How to solve the difficulties and hot issues in regulatory law enforcement

Solicit the opinions of the law enforced, the government is well-connected, and the political dignitaries are clear.

Some leading cadres do not have a sufficient understanding of administering according to law. There is "it is important to talk about it, but don't do it", and they do not know how to solve problems according to the law, but are accustomed to dealing with problems with the thinking mode of rule by man, and even use methods that damage the rules to deal with problems, and the color of "rule by man" is strong; Some of them are anxious for quick success, political achievements, and image building, and arbitrarily break through the legal procedures to engage in asset transfer and construction projects, and replace administrative licensing and approval in the form of special meeting minutes for some projects that do not meet the approval conditions; Some of them, out of their personal ideas and development concepts, arbitrarily revise urban and rural planning without legal procedures, and individual construction projects "go through the formalities after starting the construction first" and "change the plan while constructing", making the "planning" a "nonsense"; Some make decisions blindly and in violation of the law, replace collective decision-making with individual will, and even substitute words for the law, exceed their authority and violate the law, and give indiscriminate instructions on some specific work, resulting in illegal procedures, loss of state-owned assets, damage to the interests of the masses, and entanglement of social contradictions that have not been dealt with for a long time.

Legal Analysis: Some leading cadres do not have a sufficient understanding of administering according to law. There is "it is important to talk about it, but not to do it", and when encountering problems, they do not know how to solve problems according to the law, but are accustomed to using the thinking mode of human rule to deal with problems, and even use methods that damage the rules to deal with problems, and "human governance" has a strong color; Some are anxious for quick success, engage in political achievements, build an image, arbitrarily break through the legal procedures to engage in asset transfer, construction projects, and some projects do not meet the conditions for approval, in the form of special meeting minutes instead of administrative licensing and approval; Some of them, out of their personal ideas and development concepts, arbitrarily revise urban and rural planning without legal procedures, and individual construction projects "go through the formalities after starting the construction first" and "change the plan while constructing", making the "planning" a "nonsense"; Some make decisions blindly and illegally, replace collective decision-making with individual will, and even substitute words for the law, exceed their authority and violate the law, and give indiscriminate instructions on some specific work, resulting in illegal procedures, loss of state-owned assets, damage to the interests of the masses, and entanglement of social contradictions that have not been dealt with for a long time.

Legal basis: Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Information Disclosure

Article 7: All levels of people shall actively promote information disclosure efforts, gradually increasing the content of information disclosure.

Article 8: All levels of people's ** shall strengthen the standardization, standardization, and informatization management of ** information resources, strengthen the establishment of ** information disclosure platforms, promote the integration of ** information disclosure platforms and government service platforms, and increase the level of handling ** information disclosure.

Article 9: Citizens, legal persons, and other organizations have the right to supervise administrative organs' information disclosure efforts, and to submit criticisms and suggestions.

The basis for oversight is inadequate. Generally speaking, the legal basis for carrying out the procuratorial supervision of administrative law enforcement is still very scarce, and there is no law or regulation that clearly stipulates the functions and supervision procedures of administrative law enforcement procuratorial supervision. There is also no specific case-handling process within the procuratorial organs that are critical to the acceptance and handling of cases of administrative supervision and supervision, which makes it difficult to fully carry out administrative law enforcement supervision cases.

In addition, due to the lack of drafts and money stipulated in the law, the authority and effectiveness of supervision have been weakened, and to a large extent, the existing problems can only be effectively resolved by relying on the coordination between the procuratorial organs and the administrative organs.

Legal basis: Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Information Disclosure

Article 7: All levels of people shall actively promote information disclosure efforts, gradually increasing the content of information disclosure.

Article 8: All levels of people's ** shall strengthen the standardization, standardization, and informatization management of ** information resources, strengthen the establishment of ** information disclosure platforms, promote the integration of ** information disclosure platforms and government service platforms, and increase the level of handling ** information disclosure.

Article 9: Citizens, legal persons, and other organizations have the right to supervise administrative organs' information disclosure efforts, and to submit criticisms and suggestions.

The power and responsibility of the department is not clear, there is a gap in law enforcement, through the reform of these few yardsticks, and the frequent occurrence of unclear responsibilities and authority in related areas, and a series of situations such as insufficient connection between departments to agree to law enforcement objects, law enforcement is not standardized, and there are problems such as sports law enforcement and selective law enforcement. Due to the wide range of administrative law enforcement involved, and the law enforcement force of the development zone is relatively weak, it is not possible to achieve long-term and regular law enforcement, and can only be a problem that is more prominent or the leadership attaches great importance to it, and the higher authorities arrange to carry out surprise law enforcement, which causes the violators to not be dealt with in a timely manner, but only bumps into who is unlucky, so that the masses have a misunderstanding of administrative law enforcement.

Legal basis: Article 3 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the state organs of the People's Republic of China practice the principle of democratic centralism. The National People's Congress and local people's congresses at all levels are elected by democratic elections, are accountable to the people, and are subject to the people's supervision.

The administrative, supervising, adjudicating, and procuratorial organs of the state are all created by the people's congress and are responsible to it and subject to its supervision. The division of functions and powers between local state organs and local state institutions follows the principle of giving full play to the initiative and enthusiasm of the local government under the unified leadership of Chimu.