On the question of whether the Old Summer Palace should be rebuilt?

Positive: Repair

Reasons: 1. Highlight that our country is rich and highlight the strength of our party Burn it and repair it again and burn it again We are not afraid that we have money

2. Restore the historical style

3. Beautify the environment, benefit the people, and highlight a harmonious society

Opposite: No.

Reasons: 1. Extravagance and waste!

2. Preserve historical memory, do not forget the national shame, and have educational significance.

I support the counterpart

Don't build the Old Summer Palace, because the Old Summer Palace needs to spend a lot of assets, in the past, the Old Summer Palace was built with people's money, and you have to find someone to build it, and there is a certain danger, and he is still the evidence of the British and French forces, so I think it's better not to build it.

Shouldn't. Here's why:

First, the Old Summer Palace, built in the Qing Dynasty and destroyed at the end of the Qing Dynasty, although it is a treasure trove of Chinese culture and art, it has little significance now.

Second, the Old Summer Palace, now only the ruins of the wall, to build it, is a huge project, need to invest a huge amount of money, this instead of building a garden that has disappeared, it is better to build a museum, it is better to use the required funds to build other infrastructure.

Third, the Old Summer Palace is a garden, many techniques, until now is still a mystery, if it is rebuilt, it is also a dog's tail mink, it is not possible to restore the glory of the Old Summer Palace before.

Fourth, the Old Summer Palace was not only a garden in the Qing Dynasty, but also a treasure trove of collections. This involves many issues, such as the management, maintenance, and safety of treasures, which is another big issue.

Fifth, most of the treasures in the Old Summer Palace are still lost abroad, and now rebuilding the Old Summer Palace is still a humiliation for China and a slap in the face.

If satisfied,,haha!!

The Old Summer Palace was not rebuilt. According to the State Administration of Cultural Heritage, the site of the Old Summer Palace is not only an important representative of the imperial gardens of the Qing Dynasty, but also a historical witness to the invasion and colonization of modern China. The site warns future generations not to forget the national shame and the alarm bell rings for a long time, and the reconstruction of the Old Summer Palace lacks the necessary archaeological and historical documentary basis, and will change the historical status quo of the destruction of the Old Summer Palace site by the great powers, so its necessity and feasibility should be carefully demonstrated.

Features of the Old Summer PalaceThe Old Summer Palace is located in Haidian, a western suburb of Beijing, adjacent to the Summer Palace. It was founded in the 46th year of Kangxi and consists of three gardens: Yuanming, Changchun and Qichun. Covering an area of 350 hectares, including about 140 hectares of water surface, there are more than 100 garden landscapes, with a construction area of more than 160,000 square meters, it is a large royal palace created and operated by the emperor of the Qing Dynasty for more than 150 years.

The Old Summer Palace inherits more than 3,000 years of China's excellent gardening tradition, with both the grace and luxury of palace architecture and the water town in the south of the Yangtze River.

The euphemism of the garden.

I thinkOld Summer PalaceIt should not be rebuilt, because the Old Summer Palace has witnessed the humiliating history of our country, and I hope it can be kept there to serve as a wake-up call to the world

Everyone should know that our country has experienced a very humiliating history, and the Old Summer Palace has officially witnessed the existence of this history. The Old Summer Palace will be flooded with a large number of tourists every day, attracting many people to come**. Some people see the tragic state of the Old Summer Palace now, and they hope that the relevant departments can restore it, so that future generations can see the most glorious time of the Old Summer Palace.

The Old Summer Palace was really beautiful when it was first built, about this, there are also experts who use ** and pictures to restore, everywhere is resplendent and magnificent, majestic buildings, high towers and pavilions really make many people sigh.

But now the glory of the past is long gone, and today's Old Summer Palace can be described as a tragic word. However, the Old Summer Palace should not be rebuilt, and this history should be left here, leaving it to give the world a wake-up call. When I go to school, I usually learn relevant texts, but I don't seem to feel this kind of thing from books, and only by really bringing the children to visit the Old Summer Palace can they feel the miserable state when our country was oppressed by foreign powers.

Moreover, the restoration of the Old Summer Palace needs to consume a lot of money, manpower and material resources, and no official department has replied to the question of building the Lu Tomb, saying that there is not enough historical basis to restore it, in fact, the information left by the Old Summer Palace is not enough to restore the garden, and there are many national treasures scattered overseas, so it is quite difficult to repair. Instead of spending so much energy to restore it, it is better to put it here, which has a better historical significance. There are many famous and beautiful scenic spots in our country, but there is only one Old Summer Palace, so let it be erected here in its current state.

The site can be maintained, and it does not have to be rebuilt.

Rebuilding the blind tour of the people is just one more man-made landscape and grinding finger pins, which does not have much practical significance. It is better to preserve the ruins as a base for patriotic education.

No, the first is not to forget the national shame. Leave a painful memory for the Chinese people. Second, even if it takes a lot of manpower and material resources, it is difficult to truly recover.