Which is better P300 ZS7? Talk about it

Mine is the Panasonic ZS7, and in general this machine has less entertainment functions and mainly focuses on taking pictures. **Quality in the same level in terms of details still have a certain advantage. In addition, the 12x optical zoom gives the ZS7 a great comparative advantage.

I bought a 2300 ocean card from Gome with a ticket to get Panasonic 4G original SD card.

The P300 has HDR, ZS7 focal length ......If I were to choose the HX9, I would have the advantage of both, but it is a little more expensive than the ZS7.

Nikon's P300 is not understood.

Let's talk about the Fujifilm F505 and the Panasonic ZS7.

Both of these are large wide-angle and large zoom.

Let's start with Fujifilm F505. One of the biggest buying points is that you can take 360-degree photos. This is something that ordinary cameras can't achieve. The appearance is sleeker than the Panasonic ZS7. Cons: Slow snap-up, flash pops up every time.

At first, I also chose Fujifilm F505 as my first choice. The Panasonic ZS7 that was selected later, Panasonic's manufacturing technology is recognized as the best in the industry, and it goes without saying this.

Disadvantages of the Panasonic ZS7; The appearance is not as good as the Fujifilm F505, and the battery life is not strong enough.

2 recommended.

Fujifilm F505 is made of all-metal material, the body is black, the panel has been treated with high-polishing technology, the body lines are concise and dynamic, the corners are slightly rounded, and the transition is natural and smooth.

The Nikon P100 features a large zoom ratio camera with 26x optical zoom capability and incorporates a range of advanced technologies.

Judging by these three models, Fujifilm HS22 or Nikon P500 are recommended. The Sony HX100 is highly recommended, though.

You want the card machine recommended Nikon S9100.

This question you asked, not easy to answer, it is recommended that you go to the store to actually try, just look at the parameters are not the top thing, sometimes the machine you want, in your casual use can be revealed, the same price, configuration of the machine if you put aside the brand, it must be the cheaper the more cost-effective, no matter which one you choose in the end, I always think that trying the machine is a very labor-saving and effective way. FYI.

Nikon's card machine doesn't need to be considered, just skip it. Panasonic ZS7 is recommended.

Personally, I think Nikon is better. But it is advisable to buy a Canon anyway. The biggest difference is the night view ability and the restless point after high magnification.

There is basically no difference between several brands when used normally, but the night view ability and the effect after high magnification on the computer are different. Although the pixels and so on are the same, there are still differences when zoomed in. I have experienced it firsthand.

Personally, I think it's better than Panasonic ZS7.

Of course, if there are enough funds.

It's better to choose the LX3, his image quality will be much better than the portable telephoto on the market now, and the main selling point of the ZS7 is the telephoto.

It's up to you to make your choice.

Noise control comparison: The Canon S95 is slightly better at controlling noise than the Nikon P300, but the advantage is not significant.

Color saturation contrast: Pretty much the same.

Distortion vs. loss of light: In noise control tests, both devices have good noise control at low ISO values, while the Canon S95 is slightly better than the Nikon P300 at high ISO, while the Nikon P300 and Canon S95 have stronger color expression in color saturation tests.

S95 is stronger than P300, people's CCD size is there, S95 belongs to the high-end machine, P300 is also a general machine, they are not on the same starting line.

The CCD of the S95 is bigger, and it is indeed better than the P300, but I am still ready to buy the P300. After all, the price-performance ratio is there!

Personally, I think P300 is better, because I use P300

Uh......It's interesting to see how many people are looking at which of two very different things is ......Boss, the American fat cow and the Irish roast chicken neck are delicious?

The SX220 HS is a portable telephoto that can be used to take group photos at close range and to shoot birds from afar. It's just convenient, nothing else.

There are a lot of machines in the portable telephoto market, and all of them are competing for this market, Fujifilm F505, Panasonic ZS7, Sony Nikon, etc.

The P300 is the least professional of all the pros (no RAW, the sensor is as small as the SX220). It's a great prop for learning photography, although I think it's much better than buying an LX3, and now the P7000 is only 2500 ......

Forget about Nikon's, you should take a look at the Panasonic ZS7.

The decisive P7000, once Nikon's consumer flagship, is currently being replaced by the P7100. Other machines are a lot low-end, although the S205 is all the rage, but the telephoto machine is defective and discontinued, compared to the P7000.

In these comparisons, the P7000 is the best, and it is positioned as a high-end digital camera. Also known as SLR standby.

This positioning machine, Fujifilm is X10, Canon is G12. And, of course, the Panasonic LX5 and the Olympus ZX-1.

If you look at these models according to this positioning, the P7000 does not have any advantages.

The LX5 has a wide angle of 24mm, the ZX-1 has a large aperture and the most practical focal length, and the X10 has the most attractive exterior shape and the largest sensor area.

If you take a lot of portraits on a daily basis, it is recommended to choose ZX-1 or X10. If you shoot a lot of scenery, it is recommended to choose LX5.

Nikon P7100 is recommended. A lot of improvement over the P7000. A professional photographer's backup is not a virtual one.

It's X5, P300's camera function is more powerful, it's really not as good as X5. Or the landlord still buys a single electricity or micro mirror, small size, you can change the lens, high sense is good, the picture quality is good, and the operation feel is also very good.

LX5, you've set up a portrait in S mode on film, which is great. And you can set the settings in a custom C1 setting, which is very convenient.

And ultra-wide-angle, good picture quality, portable, all meet your requirements. It is recommended to enter the water, around 2400.

I really don't like it, then Canon S95, the portrait is the advantage of Canon, it's good without any settings, and it's also portable, but it doesn't look good, and the appearance is not as atmospheric as LX5. The wide angle is lower than the LX5 and more portable than the LX5.

The Canon S95 is also good! I'm using it myself, and the auto mode is very powerful in night shooting! But it's optical zoom only! The Olympus XZ-1 is also an option, but his lens cover is easy to fall off.

The P300 is mainly cost-effective. The performance is good and cheap, about 2000+. The LX5 is a little more professional, and ** is also higher, 3500+.

Canon, Sony's are good!

I suggest not to buy parallel goods, parallel goods are not after-sales, I bought a camera and was fooled by the merchant, and I bought parallel goods! Beware of the deception of bad merchants, some have replaced the original battery! Some anti-counterfeiting labels are pasted on their own, it is useless to check the anti-counterfeiting single anti-counterfeiting label, because the business can be fake, please call the official ** check the camera body number (serial number), you will know the authenticity at a check, the body number is forever the same!

This is my own experience! Good luck with your purchase**! Support **Licensed!