Are there feudal remnants of a constitutional monarchy in capitalism and where is the explanation ma

You are asking a question, when exactly are you referring to a capitalist constitutional monarchy? Is it modern, or is it capitalism, which had just established a constitutional monarchy in the 17th century?

There is basically no more, the main thing is that the monarch is still retained, and the parliament ** also provides the monarch with a large amount of living expenses and other expenses, and the actual authority of the monarch has almost disappeared.

Of course, there is a constitutional monarchy, which is the product of a compromise between the forces of capitalism and feudalism. The survival of the monarch is a manifestation in itself!

The constitutional monarchy can be said to be the product of the compromise between the early capitalist and the feudal forces when the power was not strong enough, and the monarch under the early constitutional monarchy still had relatively large power (such as Germany before World War I, and Japan!). But now, most monarchs and royals under constitutional monarchies are just symbolic things, and they don't have any real power! Suffice it to say, the early constitutional monarchy was indeed a remnant of feudalism, but now it is gone!

The remnants are good! To prevent the excessive expansion of capitalism, the chair of the separation of powers is the most secure.

Take the example of Britain, a typical constitutional monarchy, the bourgeois revolution in Britain.

It was done through the so-called "Glorious Revolution".

From this point of view, the British capitalist system.

At the same time, the British constitutional monarchy was also established.

But globally, constitutional monarchies are just some capitalist countries.

The form of organization of the regime.

The establishment of the capitalist system of dominance was marked by the victory of the bourgeois revolution.

Not all countries have adopted a constitutional monarchy to complete the bourgeois revolution and to achieve the victory of the bourgeois revolution.

1.Academically, a capitalist refers to a person who owns the means of production, uses wage labor, and extracts the surplus value created by the workers.

The capitalists emerged only after capitalism had sprouted and developed to a certain extent, because they used it"Employing labor", it was mainly the workers who were exploited by the workers, not the peasants who were exploited by the landlords. And landlords generally only have land.

2.Under the feudal system, from the labor aspect: the peasants were bound by the land and could not engage in other industries, which reduced the labor force.

On the market side: the natural economy of the feudal tradition, self-sufficient, greatly hindered the formation of a unified market. In terms of capital:

There is less competition, which makes the development of productivity slow. Ideological aspect: feudal thought"Emphasis on agriculture and suppression of business"It's obvious.

3."Is it because of the emergence of the commodity economy that the corresponding germ of capitalism is followed by output? "Yes.

The development of handicrafts was promoted by individual agriculture, and later the factory handicraft industry was formed, and capitalism gradually sprouted.

It can also be said to be"**"It gave impetus to the germination and rise of capitalism.

4.Capital: A mode of production or social system based on the appropriation of the means of production by capitalists and the exploitation of wage labor.

Feng: Under the feudal system, the land occupied by the landlord class was leased to the peasants, and the exploitation was carried out by the peasants.

5.The initial formation of capitalist relations of production, such as workshops, handicrafts, etc.

6.Definitions are different, see:"4."

The basic contradiction is different: feud - the broad masses of peasants vs the landlord class.

Capital-proletariat vs. bourgeoisie, socialized production vs. capitalist individual ownership of the means of production.

The characteristics are different: feudal - maintain feudal exploitation and hierarchy, and promote feudal morality (three outlines and five constants, three from four virtues.

Capital - Maintain the capitalist system.

In feudal society, the natural economy formed was an economic structure based on land, combining agriculture and handicrafts, with the family as the unit of production, and having self-isolation and independence to meet its own needs. Most of the key means of production in this economic structure are in the hands of the landlords (or feudal lords), so that class relations can be formed in which "the landlords (feudal lords) exploit the peasants".

All of this has hindered the budding growth of capitalism. Therefore, the feudal system hindered its development

Because of the emancipation of the mind, break the oppression of the feudal lords.