Legal issues! Urgent! Legal Questions! Hurry up online and wait!

Updated on psychology 2024-02-25
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    You can ask him for a certain amount of compensation. The property rights of the house are subject to the registration on the real estate certificate. Since the title deed of this house has the names of both of you written on it, the house is currently owned by both of you.

    Also, since the two of you are not registered to be married, the house is not part of the joint property. So you can ask him to pay a certain amount of compensation if you give up the right to the property.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    According to what you said, my analysis is as follows: although the house is the name of two people, the house is ready to get married, that is to say, the house is co-owned with conditions, that is, marriage, now you are not married, and you have not contributed a penny, so the conditions are not fulfilled, naturally you have no right to claim the house.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Let's talk about it briefly, because seeing the results of the two above divergence.

    I don't think your argument for a house is also valid, because first of all, you have to understand that if you are not married, you can't talk about the issue of joint property. The man can claim that the names of the two people on the house certificate are based on the possibility that you can get married, but now that the relationship between the two parties has broken down and they are not married, the names of the two people on the house certificate cannot prove anything. The payment and repayment of the house are all made by the man, so naturally the ownership of the house should belong to one person.

    If you do have grievances, you can submit **evidence** (there must be evidence) to claim compensation, but if it is only on the grounds of "wasting feelings", the court will definitely not, because this is a "you love me" thing...

    Anyway, that's the case.,It's more likely that girls will lose when they fall in love.,After all, there's too much investment.,Too much loss.。。。

    Sympathize with it, but it's useless at the legal level...

    Even if you think that you are a co-owner, and it is true that the property certificate legally proves that you are a co-owner, but you cannot prove that your reasonable income can pay for the down payment and installment repayment of the house, it is still not possible, and the law is ultimately about evidence

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    You don't have to think about the house anymore. Give up. End the suffering sooner.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    If he files a lawsuit with the court to confirm that the house is owned by him, he can prove that all the purchase money was paid by him, but you cannot prove that you paid the money and you are not married, according to the law, the court will support his claim.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    1. Buying and selling relationship, lien, mortgage, pledge, product liability, and tort, these are pretty much the same.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Hello, the answer is as follows:

    1. The civil legal relationships involved include sales contract relationship, contract contract relationship, lien relationship, loan contract relationship, mortgage relationship and pledge relationship.

    2. It is a self-help behavior and is legal.

    3. It is a pledge and legal.

    4. It belongs to liuzhi and is legal.

    5. Mainly for the road administration department, and the secondary is A. Because the accident occurred mainly because the road administration department did not deal with the manhole cover properly, but at the same time, it was A's behavior that caused B's injury, so the responsibility was shared but there was a priority.

    6. The mortgage contract is established, and the mortgage is established, because the chattel mortgage does not need to be registered.

    7. The pledge contract is established, and the pledge right is established, because the delivery of the movable property pledge shall prevail.

    8. D, as the pledgee, should properly keep the pledged property and should bear the liability for compensation for the improper custody of the property.

    9. A can claim compensation from the highway department. Whoever is responsible for the manhole cover is responsible.

    10. A may claim damages for breach of contract and tort liability. The former is based on a contractual relationship of sale and purchase, and the latter is based on personal injury.

    To be continued、、、

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Sorry, the text is not legible.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    1. A case of serious injury is a major criminal case, and it is necessary to sentence a sentence of between 3 and 10 years in prison, and such a case cannot be "private", because this kind of criminal behavior has affected the stability of the country and society, and the state must come forward to crack down, that is, the procuratorate will file a "public prosecution" with the court. Of course, the fact that the parties are "private" means that the parties have reached an agreement on civil compensation, and the court will consider it as a mitigating circumstance when sentencing.

    2. If the compensation is not in place, it can be enforced by the court after the court judgment or mediation. If the fixed property is not necessary for living and living, the court can enforce it for compensation.

    3. Civil servants who are subject to criminal punishment shall be dismissed. Because a person who has been criminally punished is no longer allowed to serve as a civil servant.

    4. The transfer of real estate after the accident is a malicious transfer, which may not be effective, and the court may fine and detain the malicious transferee when it is executed.

    5. Because the real estate certificate has not been issued, the transfer procedures cannot be handled after the transfer. China's property law stipulates that the transfer of immovable property must be registered, otherwise it will not take legal effect.

    6. If the people's court finds that the mortgaged house is the only property where the defendant lives at the time of enforcement, it will not auction it. Otherwise, it can be auctioned, and the compensation can be paid with the auction price.

    Attached: Civil Servants Law of the People's Republic of China

    Article 24: The following persons shall not be hired as civil servants:

    1) Those who have previously received criminal punishment for a crime;

    Property Law of the People's Republic of China

    Article 9 The creation, alteration, transfer and extinction of real estate rights shall take effect upon registration in accordance with law; Without registration, it shall not take effect, unless otherwise provided by law.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    When you buy a car with a mortgage, the car is mortgaged to the bank, and the bank has the right to get the car back.

    A's mortgage on B is not established. The mortgage does not deliver the collateral, and the vehicle is in the possession of A and should not be in the hands of B. B sells the car without authorization, it is not in legal possession, and it has no right to dispose of it, the act is invalid, C should hand over the vehicle, and B is responsible for compensation for its losses.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Since the car is a movable property and the chattel mortgage is not registered and cannot be used against a bona fide third party (i.e. C), the court will not uphold the bank's claim to return the car.

Related questions
22 answers2024-02-25

1.A and B met on the train, and A was afraid that he would not wake up when he arrived at the station, so he asked B to wake him up at station A and get off the train, and B readily agreed. When the train arrives at station A, A is asleep and B is not awake. >>>More

7 answers2024-02-25

You don't need to be too anxious about this question, legally speaking, your money should still be recoverable, mainly pay attention to the following points: >>>More

10 answers2024-02-25

China's "People's Bank of China Law" stipulates that the institution that confirms the authenticity of the renminbi is the bank, and the confiscation of counterfeit currency belongs to the bank, and the public security department or any other unit or individual has no right to confiscate it, but the commercial service departments have the obligation to assist the bank in discovering and confiscating the counterfeit currency. That is to say, if the general public or the financial and accounting personnel of the unit find "counterfeit money" (actually suspicious money) when receiving and paying cash, they should first detain the "fake money" and then send it to the bank for identification in time. >>>More

22 answers2024-02-25

infringement of the right of reproduction under copyright law; Public schools do not have the problem of tax evasion, and administrative penalties can be imposed.

12 answers2024-02-25

Email me and give you details!