Have you ever wondered why humans generally only eat the meat of herbivores and not the meat of carn

Because the meat of carnivores is not tasty, and it is generally very ferocious.

Because it is easy for humans to tame herbivores, it is difficult for carnivores to tame.

Herbivores are easier to catch, and many carnivores are key protected animals, and it is illegal to hunt and kill, and they are so ferocious that ordinary people dare not catch them.

Because of carnivores, people generally can't catch them at all, and they can't eat them because they are also nationally protected animals.

Because the meat quality of carnivores is generally not particularly good, and the herbivores are very fragrant.

I think this is mainly because of the food chain, the lower the level, the more energy, so eating low-level animals can better supplement and eat less.

Because carnivores are generally larger and more ferocious, they do not eat them.

Because the meat of herbivores is a little more delicious, the meat is delicious, fat but not greasy.

Because the meat of those carnivores may not be so healthy, it is not very good for people to eat it.

Bear's paw, tiger whip, shark's fin, snake gall We only eat a small portion and leave a whole corpse for them. It is because we are so merciful that we are the spirit of all things.

Some people eat dog meat, and dogs are also meat-eating animals.

Herbivores are generally domesticated and have a low cost of consumption and are easy to buy, while carnivores are costly.

Meat has become a common food in our lives, and it is also a necessity for the human body, but it is also not to overuse meat, but we found that people only eat the meat of herbivores, but do not eat carnivores, because the meat quality of herbivores is better than that of carnivores.

In addition to the above two reasons, we humans also have requirements when it comes to eating meat. Not all meat can be our Chinese food. Those meats that can be our Chinese food need to be very fresh and tasty, just like roast duck, pork, beef, and lamb, which are very common in our lives.

Herbivores are the law of nature because carnivores are also herbivores. It is easier for herbivores to reproduce and survive, but carnivores are not so easy to reproduce and survive.

Because they eat grass for a long time, the quality of their meat will vary. It is usually delicate and tasty, but carnivores are different. They have long eaten all kinds of animal meat on the steppe.

The flesh on their bodies is not only rough but also fishy. The taste is not to our liking. Dogs are also food animals, but they are also vegetarians.

What's more, they are man's most loyal friends, so there have been dogs since ancient times, but there are not many.

Then there is the fact that the number of herbivores is relatively large now, which can meet the needs of humans, the cost of artificial breeding is relatively low, and it is easy to hunt, so our ancestors also chose the meat of herbivores when they had meat, needless to say, leopards and wolves, almost no one has eaten these animals. One of the reasons is that herbivores are easier to tame and humans are more accessible to predators than ferocious humans.

In the ancient primitive times, our ancestors actually ate carnivores, because in the past there was no food, they could only eat animals, and now they don't eat because those carnivorous animals are more ferocious and not easy to catch, so people give up carnivores.

Because herbivores are easy to catch, carnivores are fierce.

Meat is now an important part of our diet, have you ever wondered why we eat herbivores like pigs, cows and sheep instead of carnivores like tigers and cats? Although dog, snake and even crocodile meat can also be eaten in restaurants, we see them more as special dishes than ordinary food. In the Paleolithic period and before, humans lived by hunting and gathering.

After entering the Neolithic Age, humans have become the undisputed hegemon on the planet, and the mode of production has changed to agriculture and animal husbandry. Whether hunting or grazing, people choose to target herbivores rather than predators.

First of all, herbivores are more docile. When they are besieged, they simply run away, rarely attack others, and are more easily tamed and captured. On the contrary, early humans did not have the confidence to use their predators as prey.

At a time when humans had not yet climbed to the top of the food chain, giant cats such as giant tigers, sawtooth tigers, cats, and lions caused our ancestors to experience many nightmares. In short, herbivores are bullies, carnivores are not easily confused with people, and nature is weak. The efficiency of energy transfer between different nutrient levels is only 10-20, which means that at least 20,000 kg of cattle and sheep must be weighed to feed 2,000 kg of wolves and tigers.

In that era of drinking blood, people could not afford to buy carnivores. This is reflected in hunting, that is, there are many more herbivores than carnivores in nature, and it is easier for people to find and hunt herbivores.

In animal husbandry, raising cattle and sheep is more economical than raising tigers. Assuming that grazing cattle and sheep can harvest one ton of meat per year, feeding tigers with cattle and sheep can only get 100-200 kg of tiger meat, which is a loss from cattle, sheep to tigers, wasting 8,900 kg of meat. If in ancient times people had difficulty dealing with carnivores, they could not afford their food.

After entering the age of civilization, human technology can easily defeat any carnivore, productivity increases, and everything can be completely devoured. Why don't humans change their tastes? The answer is also very simple, and that is eating habits.

