An example of whether to follow the rules or not

There is a rule of not following the rules to facilitate innovation.

Catch".Civilized etiquetteIt is not a quality that people are born with, but acquired, which shows that it is impossible to develop civilized manners by relying solely on self-discipline".

And then the arguments,"Without the supervision, restraint and influence of other disciplines, self-discipline will lose meaning and purpose, and it is important to realize that self-discipline is an acquired habit, not an innate gift

As a social etiquette norm, civilized etiquette is a behavioral standard formed over the years in the context of the development of imitation posture in human society.

Obviously, this can only be formed and obtained in the social environment, and there is naturally an element of other laws in it, and the so-called self-discipline actually presupposes the existence of other laws.

Because of the words and deeds of the elders and the supervision of the people around them, people will understand what civilized etiquette is and how to achieve civilized etiquette, and only then can they know what kind of civilized etiquette should be made in what environment.

Since birth, people must be guided by the wisdom of their elders and then be able to gradually form their own correct three views in the rest of their lives.

In such a debate, there are no loopholes at all, and the opponent's defense friend has nothing to do with you except to pull the topic back, and you will be invincible.

I don't think so.

The opposing point of view, rules are more important than morality.

1. Confucianism has been implemented in ancient and modern times, and the rule of virtue is an important means for the ancient kings to govern the country, but with the development of the times, the level of economic sales and Hongji has been far higher than that of ancient times, and the population has increased dozens of times.

2. The rules are the law, which is the bottom line in the current society, and morality is a virtue, which is praised by people and can be admired, but it must not be based on this, because society is a pluralistic book, people are pluralistic, and the meaning of morality lies from the heart, not forced from the outside, so I think that the current society should be based on rules, supplemented by morality, and complement each other in the social process of establishing a republic and common beauty. It is possible to achieve true rule by virtue and true greatness and society.

1. Release of the debate:

One week before the start of the competition, representatives of each participating team will be selected to determine the debate topic and the pros and cons. Both parties should check the debate on the spot, and contact the staff in time if there is an error. The schedule will be arranged immediately after the debate questions are drawn, and the debate questions and the schedule shall not be changed after they are determined.

2. Argument stage.

According to their own debate topics, the debaters on both sides will explain their own views in one debate, starting from the one argument of the positive side, and the content and form are not limited. Time limit is 3 minutes.

3. Attack and defense stage.

The debaters of both sides will conduct one-on-one attacks and defenses according to the debate topic, and the second defense of the opposing side will first select the second or third defense of the positive side for attack, and then the second defense of the positive side will select the second or third defense of the opposing side for attack, and then the third defense of the opposing side will select the second or third defense of the positive side for attack, and finally the second or third defense of the opposing side will be selected by the positive side for attack.

During the attack, the attacker can ask questions to the defender, and the defender only allows the attacker to ask questions, and cannot cross-examine. The attacker can interrupt the defender at any time, but the defender enjoys the 5-second protection principle.

During each attack and defense, the speeches of the attacking and defending sides will be combined and timed, with a time limit of 90 seconds.

4. Summary of attack and defense.

After the end of the attack and defense of the two sides, the two sides will make a summary of the attack and defense, and the first defense of the positive side will start first, with a time limit of 90 seconds.

5. Free debate.

During a free debate, both sides shall take turns to speak, with the opposing side starting first. After any team member stands up, it is deemed to have begun to speak, and after sitting down, it is deemed that the speech has been terminated, and his teammates are not allowed to stand up to speak until the other party has finished speaking. Statements will be made to five minutes each.

If one party runs out of time and the other party has time left, the remaining time may be given the option to waive the remaining time or continue to speak.

6. Summarize the presentation.

The four debates of the two sides will summarize the whole game, starting with the positive side first, with a time limit of 3 minutes.

It's been sent, pay attention to check.

1.The timing should be accurate.

2.Don't make indiscriminate personal attacks and follow the rules of debate.

3.During the debate, pay attention to the loopholes of the other party in time.

4.The poor don't chase, and the judges have their own sense of proportion.

5.If you can finish a sentence, don't divide it into several sentences.

6.Dress neatly and don't be sloppy, so that the first impression score will be gone.