Argument There is an argument after the argument is written, how to write the argument?

Arguments, arguments, arguments mean the following:

1. Arguments. The argument is the central point of an essay and the soul of the article. It governs the whole text, determines the choice of material and the method of argumentation. The argument must first be correct and clear, and secondly, it must be novel and profound.

In order to make the argument clear, we must have a clear idea before writing, which is the principle of writing first, to see whether our article has a clear point of view, it is necessary to see whether we can summarize the basic idea in one sentence after reading.

If these two points are not achieved, then the argument is hardly clear. Some students' articles are gorgeous throughout, but after reading them, people don't know what the intention is, which must be a problem in refining the center or pointing out the point of view.

2. Arguments. Arguments are divided into: factual arguments and Taoist arguments.

Facts and arguments: Facts play a very obvious role in arguments, analyze facts, see the truth, and test whether it is logically consistent with the points of the article. (Representative examples, hard data, reliable historical facts, etc.). Factual arguments include examples and figures.

Dao Arguments: Theories as arguments are always familiar to readers, or are generally recognized by society, and they are the result of abstract and generalized large numbers of facts. Theoretical arguments include famous aphorisms, proverbs, aphorisms, and the author's reasoning analysis.

3. Argumentation. There are several methods of argumentation:

Rational argument: Marxism-Leninism.

The incisive insights in the classic works, the famous sayings and aphorisms of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and the well-recognized theorems and formulas to prove the arguments. (Function: Strongly argue the point of view and enhance the authority and persuasiveness of the article).

Comparative argumentation: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments and prove the argument in the comparison. (Function: Highlight the argument and make people impressive).

In addition, in the refutation, the method of "using the spear of the son and the shield of the attacker" and the method of "reducing the fallacy" are often adopted.

It is often used in combination in the majority meeting.

Cite Argument: Citation argument is more complex, which is related to specific cited material, with quoting famous quotes.

The role of aphorisms, authoritative data, celebrity anecdotes, jokes and anecdotes should be analyzed in detail. For example, quoting famous quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument. Cites celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.

Arguments are the materials and bases used to prove arguments, including factual arguments and Taoist arguments. A factual argument is a true description and generalization of objective things, with the character of direct reality, and is therefore the most convincing argument to prove an argument. Taoist theories refer to those views that are the best in practice and have been proven and tested by long-term practice and judged to be correct.

An argument is a logical process that is used to prove an argument. Methods of argumentation include induction, deduction, analysis, comparison, analogy, examples, citations, etc.

An argument is an opinion held by the author, an opinion and assertion made by the author on the issue being discussed. In logic, an argument is a judgment whose authenticity needs to be proven. It is the center of the whole argument process, making it clear what the author is for and against.

Arguments: Facts (such as ancient and modern Chinese and foreign examples, personal experiences, etc.) and principles (famous sayings, state sayings, axioms, theorems, formulas, etc.) used to demonstrate opinions.

Argumentation: It is the reasoning process of effectively proving the argument through the argument and deducing the argument from the argument, which is the link between the arguments and arguments, including the hail of factual arguments, rational arguments, comparative arguments, and metaphorical arguments.

Argument: An opinion that you affirm or deny a point of view.

Typical and vivid arguments:

The argument is the soul of the discussion, the sub-argument is the skeleton that supports the soul, and the argument is the flesh and blood of the discussion. It is inconceivable for a person to be plump and colorful, with a soul and a skeleton alone, without flesh and blood. In the same way, only the central argument and sub-arguments of a discussion cannot be called an article, and it must also have typical and vivid arguments.

Typical arguments refer to representative examples and quotes that fully reflect the essence of things. First of all, it needs to be authentic and to the point. Second, the arguments used should be discarded and replaced with the new, and the present should be thick and the present should be thinned.

Some students wrote essays, remembering a few classic arguments, such as Sima Qian, Marie Curie, and Zhang Haidi, and used them from different angles, treating them as panacea oil.

In fact, even if these arguments are typical, they are not compelling. On the contrary, it will be better to select new theories and theories that no one has me, so that the examiner will have a sense of freshness when reading.

In addition, some students are accustomed to using ancient examples to explain the reasoning, and the whole article fails to connect with reality, has no living water of the times, and cannot achieve the purpose of fully reasoning. It is best to quote fashionable remarks and current examples of source closure that are of general concern to assist the reasoning, strengthen the pertinence and sense of the times of reasoning, and make the article more convincing.