to the 2016 Olympics.
-
It was a dirty game. After the game, I searched for tweets near Wembley Stadium on Twitter, and the most I saw was such a complaint, and looking back on the game at that time, fans also invariably said that they only regretted that they did not make a bigger boo at that time, "failed to stomp their feet and shake the stands", because, Yu Yang, Wang Xiaoli and Zheng Jingyin, Jin Ha Na's game was never a "win" game, and the purpose of both sides was "to lose" from the beginning.
In this London Olympics, the International Badminton Federation divided the game into two parts: the group stage and the knockout round, and after the group stage, the cross-elimination round will be carried out according to the record - before Wang Xiaoli and Yu Yang started the game, the Chinese badminton team's other pair of women's doubles pairs, Tian Qing Zhao Yunlei, unexpectedly lost to the Danish pair Wright Petersen, so they had to rank second in the group - according to the schedule, if Yu Yang Wang Xiaoli wins the South Korean combination, he will qualify first in the group, Then the two Chinese players will most likely meet in the semi-finals, and there will be only one Chinese pair in the final.
In order to avoid meeting their teammates in advance, Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli finally chose a negative match - in the match against the Korean pair of Jung Kyung-eun and Kim Ha-na, the pair of target champions frequently made outrageous mistakes such as serving and going to the net and returning the ball out of bounds. What's even more ironic is that in order to let the Chinese players meet in advance, the Korean combination also made a good calculation to lose the game early in the morning - at the beginning of the game, the two sides did not have a real competition, but directly began to compete who made a mistake faster and more, such a scene also made the audience in an uproar, whistles, boos, cheers and applause everywhere, and even forced the game supervisors to enter the field to warn the athletes on both sides not to play negatively.
-
Serious contempt for match-fixing.
-
The gold medal of this session is not high; "Zhengwei Cultural Communication" wishes the 2012 London Olympics a complete success!
-
1.If you win this game, you will directly pk your home country in the next game, which will lead to the inability to win the gold and silver medals.
2.The British Olympic Committee deliberately added more games in these games, and in order to let the British badminton team enter the final, the country wanted to save its strength in the next game, but was disqualified.
3.In order to prevent the Chinese from winning the gold and silver medals, if China wins this game, it will play against China in the next game, and it will not be able to win the gold and silver medals, and the British Olympic Committee deliberately prepared redundant games and postponed the final.
-
It is said that the game is meaningless, purely superfluous, and the United Kingdom wants to have a few more games and is newly added...
And everyone wants to maintain some physical strength for the next game...
According to my personal thoughts, the British Olympic Committee is purely brain-dead, and this year they are brain-dead!
-
The top two in each group qualify, these two Chinese players can get the first place in the group if they win the last group stage against the pair of South Korea's players, and the knockout stage after the group stage is a cross-match, then they will encounter the second place in the other group and another Chinese player, in order to avoid their own people meeting in the knockout round too early, or to increase the probability of the Chinese team winning the gold and silver medals, so the Chinese players chose to lose deliberately. The Chinese team only made reasonable use of the rules of the game, and Westerners still looked at the Chinese with colored glasses, and afterwards gave a "negative game" excuse to cancel the Chinese team's game, and had to feel sorry for the Chinese players.
-
The Chinese team does not want to meet in advance in the final, and foreign countries do not want to touch the Chinese team.
-
As the other pair of the Chinese team, Tian Qing and Zhao Yunlei, won the second place in Group D of the group stage with 3 wins and 2 wins, their first opponent in the knockout round will be Chinese Taipei's Cheng Wenxin and Jian Yujin combination, if they can defeat their opponents and enter the next round, then they will usher in the winner between the first place in Group A and the second place in Group C, that is, if the Chinese player Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli in Group A defeat the Korean pair Zheng Jingyin and Kim Ha Na in tonight's match, then Yu Yang Wang Xiaoli will take the first place in Group A, in this way, these two teams of Chinese players are equivalent to being divided into the same half, which means that the Chinese team will "kill each other" in advance before the final, which is what head coach Li Yongbo does not want to see. Of course, in this way, the Chinese badminton women's doubles will realize the possibility of winning the gold and silver medals.
Now, Chinese players Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli "successfully" lost the game and finished second in the group, so that they avoided Tian Qing and Zhao Yunlei and were divided into the bottom half, and the possibility of meeting before the final became 0.
