Which performance is better between e31230v2 and i72600k, without overclocking

If you don't overclock by default, it's indeed ivy

bridgee3

v2 is better than sandy

bridge

The i72600 is slightly faster. e3

v2 is the default and has the highest turbo frequency.

Among them, the full-load quad-core frequency is 200MHz higher than the default, the triple-core frequency is also, the dual-core frequency is, and the single-core frequency is.

The i72600 defaults to a maximum turbo frequency of which is 100MHz higher than the default quad-core frequency, and a three-core frequency is dual-core and single-core frequency.

That is, if these two U are all default, the four-core full-load frequency is exactly the same, and the remaining three dual-core single-core frequencies are i7

The 2600 is 100MHz higher, but it must be taken into account that the Ivybridge architecture has improved after all, and the co-frequency performance is about 5% higher than that of the Sandybridge, so the full default is actually E3V2 is slightly stronger than the i72600, and the amplitude is definitely not more than 4%.

E3-1230 OK. i7

2600 built-in GPU. If LZ is to be equipped with a graphics card. The GPU in there is just useless. And the performance of the E3-1230 is the same as that of the i7

2600 is not much worse. The power consumption is also lower than that of the i7.

3570k is good, there's no disputing that.

Tell you what hyper-threading is, e3 is 4 cores 8 threads, 3570k is 4 cores.

The use of hyper-threading is more demanding, it should be that a core is impossible to use all the resources of its core no matter how full loaded, hyper-threading integrates 2 execution units in a core, the purpose is to make full use of core resources, but hyper-threading positioning is multi-request, as well as industry software, ordinary games, program support is very small, 3570k default single-core performance is stronger than e3.

In addition, the definition of hyper-threading performance improvement, because hyper-threading is the use of the remaining resources of the core, so the use conditions of hyper-threading are more harsh, and the performance improvement is about -3% to 20%, which is why 3770k is sometimes inferior to 3570k.

By default, the processing power of E3 is higher than that of 3570k in software that supports hyper-threading, and 3570k has an advantage when it is not supported or has low support.

You don't have to think about the game, it's definitely 3570,E3It's not bad.,It's just that everyone is just a cloud, and one person says it's good, and everyone else has followed.,E3 is deified by those and evaluations.。

Of course, it's Oh 3570K, E3 is a server chip that pursues temperature and low power consumption, while i5 is born for games and can provide strong performance for games at any time. Explosiveness is definitely higher than E3. If it's a game with more open, it's E3.

By default, there is basically no difference in game performance, multi-threading, multi-tasking performance is E3 1230 V2, single-core performance is i5 3570K is good, especially after overclocking, but 3570K Even if overclocked to 4G, multi-threaded and multi-tasking performance is not as good as E3 1230 V2.

The E3 1230 V2 can be paired with a B75 motherboard for the best value for money, and the GIGABYTE GA-B75-D3V, MSI B75A-G43, and ASRock B75 Pro3 are all good choices.

The game performance is about the same as that of the two CPUs, and most games mainly depend on the performance of the graphics card, and the CPU doesn't use much.

However, in terms of comprehensive performance, 3570K overclocking to 4G or more may be comparable to E3.

After all, the E3 is four cores and eight threads, and the performance is similar to that of the i7 3770.

If you play a game 3570k, if you are long** and image processing and the like, then you must use 1230, so, you use 3570k, and with p67 and z77 can also be overclocked.

Motherboard I recommend MSI Z77 or Sapphire Z77, for Mao is not ASUS Gigabyte, hehehe, 1000 do you want to buy Gigabyte ASUS? Pit yourself.

Processing performance is about the same, almost a grade of things, and when 3570k can't play games, E3 still can't play. Even if it's bad, you can't see it with the naked eye, but the cost of using i5 is still high, and you must match Z77, E3 with B75 or H77. Gaming performance is on the graphics card.

The game is more open and idle E3 1230 v2

After overclocking the large stand-alone 3570k, it has a 5% win over the E3, and there are equal to each other, depending on what you like.

