What should I do if I undercharge the customer for the goods and the company wants to let the cashie

No matter how busy the cashier is, overcharging or undercharging is the cashier's dereliction of duty, which is beyond doubt, even if the salesman and manager were also beside them at the time, they can only serve as witnesses, seeing that the cashier has received the customer's payment, they may see that they have undercharged, or they may not have paid attention.

In short, as long as the cashier confirms the receipt of the payment, the responsibility of the person handling the payment will always be inescapable.

As for the question of how to pursue responsibility for losses, on the one hand, the accounts receivable should be included in the accounting treatment first, and further accounting treatment will be carried out when the payment for the goods is confirmed whether and how much it is unrecoverable.

On the other hand, the customer should be contacted in time, if the customer is of good quality and pays the balance in time, then the problem is solved; If the customer is not very reluctant, but does not deny the underpayment, then, you can discuss with the customer and long-term cooperation, as long as they admit the account, the next time they come to buy the goods, the balance will be settled, and promise to give it a certain preferential discount conditions, or directly ask the customer to buy about 5,000 yuan worth of goods, it is estimated that there is no need to lose much;

If it's a customer with poor quality, then the cashier will have to spend money to buy a lesson.

Regardless of whether the cashier loses money in the end, and how much money he loses, he should keep this lesson firmly in mind, the busier he is, the more careful he must not make mistakes, and it is better to be accused of being slow than to take responsibility for less money. Remember!

I think it's best to reach out to the customer and if they admit it, things will be easier! If you don't admit it, there's no way, the money is in the cashier's hands, only the cashier is responsible!

Contact the customer first, but pay attention to the wording, don't lose a customer without the money recovered, then the boss will be even more angry. I don't think it's necessary to compensate in full, it's more reasonable to accompany 30%. You can wait for your boss to be in a good mood, write a review explaining your failure at work, and then ask for 30% compensation.

Just spend money to buy a lesson.

When the company pays personal advances, it must be agreed by the leader, and the corresponding signing procedures can be made, so that the person can write a receipt as an attachment, and borrow: other receivables - ** Other receivables *** The specific current account should be consistent with the set of accounts).

Credit: Bank Deposits Cash on hand.

When the individual asks the company to borrow, when repaying, the company should issue the corresponding receipt to the borrower to borrow: bank deposit cash in hand.

Credit: Other Receivables*** Other Receivables***

If the person who is talking about the advance and the borrower are the same person, then the procedure should still be carried out as above, and a receipt should not be issued according to the amount of the offset, so as not to be confused later.

According to the regulations, it is definitely not possible, and there are two lines of income and expenditure to be made. But now many private companies are directly subsidizing.

Hello, hope it helps! No, it is a sitting and expenditure situation, which is not convenient for accounting and unit fund management.

When the cashier receives the payment, it is borrowed: other receivables - cashier.

Credit: main business income.

When the cashier transfers the money to the company's account, it is debited: bank deposit.

Credit: Other Receivables - Cashier.

This is not very good, not very standardized, and there are tax-related and small treasury risks. If you can, it's best to receive money directly through your business account.

The company's basic account is used to receive payment. Regular payment is collected with a personal card, and the obvious funds are circulated off-the-books. This account cannot be done according to the system.

It is strictly forbidden by the state to set up a small treasury privately, and it is not right to do so, and once something goes wrong, it is not a small responsibility, and they dare not joke about their own future and fate.

This is not allowed by the tax bureau, and generally requires that the name of the invoice account and the name of the actual receiving account are the same.

1. The loan is not reflected in the company's statements: when cash is received, borrowed: cash. Credit: Other payables, when transferred to the personal bank card of the legal representative. Debit: Other payables, Credit: Bank deposits.

2. The borrowing is reflected in the company's statements

Supplementary Recording of Corporate Loans: Other Receivables, Credit: Short-term Borrowings.

Personal cash received, borrowed: cash (principal of borrowing), credit: other payables.

Repayment of company borrowings, borrowing: short-term loans, credit: other receivables. Debit: Finance Expenses, Credit: Other Payables.

Return of the bank card of the legal representative, debit: other payables, credit: bank deposit.

If personal cash is transferred to the company's account with interest, interest will be left over from other payables.

For individuals, under certain conditions, they may bear unexpected legal liabilities, the most common are:

1. Criminal law responsibility:

The crime of embezzlement in public office: taking advantage of one's position to take possession of the unit's property for oneself and reach a certain amount;

Crime of misappropriation of funds: taking advantage of one's position to misappropriate unit funds for more than a certain period of time;

2. Responsibilities under tax law:

Tax evasion: The money that should have been put into the company's account is regarded as the company's dividends and should be subject to 20% individual income tax;

3. Civil law responsibility:

The use of personal accounts by the owner of a sole proprietorship company to handle the company's affairs will be deemed to be a mixture of public and private property, and it may become unlimited joint and several liability when it is borne externally under certain circumstances;

Therefore, as a financial person, not only can you not use your own account for company affairs, but you can't provide this convenience for others, even if you have nothing to do at the moment, but once you settle the accounts after the autumn, it will be difficult to get out of it.

First of all, I'm curious why your manager wants to pay the ** merchant privately, what is the benefit to him?

Secondly, I wonder what you are worried about, why is there such a worry, how can he ask you for money?

The only explanation is that the manager is taking a kickback or making a difference in the middle.

What you have to do well is that the accounts should be written clearly and clearly, the manager advances the money, and the accounts are correctly represented. The money ** came, whose it's, to **. No matter who reconciles with you, you can tell clearly.

Since there are no transaction credentials, how can the manager ask the cashier to lose money? And the person who owes the money here is the business owner, and the cashier is just a handler who pays back the money, and the debt generally does not transfer to him, do you have other reasons for such worries?

1. Without a transaction certificate, why does he ask you for money?

2. The manager lends money to the company, not to you, you have no obligation to repay the money, you are just a handler, not a responsible person.

3. The boss is gone, and the boss owes the manager money, but he doesn't owe you money, and it has nothing to do with you.

I hope you are satisfied with this answer.

Since it has been recorded, it must be invoiced, which can be an ordinary invoice or a receipt, but it must be accounted for according to VAT.

Borrow: Bank deposit.

Credit: main business income.

Credit: Tax Payable - VAT Payable - Output Tax.

The overcharged customer payment, determined not to be returned, hung on the accounts receivable current account, accounting let the recognition of non-operating income, the accounts receivable should be written off, directly included in the non-operating income, the specific entries are as follows:

Debit: Accounts receivable -- a company.

Credit: Non-operating income.

Non-operating income refers to all kinds of income recognized by an enterprise that are not directly related to the production and business activities of the enterprise. Non-operating income is not generated by the consumption of operating funds of the enterprise, and does not need to be paid by the enterprise, but is actually a kind of net income, which does not need to be matched with relevant expenses. Therefore, in accounting, it is necessary to strictly distinguish the boundaries between non-operating income and operating income.

In layman's terms, all income other than the main business and other affiliated businesses specified in the business license of the enterprise is regarded as non-operating income. Generally, the credit multi-column sub-ledger format is used for classification accounting.

You have a problem with this entry, when you haven't paid for the goods, you should have borrowed: Accounts receivable - a company.

Credit: Primary operating income.

Tax Payable - VAT Payable - Output Tax.

If you receive payment now, it is.

Borrow: Bank deposit cash.

Credit: Accounts receivable - a company.

Non-operating income (overpayment).

Debit: Accounts receivable -- a company.

Credit: Non-operating income.

You're right.

This should be counted in the provision for bad debts.

Borrow: Cash.

Credit: Non-operating income.