Is the origin of man really apes? Is there a new assertion in science now?

I don't think humans necessarily evolved from apes, because if we humans were to walk upright according to the theory of evolution, we humans would still be walking upright, but we humans are so intelligent now that it is contrary to the theory of evolution.

Revealing the True Origin of Humanity: Ape or Alien? Is the theory of evolution really correct?

It's about figuring out what evolution is.

Evolution, also known as evolution, in biology, refers to the change of genetic traits in a population from generation to generation. The so-called trait refers to the expression of genes, in the process of reproduction, genes will be replicated and passed on to offspring, mutations in genes can change traits, and then cause genetic variation between individuals. New traits are transferred through the population as the genes move through the population due to species migration or horizontal gene transfer between species.

Evolution occurs when these genetic variations become more common or no longer rare in a population due to non-random natural selection or random genetic drift. To put it simply, evolution is essentially a change in the frequency of genes in a population.

Evolution-Encyclopedia).

Evolution is group-based, and it spans a period of time. Just like the evolutionary tree in the diagram below, humans are just a small branch of the evolutionary tree, and the same is true for apes. It is some apes, not all, that are coming down the path of humans.

Many people are very curious about the question of how man came to be, in fact, he is very curious about this question, the theory of evolution is indeed true, and the internationally recognized is Darwin's theory of evolution, and many people will think that man evolved from apes. However, everyone's thoughts are different, so you should check some information on the Internet in advance.

I am also very curious about this question, and everyone knows that the teacher will also tell the students that man evolved from apes, so everyone thinks that man evolved from apes, but everyone's point of view is different, and you can also check some information and materials on the Internet in advance. The most famous theory is actually Darwin's theory of biological evolution, man evolved from apes, and some scientists have actually raised some doubts about this point of view, so they think that everyone has a different answer to this question, in fact, evolution is a theory of natural selection.

I'm also very curious about this problem, and I usually like to read some science and education channel materials in my life, in fact, humans did evolve from apes, and humans did not appear in this world before, and everyone knows that there will be many large creatures in the primitive world, but these large creatures have become extinct, so at this time human beings appeared. This is also a theory that many people agree with, so I think this is indeed true, but everyone's concept is different.

Everyone's idea is different, and if you don't agree with this idea, then you can check some information on the Internet yourself, because some scientists actually refute this idea. So you can check some information on the Internet yourself, and of course you have to have your own judgment.

The theory of evolution is correct that humans did evolve from apes, but more specifically apes.

The theory of evolution should be correct, because it makes sense that it is very likely that humans evolved from apes.

I think the theory of evolution is correct, and humans did evolve from apes. There is a certain scientific basis for this claim.

According to the prevailing doctrinal view, the reverse extrapolation of human evolution is roughly as follows:

At present, all human beings living in the world belong to Homo sapiens, and the birth time is estimated to be 200,000 years ago. Scientists have also found that our X chromosome can be traced back to 140,000 years ago, and the Y chromosome in our body can be traced back to 10,000 years ago, which means that the first mother of human beings lived 140,000 years ago, and the first father of human beings lived 10,000 years ago.

During these 200,000 years, Neanderthals (120,000-30,000 years ago) and Heidelberg (600,000-100,000 years ago) coexisted with Homo sapiens, and they were unable to adapt to changes in the natural environment and natural disasters (climate change, **, volcanoes, etc.) and became extinct one after another. There are also hypotheses that they were killed by our Homo sapiens ancestors, and there are also hypotheses that they triggered prions (a protein that can replicate itself, not just a virus that has DNA or RNA strands) because of cannibalism.

Neanderthals and Heidelberg Homo were Homo erectus (2 million years ago), Homo Homo (2.5 million years ago-1.8 million years ago), and Toumai (7 million years ago-6 million years ago). Toumai is probably the earliest known hominin, even earlier than Australopithecus (5.5 million years ago - 1.3 million years ago), proto-Conshure ape (13 million years ago - 12 million years ago), ancient ape (33 million years ago - 24 million years ago), and primitive lemur (about 50 million years ago).