The same is true for South Korea, who need to win this match to finish top of their group and qualify for the knockout rounds, so that they can avoid their other pair and avoid a cannibalistic rivalry in the final.
-
The hateful International Badminton Federation has long had this bug in the rules formulated, that is, it has not been corrected, so that for many years, in order to avoid strong opponents in the next round, deliberately lost the game. This is an unspoken rule that has been developed over the years, and the International Badminton Federation should be aware of it, but it has been slow to patch it. The impact of the sudden attack on the much-anticipated Olympic Games is still very large.
I hope it can be conducive to the healthy development of badminton.
-
It is said that badminton has changed the competition system, and it is said that if Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli win, they will meet another Chinese combination in the semifinals, and South Korea does not want to touch another Chinese combination, afraid of coming down in the semifinals.
-
Circumvent the format and meet your opponent in the knockout round.
-
This is a matter of group strategy, in order to avoid a strong enemy.
-
What happens if you don't play negatively......Is there anyone who understands to come out and explain, it is best to detail that the first in Group A and the second in Group D will be in the top half of the knockout round, if the two pairs successfully break through the quarter.
-
Just once. On the evening of July 31, 2012, in the badminton women's doubles competition of the London Olympics, the Chinese women's doubles group A combination Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli were accused of negative competition and were disqualified from the Olympics.
-
1.Yes, it must be arranged, athletes won't do thatIt's all negative play.
3.It is true that in order to win the championship and runner-up, China deliberately lost in order to avoid another team of Chinese players in the knockout round.
4.The combination of Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli was canceled, and one team was not disqualified and finally won the championship.
-
In order to avoid playing against players from their own country.
-
Yes, in order to avoid playing against players from your own country. It's a shame ...
-
There is still a problem with the competition system, and it should be changed.
-
Because the Chinese pair Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli have already qualified, in order to avoid encountering another group of players from their country too early, they are suspected of deliberately losing to the South Korean pair Zheng Jingyin and Kim Ha Na. This is the famous London badminton negative match incident.
This move also caused the South Korean and Indonesian pairs to perform extremely negatively in the subsequent match, and the bad impact caused unanimous condemnation from the fans present. On the evening of August 1, the International Badminton Federation finally made a final judgment in response to the negative competition of eight badminton women's doubles players including Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli and deliberately conceding the ball.
After repeated discussions and confirmation at the hearing and the Badminton Federation, the Chinese pair Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli were disqualified from the London Olympics along with three other pairs, paying a heavy price for the act of "tacit ball".
-
Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli, as the world's No. 1 combination, frequently made "mistakes" against the South Korean team in order to avoid encountering another Chinese pair, so that they must destroy a pair and cannot enter the finals, which is not good for China.
In the final match of Group A of the badminton women's doubles group stage at the London Olympics, the world's No. 1 Chinese pair Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli lost to the South Korean pair Zheng Jingyin and Kim Ha Na 14:21 and 11:21.
After the competition, the IOC and the International Badminton Federation investigated as soon as possible. The BWF issued an announcement on the disqualification of four pairs of Olympic women's doubles players for suspected negative matches. The BWF announced that the players who participated in the Olympic badminton women's doubles competition were disqualified by the BWF.
-
The rules have been changed, the Chinese team may collide with their own family if they win, and the South Korean team is the same, so it is passive to deal with it, paying attention to the so-called "strategy", which is obviously against the Olympic spirit and is a mistake, which is undoubtedly undoubted, even the Chinese must not "protect the calf", on the other hand, this is not fair to the audience who spend money to buy tickets. The London Olympic Committee's punishment of this undesirable phenomenon can be regarded as maintaining the appearance of the Olympic Games.
-
You can win it by relying on the strength of Chinese badminton, but if you win, you will play against your own country, all on behalf of China, what's the point of comparing each other, don't let others see jokes and say that they kill each other. I think that's why the London Olympic Committee didn't set the rules of the game, and that kind of punishment seems a bit excessive.
-
Avoid crashes. This year, the rules have been changed again, in order to avoid all the medals being won by China, so the first place in the group has to catch the match, so the first place in that game will be avoided.
-
The rules of the competition are seriously unreasonable and violate the principle of fairness of the competition. It makes the powerful players lose medals, and the weak players get nothing. Vile!
-
The football group stage has been qualified, I have to rest in the last round, I don't give my best, why should I be disqualified.
