Seeking an English Argument !! Debate In career success, personal competence is more important than

Here are some examples. Such as Robinson Crusoe.

There are many more, just think about it yourself and summarize it.

Pay attention to English debating skills, mainly short sentences, simple words, simple reasoning but irrefutable.

Speak slowly, and your aim is to make it understandable to everyone present.

I would add that you should smile when you stand up, show confidence, and start debating after two seconds.

It is necessary to focus on the debate, not to go too far, to have a good attitude, and not to be in a hurry.

Just sum it up. As.

Dear teachers and students, think about it yourself, your purpose is to make everyone present understand.

I would like to add that it is polite to say that the truth is simple but cannot be refuted.

Pay attention to English debating skills.

Do it yourself, have enough food and clothing, have a good attitude, and can't be in a hurry.

You can give an example to show confidence and start debating after two seconds.

It is necessary to focus on the topic of debate, and not to go too far. As.

Robinson Crusoe.

And many more.

What a false proposition! If I'm the opposite, no matter what example you look for, then I'll ask you, how do you prove that the successful person in your example is completely successful on his own merits, and not thanks to the help and support of others? How do you prove it?

What about the evidence? Even if you find evidence, then I will say that this successful man's career is just one example. With a global population of 7 billion people, you can't replace all of humanity with a few examples, can you prove the universality of "hard work is more important than interpersonal relationships in the development of one's career" in human beings?

Think for yourself!

The scope and content of learning should be extensive.

You can't just get stuck in a textbook.

The university is a bridge to society and a transitional period, which lays a good foundation for accumulating knowledge and laying a good foundation for social work and social construction in the future. Therefore, the foundation of the building is the most important, followed by the upper part. The same is true for college students, whose learning is the most important thing.

To learn professional knowledge, learn to interact with people, learn to be self-reliant, learn sincerity, etc., these are all necessary qualities needed to go into society, and interpersonal communication is only one of the things that need to be learned, so learning is more important than simple interpersonal relationships.

The teacher who came up with this ** topic is really whimsical.

Nowadays, there is a fart for real talent, and it has something to do with it, and it has to do with the fact that the rise is faster than that of a rocket, but then again, your chances of winning a debate are relatively high.

Even those hypocritical old men know that the relationship is more important than real talent and real learning, and in the end, they have to say sanctimoniously, "Children are still really talented, and learning is important"...

If you don't have real talent, who will have a relationship with you?

Morality is people's sense of morality and justice in the spiritual field, and interests are the size of people's material wealth in the material field, morality is a social ideology, is the constraint of being a person, norms, rules, morality itself is used to maintain and adjust the relationship between people, people and society between individuals and groups of norms, so morality plays the role of restraint, guidance, adjustment, and regulation of interpersonal relations. Interests play a role in breaking through constraints, deviating from guidance, disrupting harmony, destroying norms, etc.

Non-toxic and non-husband, there are interests and at the same time consider morality, if you can't have both, first consider the aspects that are conducive to future development.

Why don't you ask each other when it matters:"Which one will you choose between morality and profit?".

That's your chance.

I think it's almost time for them to pack up their materials and go home.

You're a college student.

In the debate tournament??

Hehe, you're going to win this game.

We must emphasize the importance of interests.

No matter how important the interests are, the reality of the power of the relationship is important.

For example, business integrity.

Say it's moral. But in fact, it is a higher level of interest.

Long-term benefits.

When we do things or process things, the first biological signal that appears in the cerebral cortex is "morality". If something happens to a loved one at home, you must do it to the death, which is blood thicker than water; If something happens to a friend, he wants to stick a knife in both ribs, whether it is illegal or not, this is righteous anger; These narrow senses of morality are a pair of invisible hands manipulating the collective unconscious. I hope you are satisfied, this is my own word, no copying.

The purpose of debating is to exercise the rigor of thinking and the brain's ability to react, and to strengthen your own language skills.

Does Hangzhou University have a major in e-commerce?

Don't panic, I don't know if it's too late now, but it doesn't matter if there are more words in this debate, if you think about it, he is still a comparative debate. You also said that your position is that interpersonal relationships are more important than real learning. Since it is a comparative debate topic, it means that you don't need to argue how bad it is to learn and how good interpersonal relationships are, so you will suffocate yourself.

The biggest problem with this debate is that there is no qualification. At what level, interpersonal relationships are more important than real learning. For example, today's society?

Or is it life growth? Or is it a career? This aspect is too vague, so the person who made the debate really didn't think about it.

But since you don't say anything, you can define it yourself. Define a range that is beneficial to you. I think the original intention of the author is to survive in today's society, or to achieve a career, which of the two is more important.

This is something that you need to study further. As for the point of concrete argumentation, of course, it is also based on this.

It is also important to note that it is better to determine a criterion for comparative debates, that is, what is the more important criterion for measuring interpersonal relationships than actual learning. For example, you can compare the two to which is more likely to contribute to business success.

Then it is argued from several aspects.

In general, I hope it can help.