Ask for answers to high school English correction mistakes, and ask for a few high school English co

Line 3: the others ->others, don't add the line 4: much-> more, followed by than, so use the comparative level.

Line 5: second ->secondly Second, use the adverb form.

Line 6: anyone ->someone, someone uses someone not anyone (anyone is anyone).

Line 7: needs ->need in need

Line 9: faithfully ->faithful should be used as an adjective.

Line 10: interesting ->interests interests, noun.

Correct the error and analyze the cause.

1those (who) want to go hiking must tell our monitor after breakfast.

In this sentence, want to go hiking is the subject clause, and the relative pronoun should be who

2the building has （been）rebuilt twice.

This should be the passive voice in the present perfect tense, which translates to: the building has been renovated twice.

3he suggested that you finished your homework first.

In this sentence, finished should be changed to finish, should be suggest is a suggestion verb, if the clause is the suggested content, then the modal verb shou should be added to the verb form, should be omitted, in this sentence, that is, shou is omitted, followed by the verb form.

5was it five o'clockthat he came back yesterday?

This sentence should be changed to when, and this sentence should emphasize the structure, and the relative pronoun when emphasizing time should be used

6the book is worth being read.

Being is removed, this book is worth reading, and the phrase itself means "something worth doing", and there is no need to add a passive voice.

7he did everything he could （to）escape from the fire.

A to should be added here to indicate the purpose. The sentence means: He did everything he could to escape from the fire.

8he repeated his opinion in order to make himself understand.

Replace understand with understood. Make oneself understood is a set match, which means to make one's meaning clear.

9i would rather to walk than take a bus.

would rather do sth. than do sth.Fixed collocation, would rather do something.

Remove will

was changed to has

beenthey changed to it

ゴネト is changed to beenin

2. many---most

3. sheeps---sheep

4. few---little

5.by---on(live on fixed phrase.)"In order to... for food"）6.Remove a

8.great--- Greatly (adverbs need to be used to modify verbs) 9 singing---sing

10. piano---the piano

Remove the aftermath for sure! To determine the error of this wrong sentence, you need to understand the gist of the sentence, understand the usage of soon and soon after, and also use the method of dividing the sentence components to determine it.

First of all, understand that soon and soon mean "soon", adverbs, which can be used as temporal adverbials alone. Soon After means "...Soon after", since after has a preposition and a conjunction part of speech, soon after can be followed by a noun, a noun, a noun, a pronoun as a temporal adverbial, or soon after to guide a temporal adverbial clause.

Secondly, divide the sentence component judgment. I just mentioned that soon after can lead the time adverbial clause, if you think that soon after the firefighters will comeIf it is a clause, then the question is wrong (obviously not in this case), because the clause generally cannot exist separately from the main clause.

The possibility of a clause is excluded, and obviously the above sentence is a simple sentence with three sentence components: subject, predicate, and adverbial. Soon is used as a temporal adverbial alone, will and come are used as predicates, and the rest of the sentence is used as the subject. So what can be the subject?

The ones that can be the subject are pronouns, nouns, phrases that play the role of nouns (infinitives and gerunds), subject clauses, etc. Therefore, the preposition after cannot be the same subject as the noun The Firefighters.

Finally, from the above two points, it can be concluded that the sentence is to the effect that "soon the firefighters will come", and the after should be deleted, and the noun The firefighters should be used as the subject alone.