The human taste is very coarse, whether it is flying in the air, running on the ground, or swimming in the water, as long as the taste is good, you are sure to find a recipe. But why don't carnivores, such as lions, tigers, and wolves, which are naturally hated by humans, enter the human menu?

Food for <> people. First of all, as a premise, humans do not eat the flesh of carnivores, not sea creatures and birds, but mammals. In ancient times, human beings only thought about what animals to hunt and what to eat, and what fruits to collect and what fruits to eat, and did not order anything according to their own preferences as they do now.

The advantage that humans are not carnivores is that they can reduce the spread of disease. As we all know, herbivores feed on plants, and the bacteria contained in plants are very difficult to infect animals. For example, molds that infect plants rarely infect cattle and sheep, so herbivores have no bacteria.

Why humans don't eat meat from carnivores, only pureed meat from herbivores. In such cases, people who go out hunting will obviously catch herbivores with gentle personalities and low aggression such as cattle and sheep. Of course, birds with small bodies and weak attack power were also caught.

For example, the ancestor of chickens is protochickens. Raw chickens are omnivorous, eating the fruits of plants and eating small insects, but because of their small size, they do not have that strong attack power, so they can also be used as bait for humans.

Why humans don't eat meat from carnivores, only pureed meat from herbivores. For humans, playing against aggressive carnivores is not rewarding. Carnivores, on the other hand, are highly aggressive and have the potential to become prey.

In addition, even if the capture is successful, the cost and physical strength are much higher than those of the same herbivores. So, even if carnivores don't cause problems to humans, humans will appreciate it, let alone not cause problems for carnivores themselves.

Why humans don't eat meat from carnivores, only pureed meat from herbivores. Carnivores feed on herbivores, so carnivores have a lot of pathogenic bacteria in their bodies. According to a certain study, when a lion licks his child's hair, he will give the child pathogenic bacteria when it has no shape.

Because children have a lot of antibodies in their bodies, they rarely die from exposure to these germs. However, since humans have no antibodies to these viruses, if they eat carnivores, the carnivore virus will infect humans, and the mortality rate may increase.

Carnivores are generally more ferocious, and the number of carnivores is relatively small, if it is raised in captivity, it is more difficult, and the rate of reproduction is relatively slow, so they do not eat the meat of carnivores.

This is because many carnivores are ferocious, such as tigers and lions, which are actually difficult for humans to catch, so they do not eat.

Because this animal is dangerous and there are fewer animals that eat meat, humans will not eat such animals.

Because such creatures are risky and carnivorous creatures are less aggressive, humans do not eat such creatures.

There are many reasons for this, first of all, herbivores are easier to manage, they can be farmed on a larger scale, the number of humans is huge, the demand for meat is also very strong, herbivores produce much more meat than carnivores, and herbivores are easier to manage in the process of breeding, and carnivores are at risk of injuring people.

One of the most important reasons is that the cost of raising herbivores is much lower than that of carnivores, for example, raising a tiger to adulthood requires a lot of meat, but the tiger can provide us with very little meat when it is an adult, completely disproportionate, if it is for food, herbivores are far more cost-effective than carnivores, which is why humans basically only eat herbivores.

This is mainly because herbivores are easy to catch. It is easy to raise, too. So we're basically eating these herbivores. On the contrary, carnivores are not easy to catch. It's also not easy to raise, so it's hard to eat.

Because herbivores are easier to raise, the cost is relatively low. Of course, not for this reason, just consider the cost.

One is that herbivores are easy to feed and do not cost money, and the other is that herbivores are more docile, compared to carnivores. The third is that the tools of ancient people were not advanced, and they could not kill carnivores.

Because carnivores are at the top of the food chain, their numbers are particularly scarce, and most of them are protected animals, so humans cannot eat them.

It's not easy to raise, it's not easy to catch, that's because people raise these things to eat meat, and as a result, you raise a carnivore, feed them with meat, and eat their meat, what's the picture, it's not very delicious.

Economically, carnivores belong to the upper layer of the food chain, and the number is much smaller than that of herbivores.

In terms of health, toxins will accumulate in the reverse along the food chain, the closer to the upper layer, the more toxins will be carried, fortunately in ancient times, there were no pesticides and no clenbuterol, at that time the meat was basically not toxic, and now the meat fed to animals may have no food additives?

In terms of force, carnivores have a certain degree of aggression, and if they cannot organize a certain amount of force, it is not certain who eats whom.

It's not funny, it's not funny....

This is because carnivores are very difficult to kill and may cause injury to hunters. It's not because the meat of carnivores is not tasty, it's just that it's more difficult to kill.

It's not that it's not delicious, it's not easy to raise, and the cost of breeding is too high.

The main thing is that carnivores can't afford to raise.

Carnivores can't win, if they win, they eat it, if they lose, they eat you, it's too risky, and the herbivores are easier to bully.

I didn't eat that kind of meat since I was a child