On the certainty of whatabouts

Combined with the actual situation, experience more things, dare to analyze things, and you will naturally understand, but it is useless to look at it and see it. Go to reality, walk around, think.

What about a certain philosophical basis? Basically, those who have a master's degree or less in the Faculty of Philosophy do not need to study.

The Treatise on Logical Philosophy is Wittgenstein's major work in the early period and is one of the most important works of analytic philosophy (the main work in the later period is Philosophical Investigations). Overall, this is a very academic book, and it is completely unsuitable for people outside of the profession. If you have to read it, you should first study philosophy on your own and reach a professional level.

Most philosophical systems are only correct in the eyes of their creators, completely wrong in the eyes of later philosophers, and half-truths and fallacies in the eyes of ordinary people. In his later years, Wittgenstein said: "There is no such thing as philosophy, but only a grammatical misunderstanding."

And as I understand him, he's just a gay, eccentric, lonely man. His philosophical ideas are not clearly expressed in the language of his books, he is a person who does not know how to organize his own language, and he himself is confused.

Read it as fast as you can, then set it aside. Then pay more attention in daily life, and you will find that many things can be related to the content of the book, and when you have some understanding, you will read it a second time, and this time you will find that what you didn't understand becomes much clearer. After a while, I will read it a third time, and this time I will read it intensively, because I believe that by this time you already have a certain understanding of the book.

If you can't read it, it's for sure, and it's the same with a master's degree or above, so you can let a doctor who is engaged in German classics give it a try. Of course, you can read it, but the key is what can you experience after reading? If you don't experience anything, it means that you are far from professional. Philosophy is not popular science.

If you don't understand it, put it aside for a while, find a philosophical dictionary and read it first.

I don't know what stage the landlord has studied philosophy.,This book is generally a "backbone" to specialize in.。。 This book was compiled by others after his death, which is more difficult (mainly because there is no certain coherent system, and they are all quotations that seem fragmented), I can't understand it directly at first, so it is recommended to read some introductory books first (such as the introduction in the history of philosophy), here is a brief explanation: The key is to understand the difference between this book and the "artificial language" ("Treatise on Logical Philosophy") in his earlier thoughts, "Treatise on Logical Philosophy" is mainly deconstruction, making philosophy a linguistic problem, and philosophy must face language," Everything that can be said can be said clearly, and everything that cannot be said should be silenced", philosophy is nothing more than to make the problem clear.

Philosophical Studies" is a book that emphasizes everyday language, language games, and theories. It is to move from epistemology to the philosophy of language, and to return philosophy to philosophy, and after deconstruction, it is construction. It is impossible to create a strict language that can express philosophy, because the language of everyday life is endless, which is the foundation and source of philosophy, so the essence of philosophy should be solved in everyday life, and the game should be understood in the "game".