All of these are the conclusions, hypotheses, deductions, and evidences that scientists have synthesized from the comparative study of marine stones, the measurement of ancient DNA, and the traces of the remaining living tools.

In addition to the mainstream doctrines, there are also some non-mainstream hypotheses:

The first is Sitchin's Chronicles of Earth, which argues that humans were created by the Anunnaki on the planet Nibiru.

The second is that ancient aliens believed that ancient aliens were constantly adding their own genes, experimenting and modifying the existing apes on Earth.

The third is to refer to the chronicles left by the Mayans, who believe that human advanced civilizations have always existed, but they have been destroyed several times before.

1. Ancient nuclear warfare.

After a detailed chemical analysis of 5,000-year-old human bones unearthed in Punjab, the Indian paleologist Kaha said: "I found traces of high temperature heating in all nine white bones. "And people have also found it here – the Tolitini substance.

This substance is caused by the rapid cooling of the surface of an object after the high temperature instantly melts it. So far, people have only found these man-made substances at the thermonuclear **** site.

2. Human footprints on fossils of ancient creatures.

Human footprints on fossil trilobites, an ancient creature that has become extinct (born in the Cambrian period 100 million years ago and extinct in the Permian period 100 million years ago).

3. Gold necklace in an ancient coal pile.

And in the coal pile more than 300 million years ago, someone found a 2.8 billion year old gold necklace with a delicate pattern of metal balls.

Personally, I disagree, but I still have to put forward some scientific arguments: the theory of evolution is also partially correct, because life evolves, which is due to the law of cause and effect. If they want to survive, living things will naturally seek good fortune and avoid evil, and evolve in the direction of vitality; Stretching the time to a quadrillion of years, it is not surprising that various organisms have evolved to such a sophisticated combination.

But a lot of progress is not evolutionary, it's created.

There are different theories about the origin of humanity. The science is Darwin's theory of evolution, and the ancestors of humans are indeed apes. After archaeological discoveries, it can be traced back to a long history.

Most of the evolutionary theories are correct, and humans really evolved from apes step by step over hundreds of millions of years.

The theory of evolution is now recognized as correct, and the theory of evolution believes that man evolved from generation to ape, of course, with the development of biology, the theory of evolution has encountered some challenges, but we have no better theoretical explanation.

Yes A large number of scientific facts prove that man originated in the animal kingdom and that man was differentiated from the animal kingdom. However, there is an essential difference between man and animal, and man has gone beyond the animal kingdom and has become a transformer of nature. And think:

Humans and modern apes evolved from a common ancestor, the forest ape. Forest Australopithecus originally lived in trees in dense forests. Later, the climate became drier in some areas, and the forests decreased, and the forest apes there were forced to live in the fields and gradually developed into modern humans.

Australopithecus near the equator, still living in forests, evolved into modern apes. The evolution of forest apes into humans was a long process, and Engels explained this evolutionary process. Engels pointed out that the apes that came down to live in the earth used their hind limbs to walk, their forelimbs to fetch food, and branches or stones to defend against predators.

In the process of using these natural tools, I gradually learned to make simple tools. In this way, man's ancestors had labor. As a result of labor, the hand is further developed and improved.

The emergence of human beings is not accidental, but an inevitability from a certain point of view. Humans originated from a monkey 50 million years ago, and it doesn't matter what you call it, but what matters is that it began to emerge after the extinction of the dinosaurs. Primates have a larger brain capacity and IQ, and have an advantage over other animals, dinosaurs are large reptiles that have ruled the earth for hundreds of millions of years, but have not developed civilization, which is also their innate decision.

The theory of biological evolution is certainly correct so far, at least the origin of species can be traced back to the source, not out of thin air. All life on Earth was originally a single cell, and it took 20 to 3 billion years of evolution to give rise to today's rich and complex life system on Earth. The theory of evolution also shows that the emergence of life is a continuous process and there is no discontinuity, which is basically consistent with the findings of archaeology and biology.