Seek the beginning and summary of the argument of discovering talents need to be examined .

Hello dear, when it comes to discovering talents, here are some questions and corresponding perspectives that may be early in the morning: Why is talent discovery critical to the success of an organization? Viewpoint:

Identifying talent is critical to an organization's success, as talent is a core competency of an organization. The best people bring innovation and creativity to drive the sustainable development of an organization. They have the expertise and skills to create value for the organization at all levels.

By discovering talent, organizations can effectively allocate and utilize human resources to improve work efficiency and competitiveness. What approach and strategy should organizations adopt when it comes to talent discovery? Viewpoint:

Organizations should adopt a variety of approaches and strategies to discover talent. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: Establish a reasonable talent recruitment and selection mechanism by attracting outstanding talents to the organization.

Develop internal talent and motivate the growth and development of employees by providing training and promotion opportunities. Establish a good performance management system to identify and reward outstanding talents through evaluation and incentive mechanisms. Establish a good talent relationship and teamwork atmosphere, and promote talent discovery and collaboration by encouraging communication and knowledge sharing.

How are potential talents evaluated and selected? Perspective: Evaluating and selecting potential talent requires a combination of factors.

In addition to professional knowledge and skills, attention should also be paid to the individual's potential, adaptability and teamwork ability. The ability and quality of potential talents can be assessed through interviews, case studies, assessments, etc. In addition, reference to past work experience, academic achievements and recommendation letters is also an important basis for evaluating talents.

Summary of the attack and defense.

The opponent's debater today demonstrated to us the advantages of the exam, and we do not deny the advantages of the exam, but the exam is beneficial to you, can you argue that the exam is needed to discover talents? There is also what the opposing defense friend has just discussed between our two sides today"Exams"The scope has expanded indefinitely, and it is absurd to conclude that all activities that embody differences are called examinations, then all actions in this world can be called examinations. We say that Tang Taizong Li Shimin is a good emperor, do we want to argue with us that the Xuanwumen Revolution is also an exam?

As a means of discovering talents, the examination is not conducive to the discovery of talents, and the examination method selects standardized and consistent people, rather than "talents", and its assumptions are wrong; As a means of discovering talents, examinations are not conducive to the cultivation of talents: examinations measure people's knowledge at most, rather than "behaviors" that are important for morality and behavior, and their selection is not called "talents".As a means of discovering talents, examinations are not conducive to talents playing a social role, and examinations are partially valid, and the system is ineffective, and their effects are partial and temporary.

What percentage of the population has made outstanding contributions in social positions without examinations?

Therefore, we firmly believe that there is no need for exams to discover talents! Thank you!

Example: Hope and English, which are now receiving a very enthusiastic response among students, and CCTV.

Aren't some other large-scale activities all going through a one-pass exam to discover a group of excellent people? Many companies and hospitals in society have chosen the method of examining talents. China's selection system is based on the Zen concession system.

The transition from the hereditary system to the selection system and then to the examination and trial system has continued to this day, indicating that the method of discovering talents through examination is a good way to stay through historical selection.

Then you have to make a summary based on the arguments of the opposing team. For example, if the opposite side says that cheating in the exam is unfair, then you should say that it is just a personal quality, and the examination system is improving; If the exam is accidental, you can say that the exam is not a test, but only a test of professional knowledge, but also a test of psychological quality.

And the exam is fair to all.

There are many kinds of exams, there are knowledge tests, ability tests, personality tests, ......The examination is a selection method that has been selected over a long period of time to stand out. No one knows all the questions, but we can find our own shortcomings from the exam, and the exam can give us ...... motivation

Skills: When asking, you can choose yes or no, yes or no, yes or no, ask more questions, and what? Trick them into answering the answer you want.

Pay attention to the gratitude to the audience and the judges, and do not use personal attacks.

Don't use rude gestures. When making a statement, repeat your own point of view, and thank the judges at the end.

It should be "Do you need to take the test to discover talents", right?

1.Clarify the concept: talents are both capable and political, and the integration of knowledge and action; The examination norms are within the narrow scope of the "paper answering" category; Distinguish between "need" and "should".

2.Discussion: Affirmation criteria: The criterion of whether it is necessary is whether it is more conducive to the discovery, cultivation and contribution of talents.

a.As a means of discovering talents, the examination is not conducive to the discovery of talents, and the examination method selects standardized and consistent people, rather than "talents", and its assumptions are wrong;

b.As a means of discovering talents, examinations are not conducive to the cultivation of talents: examinations measure people's knowledge at most, rather than morality and more important "behavior", and the selection is not called "talents", and its school standards are also wrong;

c.As a means of discovering talents, examinations are not conducive to the role of talents in society: examinations are partially valid, and the system is ineffective, and what proportion of people have made outstanding contributions in social positions without examinations? The effect is partial and temporary.

3.It should be noted that only discussing the need for exams, but not discussing "what is needed", understand that at this stage, there is indeed no way to assess a standardized thing more efficiently and widely than the exam, but the talent he assesses cannot be guaranteed to be the talent you define, and the discovery of talent definitely does not need an exam.

There are a lot of talented people in the world, and they are not eloquent. So, does bad eloquence mean that you are stupid? This is clearly not.