Can the Thunder fight the F16C D

Updated on military 2024-03-01
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    There is a big gap between the Thunder and the F-16 China's current best J-10 is only comparable to the F-16 A B, and the J-10G that has not yet been equipped with the troops is only equivalent to the F-16 C The J-20 is still under development, not counting the Su-27 J-11 is Russian technology, not counting China's engine technology and the United States are very far behind, neither the thrust-to-weight ratio nor the durability is good, the F-16 uses the F-100-PW, and the F-110GE engine technology is very mature and extremely durable.

    China's turbofan-10 Taihang engine is only equivalent to the F100 F110 early model, and it is also unstable, and the durability is average, the Russian Al-31F engine thrust-to-weight ratio and acceleration are good, but the durability is too poor, and the F-16 is a typical third-generation light air supremacy fighter, and the improved model also has the ability to attack the ground, and the improved version of the CD can be called a third-generation and a half-generation fighter, and the United States' information, command, and radar warning are currently at the highest level in the world.

    The Thunder is based on the J-7 as the prototype of the J-7 is a typical 2nd generation fighter Basically use the technology of the last century Fire control and radar are relatively advanced, but this can not make up for the congenital deficiencies But the Thunder also has advantages The technology content is low, so it is easy to maintain, plus ** cheap It is very suitable for third world countries And the Thunder is mainly exported You can think about the fact that the producing countries themselves are not equipped but exported on a large scale** can be better than there If it is against the current American, Russian, and European fighters, it is still dead The F-16 is still an important part of U.S. air power Before the F-35 entered service in large numbers, the F-16 was one of the main forces of U.S. light air supremacy and precision ground attack.

    You ask the Thunder can it fight the F-16 Normally, it doesn't seem to work The radar of the F-16 is very advanced And the United States has early warning aircraft and satellite monitoring Over-the-horizon combat Can detect the enemy before the enemy** The Thunder is basically hopeful The J-10 has little hope for victory against the F-16 This is the gap But I hope that the motherland can build a better fighter.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Obviously, it is inferior, the performance of the Thunder is not good, and even our own air force will not be officially installed, this model is developed for Pakistan, and it is a Sino-Pakistani cooperation project. The biggest advantage of this model is that it is cost-effective, to put it bluntly, it is economical, but its performance is not outstanding. The fight against F16C D is definitely out of disadvantage, but because the Thunder is cheap, if you consider the cost, use multiple against one, the Thunder still has a chance.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Modern warfare is a confrontation of systems, and the Thunder purchased by Pakistan can have SD-10 medium-range air-to-air active missiles after upgrading, and Pakistan also has the Y-8 early warning aircraft we sold to it. All three are the work of China, and when combined, they can give full play to their respective effects.

    With the support of these ** and information equipment, the Thunder can completely compete with any fighter in India. F16CD is no problem.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    1. The stealth performance of the Thunder is better, because of the use of a clam-type air intake, so the radar reflection area is reduced.

    2. The radar can detect a longer distance in the head-on state.

    3. The cost is low, and combat effectiveness can be formed in a relatively short time.

    The FC-1 "Thunder" is developed as a lightweight, simple, and cheap alternative to the MiG-21 and J-7, and also emphasizes the technical characteristics of lightness, simplicity, and cheapness.

    "Xiaolong" tries to adopt mature technology in basic technology to reduce technical risks and R&D costs, but selectively adopts some advanced technologies, such as DSI inlet duct, wing-body fusion, etc. And taking advantage of the latecomer, the technical level and flight performance surpassed the early third-generation fighters. From the start, "Thunder" has had excellent close-quarters fighting ability.

    After being equipped with the SD-10 medium-range air-to-air missile, the "Thunder" also has excellent over-the-horizon air combat capabilities.