-
London, I beg you not to lose face anymore Extinguishing the flame and moving the cauldron Confusing North and South Korea many times The national anthem played by the champion raising the flag was actually out of tune The verdict was changed six times in 3 days and cash was collected At the age of 17, he broke the record and won the championship because he ate doping that could not be detected Flying for a long time is because he took doping The bronze medal that rots when he falls can't buy a kilogram of pork How many controversies have been created in the first six days of the competition, and how many oolongs have been made What is the value of such an Olympic Games? What badminton world garbage stuff, go and see how FIFA doesn't talk about these people who don't play with all their strength, and how does FIBA not care about the negative games of garbage time. The two pens of the Olympic Committee are scared.
Who would be so hard-working, what's wrong with retaining strength.
-
Use the rules to dodge strong opponents.
-
There are loopholes in the rules of this kind of competition, which is obviously unreasonable, and it is impossible to avoid the opponents of the same country from meeting each other, and therefore it is impossible to avoid negative play. Disqualifying the competition is too low IQ!!
I think adding a rule would solve this problem perfectly. That is, in a match, the winning team has the right to control the points of the round, either to keep the points for themselves or to throw them to the opponent.
The advantages of this are: 1. Not afraid of unspoken rules. In a game that the whole world is watching, if you dare to give points to other teams, then don't go back home.
2. Improve the strategic level of the game, not just the tactics. Points dominance is a good thing, and if you use it well, you can make several teams on the other side kill each other, and you can also avoid your own side from meeting early. At this time, the wins and losses of one game will be closely related to the other, and it will be more controllable.
3. Improve the enthusiasm of the players in the game, play with all their might, and make the game more exciting. Whether you want points or not, you have to grab the dominance so that you don't have to worry about negative matches and the crowd can feast their eyes. And even if you meet your own players, you can play to your heart's content, even if you can't get points because of the coach's arrangement, but you still prove yourself by winning the game.
-
The badminton format was originally a knockout tournament, but it still failed to challenge the supremacy of most Asian powerhouses. As a member of Europe, the British Olympic Organizing Committee has created more opportunities for itself by weakening some strong teams in the badminton world, including the Chinese team, through the group stage is a "strong matchup". In order to avoid a "strong showdown" and avoid "playing in the same room", China allows athletes to play match-fixing.
This is not simply "shameless", "smearing the country" and "sorry for the audience", but a dispute between the interests and honor of the two major groups. Athletes are just chess pieces, but they have to exchange 4 years of sweat and the risk of banning, and they have to drown ...... with the saliva of the people of the motherlandPlease also read more news and remarks and treat them sensibly. When Tian Ji races horses, he replaces the order of the superior and inferior horses to win, and British athletes will also use "crashing to win gold", which is the game on the field.
It is not uncommon to avoid risks and wait for the opportunity to rise again through some means, and the essence is the same. What does it mean to be "against the Olympic spirit"?
Because last year the International Badminton Federation updated the rules that it is not the original format that can go all the way to the final, but adopts a similar group format, so there will be an early qualification, and then another match does not need to be won. In order to preserve its strength, it is normal for the Chinese team to lose. However, the Badminton Federation said that it was match-fixing, which was a system problem.
Old Mu Yu was recruiting relatives for his daughter Mu Guiying, he first took out the whip and showed his kung fu, and Mu Guiying came to the stage after the sound of gongs and drums. Wang Si, who killed the pig, took the lead in the stage competition, Mu Guiying didn't want the people to fake the fight, the two compared fists and feet first, and only one kick Wang Si was kicked over, he was not Mu Guiying's opponent at all. >>>More
The morning should be suitable for a more gentle exercise, badminton is a bit intense, and jogging in the morning is more suitable. >>>More
Zhang Ning. On the evening of August 19, Beijing time, the women's singles final of the Athens Olympic Games was held at the Goodi Olympic Center, with the No. 2 seed and 29-year-old Chinese player Zhang Ning facing the No. 4 seed Zhang Haili of the Netherlands. Zhang Haili advanced to the final after knocking out No. 1 seed Gong Ruina of China in the semifinals. >>>More
Personally, I think that the Badminton Federation has joined the group stage this time, and the group stage and the knockout stage have their own advantages and disadvantages, and I can't simply say who is good and who is bad. The new rules were previously announced, and all athletes are the same. But there is another rule that cannot be violated, which is negative play, the so-called match-fixing. >>>More