-
Let's see if the T-50 just launched by Russia can have a fight.
-
So far, the only regret of my country's J-20 is that there is no vector engine for the time being.
Compared with the American F22, the J-20 has an advantage in other aspects. And, Yang Wei.
Some confidential information about the aircraft by the general designer was also not made public. Therefore, compared with the J-20 and F22, there is no problem in saying that it is "evenly divided". Even, it can be said that the J-20 can defeat the F22.
However, although, the J-20 represents the highest level of our country's fighter jets. However, the F22 does not represent the highest level of American fighters. Because, the American F22 is a product of the 90s of the last century, moreover, it was discontinued in 2011.
What year, it happened to be the time of the first flight of the J-20.
There is a good saying that "when you play chess in a stinky chess basket, the more you play, the more stinky it becomes". The American fighter project "stalled" at the level of F22, mainly because the rest of the world is progressing too slowly. The fifth generation fighter of China and Russia.
It has only taken shape in recent years, 20 years behind the United States. Moreover, even if our new fifth-generation aircraft is put into service, there will be a long run-in period.
Go and improve the fighter. The United States is different, the first F22 is already a mature product and has experienced actual combat.
To give an inappropriate example: no matter how high the configuration of the domestically produced Changan ** "U" is, the market performance is not as good as that of the joint venture brand Honda Binzhi.
And XRV good. One of them is a mature joint venture product, and the other is a "small problem" that constantly creates a new generation of domestic products.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Since then, American fighter jets have been at least one generation ahead of the rest of the world. While other countries are still developing third- and fourth-generation aircraft, the United States is already equipped with fifth-generation fighters. Now, in the face of the fifth-generation fighters of China and Russia, they will immediately form a competitive pressure of combat effectiveness.
The United States expects to complete the sixth generation fighter in 2025-2030.
R&D and development work. According to the normal service life of the aircraft, the "first period" of China's J-20 aircraft service is from 2020 to 2050.
In other words, the United States is still about 20 years more advanced in the field of fighters.
But we don't have to be afraid of the United States. Because, our J-20 is not even comparable to the American sixth-generation fighter.
However, there is no problem in hitting other US planes, carrying out stealth penetration, and attacking land-based targets. As far as the young new China is concerned, we don't need to rush to compete with the United States for the first place, as long as the United States does not dare to provoke us.
-
I think the advantages of the two of them are a little bit more powerful in the F22, but the performance of the J20 is a little bit more powerful, so I think the two of them have both advantages and disadvantages, and I think they can be represented, because together the two of them can complement each other's shortcomings.
-
The J-20 and F20 are the most advanced fighters of China and the United States, respectively. The F22 is a fifth-generation fighter currently in service in the United States, and compared with the J-20, the F22 fighter has more engine thrust and higher speed. In addition, the U.S. F22 fighter uses advanced stealth coatings, and the surface area of the F22 fighter is smaller than that of the J-20, and the F22 stealth performance is better.
However, the J-20 uses a canard wing layout, and its maneuverability is better than that of the F22. The two fighters represent the highest level of fighters of the two countries.
-
J-20 It has good maneuverability and high lift. The two are the highest level of fighters that can represent the two countries, and they are both very good.
-
Yes, it's okay.,First of all, the J20 has a higher improvement in technology.,And the driving speed is also relatively fast.,And then the attack strength is also relatively strong.。
-
Relatively advanced, a three-J-10Russia is more than 10 years behind him and China is 20 years behind, and the United States has three-quarters of the patents in many key technologies.
-
Advanced is advanced, but there are many flaws:
1. The data link common to the US military is not installed, and the cooperation with other combat aircraft cannot be perfect;
2. The vector propulsion system is still flawed, and its super-maneuverability is not as good as that of Soviet-based aircraft;
3. The design is flawed, for example, it has been grounded many times this year.
The bearing, the speed, the speed.
It's a cost-effective card machine, I just started, its macro shooting is very powerful, due to my limited shooting technology, inconvenient to upload**, you can go to the online forum to find some other people to shoot good**, I also tried it myself, the effect is very good. . . Although there is no stabilization function, if you want to start learning to take pictures, you will definitely practice your skills. I think it's quite beautiful in appearance, a bit of an old-fashioned film machine, mine is black, but it looks very stylish, but there is an inch LCD screen behind it, and the quality of the display is also very good, absolutely enough for home use. >>>More
You can use third-party software, and if you can't meet the conditions, you can run it"dxdiag"All ok, if you want to see the hardware model you can right-click on my computer by right-clicking on Properties Hardware Device Manager or press Start Help & Support Performance to view the local performance, and then there are many options on the right.
Let's put it this way, infinitely close to the level of Audi A3, the new Octavia seems to be equipped with the latest EA211 engine, all-aluminum, with the blessing of the MQB platform, which is the same as Audi A3, so I am personally very optimistic and have the opportunity to go to the store for a test drive.
The U.S. military's bidding at that time was basically compressed into four bids into one tender, that is, the Air Force economic aircraft, the Navy economic aircraft, the Marine Corps vertical take-off and landing attack aircraft, the Air Force near ground support aircraft, the F 35 technology is undoubtedly very advanced, but it takes into account too many design indicators, and any one is a dead index, and the last thing that comes out is a four-dislike, air supremacy, ground attack, vertical take-off and landing, close support, everything can do a little, but everything is not good. The only thing that is commendable is that the ground attack is not bad, and in the end, it is the ability to play ground attack on the battlefield. Just like the F 111 in the past 60s, the original all-round aircraft could only be used as a bomber in the end. >>>More