In the debate competition, the positive side has a debate and the square has a debate statement

What's square? Speak clearly

Our view is that those who achieve great things are not informal. What does it mean to be "informal"? This is a very general concept, and in order to make the discussion more relevant, we naturally need to give a reasonable definition of it.

The term "informal" comes from the Book of the Later Han Dynasty and the Biography of Yu Yan, and the Commercial Press's interpretation is to describe treating people without sticking to small things and not being constrained by small things. Mostly refers to not paying attention to the small things in life. There are two words here that need to be paid special attention to by the opposing debater:

"Restraint" and "subsections".

First of all, "detain" here means to be restrained, to describe being bound in. Obviously, not being rigid does not mean not paying attention and not complying. Not bound to subsections, let us do things more broadly and flexibly.

Secondly, "subsections" refer to trivial matters that have nothing to do with the overall situation, non-principled trivialities. Its extension is very wide, as small as the trivial things of life: clothing and daily life.

Big for self-interest: life and death. The great scientist Albert Einstein was unkempt all day long, which can be described as informal; The great writer Li Bai is uninhibited and uninhibited, which should be called informal; The great Comrade Lei Feng serves the people wholeheartedly, does not care about his own interests, and is even more informal!

In addition, "subsections" are not the same as "details", which are the elements that make up things and are indispensable. Subsections are the secondary contradiction in the development of things, and to grasp the development of things, we should look at the direction and mainstream.

The first debate and the fourth debate are all set in a pattern, the one in the first debate is called the opening statement, and the fourth debate is called the summary statement. The format of the manuscript is: opening remarks (respectful.

First of all, allow me to elaborate on the words in the debate (explain each word in the debate) and why we are saying it. It is based on the following three points.

First, (Argument 1). Examples of sub-arguments, summaries. Second, (Argument 2).

Examples of sub-arguments, summaries. Third, (Argument 3). Examples of sub-arguments, summaries.

To sum up, we unanimously agree that (your topic). Thank you!

Don't be in a hurry to find an argument or something when you encounter a debate... The first thing to do is to define the debate. In this way, you will have an objective understanding of the debate.

And then go deeper**... What is Edged? To define.

If a person wants to use his abilities completely, this will inevitably be a big disadvantage. But it's a different story if you're just showing what you're good at... lz think about these questions first.

Start by defining.

1. Now people should accept the use of fashionable methods for the Qingming Festival, no matter what they do to keep pace with the times, so they should pursue fashion, but the tradition has a lot of old ideas in it, and people who are now envious can not accept it.

2. The opposing party should try to put it as much as possible"Fashionable"Described as discarding the irrational parts of the tradition.

3. The Qingming Festival should also sweep away the sparrows and rot"Keep up with the times"

There are good parts to tradition, but it is the spirit rather than the form that we should pass on, especially the unenvironmentally friendly behavior.

4. The other party will target"Superstitions"Be prepared, and it is not advisable to use this as the main direction of attack.

Summary. Everyone knows the battle of Changping, Qin and Zhao, both of which were the most powerful countries at the end of the Warring States Period, it can be said that only Zhao can compete with Qin for the world, but as a result, Zhao appointed Zhao Kuo, who can only talk on paper, this person is full of theories, and has read a lot of books, but in the end, the final battle of Changping was lost, and Zhao has no ability to confront Qin since then.

In the debate competition, we are the opponent, and our point of view is that practice is more important than theory, and we urgently ask for a debate, thank you.

Approximate number of words.

A two-minute argument.

Ok, my point of view is that practice is more important than theory, right?

Well. It's the opposite.

I am the opposing side of the three arguments, and my practice of TV is more important than theory, so I will give you an example.

That's it up front.

A debate. You can change it to a debate.

Then what is the point of view that makes the opponent believe it?

Instance. Everyone knows the battle of Changping, Qin and Zhao, both of which were the most powerful countries at the end of the Warring States Period, it can be said that only Zhao can compete with Qin to compete for the world, and Zhao appointed Zhao Kuo, who can only talk on paper, this person is full of theories, and has read a lot of books, but in the end, after the most stupid battle of Changping, he lost, and Zhao has no ability to confront Qin since then.

There are many such examples in history, so it is said that practice is more important than theory, and it is necessary to learn to be flexible, not only theoretical, not flexible.

Can it not? Eat whales] [eat whales].