E3 economy configuration B75

For the pursuit of performance (memory overclocking, turbo frequency), choose an H77 or Z77 motherboard.

It's still explosive, this kind of statement has come to say. Could it be that the i5 will instantly increase the frame rate of the game by 10 frames? These two CPUs E3 positioning must be higher,After all, the boxed 1700 or so** is there,It's an i7 quad-core eight-thread architecture,It's definitely stronger than i5 quad-core four-thread。

It's not for games, if the CPU of an E3 server can't even do the game, how can we talk about maintaining the stable and high-speed operation of the server? Although 3570K overclocking has a certain game gain, more than about three percent of E3, but in terms of heat dissipation cost, power consumption, and motherboard cost, there is no cost performance at all! And other special decompression operations, data processing, graphics rendering, and floating-point operations, are obviously strong in E3.

There are reviews.

For the 1155 platform, the more cost-effective one is the i5 2500k or i5 2550k, with a motherboard that can be overclocked, for example.

The P67 or Z68 ,,, Z77 are a bit on the expensive side.

Or a cheap motherboard H61 or something like that, with E3 1230 V2

3770 is good, but the cost performance is low, 800 yuan or so can buy a new Ryzen R5 1600 six-core loose chip, not to retain the ready-made DDR3 memory, who still uses this old platform now.

2550k and 2500k are only about 300 yuan, and the frame rate is only about 10-15% slower than i7 3770 in most game scenes, but less than half.

Another advantage is that it can be overclocked, even in the version with K, the 3770 is full of silicone grease, and overclocking is affected by heat, while the i5 2550K 2500K

The i7 2600k and 2700k are all good overclocking for soldering, and the temperature is not so high.

The first choice is 3770 is the right way, E is for server CPU, it does not mean that the game performance architecture is better than 3770, the product of that era is for,

i7 3770, you just have to remember that the E3 with the same interface does not have the same interface as the Core i7 strong.

In terms of performance, the 3770 with a frequency advantage is definitely a little higher.

In terms of cost performance, the E3 1230 V2 has an absolutely overwhelming advantage that cannot be just.

The gap between the two is huge, but the difference in rendering performance is relatively small (the two are almost identical in terms of technical specifications, performance is proportional to frequency), and game performance is basically the same thing.

For rendering users, unless your time is precious, a fool would buy an i7.

And the E3 can't be overclocked, so you don't have to worry about it - you don't need a good motherboard at all, just the most ordinary B75 can make it fly at full speed. And people who buy i7 often wonder whether they are engaged in overclocking, but the problem is that overclocking also comes at a cost. Miscellaneous calculations, the e3's cost performance is much higher than that of the i7.

Do you still need to ask? Generation God U 1230v2.Garbage guy only.

If you don't overclock, the e3 overclocking is just that i7, it's up to you.

In terms of performance alone, i7 6700 is better than E3 1230V5, because i7 6700 is clocked at a frequency and E3 is 6700, and the comprehensive performance is about 3%-5% higher than that of E3. But the ** of the i7 6700 is 400-500 yuan more expensive than the e3 1230v5. The i7 6700 loose piece is about 200 yuan cheaper than the i7 6700K loose piece, but the performance difference is about 8-10%.

But from the platform, at this stage, the cost-effective is still the combination of i7 6700+B150, although the CPU of E3 1230V5 is about 400 cheaper than i7 6700, but the matching motherboard C232 series** is 300-400 yuan higher than the B150 motherboard, so the current cost performance of the i7 6700 platform is okay. The Z170 motherboard matched with i7 6700K is higher, and the platform is 600-900 yuan more expensive than the i7 6700 platform.

However, there is still room for the E3 1230V5 to go down, and more C232 and C236 motherboards are gradually on the market, and there will inevitably be more cost-effective motherboards. It is expected that in the future, the ** of the E3 1230V5 platform will be cheaper than the current 400-500 yuan, which is more reasonable.

So, if you want to choose at the moment, choose the i7 6700 + B150 combination if the cost is sufficient. If the cost is insufficient, it is recommended to wait for another 2-3 months before choosing the e3 platform.