    According to reports, in the Pakistan Air Force's many confrontational combat exercises with the F-16, the "Thunder" can consistently achieve the first enemy detection and first enemy **, and its performance exceeds that of the F-16Ablock15OCU and is close to the more advanced F-16Cblock52. Due to the insufficient number of F-16Cblock 52 in the Pakistan Air Force, the "Thunder" (JF-17 "Thunderbolt") has become the de facto workhorse of air combat.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    There is definitely no comparison with the F16CD, that is something that can only be compared with the J-10. But it should be a fight with F16AB, after all, F16AB is 30 years ago, avionics equipment is very old, no matter how bad the Thunder Dragon is, it is the latest to come out, and the electronic equipment is definitely much stronger than F16AB.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It depends on what model you compare, the early model of the Thunder Dragon can't beat the F16 of the same period, but the Thunder Dragon Block 2, the F16 early model should be about the same, if it's the Thunder Dragon Block 3, then it's not necessarily, the Thunder Dragon Block 3, the fourth generation of the equipment is pushed, that is the new domestic engine of the Fortune 31, the power is not weak, and the new active phased array radar equipped with the Thunder Dragon Block 3, which model of the pomegranate can correspond, it is hard to say.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    No Thunder is a quasi-third-generation fighter.

    The F16 is an authentic third-generation fighter, and the later modification is a third-and-a-half-generation fighter (European and American standards, with F22 as the fourth generation).

    There is no comparison in performance, the difference is too big, and there is only an advantage in the first place.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Without advantages, the Thunder is an ultralight fighter designed for Pakistan and other third world countries. In addition to its late development, it has adopted many new fourth-generation aircraft and adopted new technologies, such as DSI air intakes, etc., which has no advantages over other fourth-generation aircraft. The disadvantages are obvious, insufficient engine thrust, airborne radar performance, avionics system, bomb load, and range cannot be compared with the F-16.

    So Pakistan wants to buy J-10

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Incomparable.

    The J10B, which is one level higher than the Thunder, is also slightly better than the F16a at mostEarly models of the 80s and 90s of the last century.

    There is a certain gap with the later models of the F16.

    The Thunder is a low-end version and the F16 are not comparable in any way and something of a different tier should not be compared.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Basically it is certain that there is no comparison, real combat test, "generation difference". All of them are insurmountable, not to mention that the development of the Thunder itself has a certain political and economic purpose. So the overall gap is obvious, if you have to take it out, then the early model of the F-16A B should be slightly inferior in the avionics system, coupled with the smaller size of the Thunder, which determines the high maneuverability, so these are the advantages of the Thunder, plus relatively cheap and reasonable **.

    More and more countries are ready to procure.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    There are no advantages, there are more f16 versions, the early versions have long been eliminated, and the later versions are still quite strong.

    Fighting a war is not just a matter of a fighter plane, it is an integrated combat system.

    Pakistan can win with this F16 against India, because this is a joint research and development between Pakistan and China, and all aspects of product performance are understood, but China can't win with this F16 against the United States, because of the overall electronic countermeasures, logistics, and combat in all aspects of the comprehensive results.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Y on the first floor is a serious nonsense.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    The F16 has a B C D E F I type, depending on which model. The early A B type can only dominate the air, lacks ground and cannot fire medium-range bombs, and it is certainly not as good as the Thunder, but the C Dblock50 52 batch, E F60 I70 is better than J10. The JF-17 was originally a low-grade light machine, and the potential for improvement was also small.

    To be honest, this model has no future, no matter how cheap it is, it is a bare metal 3000W, poor countries must not be able to afford it, rich countries have long bought F16 and SU30, even if you sell J10, others don't want it. At the same price, it is better to buy a second-hand F16C D, the range, thrust ratio, mount life, multi-functional ability, etc. are far better than the Thunder, ** It is cheaper than the Thunder, and it has been combated. And the engines of the Thunder and J10 are also subject to Russia.

    The reason why the minibus wants Xiaolong is because of the production line, but it is still looking for second-hand F16C D all over the world, because the United States does not even sell second-hand him. In the low-end market of the third-generation machine, JAS39, MiG-29 and second-hand F16 are the three major opponents that are difficult for the Thunder Dragon Chicken Ten to bypass, and the quality and cost performance are not comparable to this, you see that JAS39 has more users than the Thunder Dragon, and the sales volume is also more than the Thunder of the minibus, not to mention the MiG29. As for the new F16 and Shuangfeng, they are high-end goods, so I won't compare them.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    <> "Good News for the Thunder Fighter: "Defeat" the F-16 to open a new order.