The single-core and all-core performance of the <> e3 1230 v2 is about 92-93% of that of the silent i7 3770k

There is no model "E3-1330V2", it should be "E3-1230V2".

The E3-1230V2 and i7-3770K are products of the same architecture, the same core, and the same process, but the names are different, and the former shields the core graphics card.

E3-1230V2--- base frequency, highest turbo frequency;

i7-3770 --- base frequency, highest turbo frequency;

i7-3770K--- base frequency, highest turbo frequency.

Therefore, in terms of parameters, the performance of the E3-1230V2 is very close to that of the i7-3770K, and the performance gap between the two is 5 10%.

Not equal to !! The performance of different models of CPUs will be different, and the difference will be different. Theoretical performance tests of the E3 1330V2 and the i7 3700K, close in the case of silent frequency, but pay attention:

First, it is close, and proximity is different from "equal". Moreover, it is at the default frequency that the theoretical test scores are close;

Second, i7 3700K integrates a graph core, while E3 1330V2 shields a graph core, this difference is relatively large;

3. i7 3700K supports overclocking, and the gap will increase in the case of overclocking, and it is not "equal";

The E3 has hyper-threading - four cores and eight threads, and the performance is similar to that of the i7. But it can't be overclocked, there is no core graphics, and there is no intelligent response technology. It is more suitable for multi-** use.

Of course, the game performance is also excessive. If you don't overclock, the motherboard doesn't have a lot of budget (B75 is enough) and doesn't use an SSD for caching. Then the E3 is definitely the first choice.

The 3570k has only four threads. It can be overclocked, has a core graphics (estimated to be rarely used), and has intelligent responses. It is more suitable for gaming, overclocking and distribution enthusiasts.

So choose according to your needs.

Personally, I think: Xeon can be, but it can't be overclocked.

The 3570k can be overclocked.

One is more than a thousand, and one is more than two thousand, you say.

The E3 cannot be overclocked and has a long service life.

The 3570k can be overclocked and has a short lifespan.

But between this long and short, 8-10 years long, if the LZ can be used for such a long time without changing the machine, or if you don't want to overtake, the E3 is the best choice. The reverse is true for 3570k. It depends on your actual situation to decide.

The e3 cannot be overclocked 3570k can be overclocked.

The motherboard on the E3 is relatively inexpensive and has low heat generation.

The E3 is 4 cores and eight threads, and the 3570K is 4 cores and four threads, which is more powerful for compressing large files and doing 3D rendering.

First of all, it depends on what your computer does, which is a 22nm new process IVB architecture.

The detailed parameters and evaluations of these two processors are available on the Internet You can compare them yourself In terms of overall strength, 1230V2 is indeed stronger than 3570K Foreign CPU rankings 1230V2 are also much higher than 3570K But I tend to 3570K As far as home computers are concerned, the current mainstream CPUs are overperformance.

1230V only loose chip boxed is also a deep package, the so-called warranty is the store warranty, of course, this thing is rarely broken, you can not consider it, but you have to consider that when your graphics card suddenly has a problem, 1230 is not good, because it does not have a nuclear display.

e3 is the server U i5 is the PC U There is no comparison, it's like driving a car and driving a boat, you say that's good?

By default, the performance of the Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 is higher than that of the Intel Core i5 3570K, but the Intel Core i5 3570K can be overclocked, and the performance will be significantly improved after overclocking, and the performance will be higher than that of the Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2. It is recommended to select the following parameters based on the actual budget:

Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 parameters:

Slot Type: LGA 1155;

Frequency: 3300MHz;

Number of cores: 4 cores;

Number of threads: 8;

L2 Cache: 1MB;

L3 Cache: 8MB;

Production process: 22 nm;

Operating power: 69W.

Intel Core i5 3570K Specs:

CPU Frequency: ;

Max Turbo Frequency: ;

Slot Type: LGA 1155;

Number of pins: 1155pin;

Number of cores: 4 cores;

Number of threads: Four threads.