    The Thunder fighter jointly developed by China and Pakistan has been successfully exported to many countries after it entered service in Pakistan. The aircraft Block II has been painted with the Nigerian Air Force livery, and three with a new livery of the Thunder will be completed this month, it is reported that the order stems from the order agreement signed in 2016, in order to meet the first batch of Thunder fighters, two months before the painting, the Nigerian Air Force has been to Pakistan to hold a handover ceremony, Binghua inspected the Thunder fighter that has been off the assembly line, waiting for delivery, it is not difficult to see that Pakistan and Nigeria are both happy. It is understood that in this order, the unit price of the Thunder Dragon fighter is 61.2 million US dollars, which includes China's first-class supporting ammunition equipment, such as laser-guided bombing, missiles and targeting pods.

    Netizens who know about the Nigerian Air Force's experience in purchasing fighters should know that the Nigerian Air Force originally planned to purchase American F-16 fighters, of course, what it wants to purchase is second-hand F-16 fighters with a unit price of tens of millions of dollars. The F-16 is the sales champion of the United States, and the air forces of many countries in the world love this fighter, but the Nigerian Air Force finally chose the Thunder Dragon fighter jointly developed by China and Pakistan after some weighing.

    However, the unit price of the Thunder fighter is far higher than that of the F-16, from which we can also see that the Thunder fighter has a certain international reputation. From breaking through the international market at low cost to standing out in the bidding for international first-class fighters, it is not difficult for us to see the progress of Thunder.

    In order to enhance the international competitiveness of the Thunder Dragon fighter, Chinese and Pakistani experts continue to upgrade the Royal Thunder Dragon fighter, and its performance continues to improve, and there are experts in the aftermath of the analysis that today's Thunder Dragon fighter, its performance can be comparable to the French Rafale and the Russian Su-30MKI, so this should be one of the important reasons for the popularity of the Thunder Dragon! Moreover, it has served in Pakistan for more than ten years, and the current Thunder Dragon fighter has a certain actual combat capability, and it can indeed be called a fighter that can stand the test.

    Or it is precisely in view of the current achievements of the Thunder fighter that the Nigerian Air Force will be very satisfied with the acceptance of the batch of fighters, and relevant sources revealed that Nigeria may purchase more fighters in the future, and it is even expected to reach as many as 40, and this is indeed a good news worth celebrating for the Thunder Dragon fighter.

    There are many reasons why the Thunder fighter is selling well in the international market, but the most important point is that China has continuously upgraded its fighter technology, which has given the Thunder the confidence to upgrade its technology, so this is exactly the benefit brought by the technology of a big country.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    It doesn't matter, the Thunder was developed as the successor of the J-7 to compete for the world's light low-end fighter market. The project ** is the same as the previous Super 7 project, and the later Thunder refers to some mature designs, and also adds DSI air intakes to further improve its performance.

Related questions
5 answers2024-03-01

Hypothesis 1: Hamilton wins the race and finishes second in Brazil. >>>More

13 answers2024-03-01

I don't agree with the statement that F1 can drift, F1 is not designed for drift at all, F1 tires are designed to be sticky, not suitable for drifting at all, plus F1's chassis can not hit the weight required for drifting, can not make drift, F1 can not make a sharp turn, because the speed is too fast, once the rapid turn, it will cause the whole vehicle to spin, bad will lead to overturning.

15 answers2024-03-01

Unless it's out of control, there's no drift in F1 The drift in the elephant head D, which is just about 90 km h, is very ornamental, but the wear and tear on the tires is very serious. That's why the cars are hard tires that are hard-wearing and don't deform. But F1 is very different. >>>More

11 answers2024-03-01

Of course it's dangerous.

Each year, the F1 race is held in a very different venue. Some of them are now on the plateau, where the air is thin and used to test the physical fitness of the riders; Some are tracks made up of streets, where the road surface is relatively narrow and twisty, and drivers can crash if they don't handle it properly; Some of the circuits are wide, but there are also uphill and downhill slopes to test the driver's skills; Others are built in wooded forests, where the track is undulating and it is difficult for drivers to control the car. Due to the frequent accidents in racing, the FIA requires that all host country race tracks must have adequate grass buffers. >>>More

8 answers2024-03-01

1 Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes.

2 Raikkonen Ferrari. >>>More