To debate whether the national craft should be kept secret 100

Zhengfang: National skills are the treasure of our Chinese nation, and we should protect it. If the whole world knows our national skills, can it still be called national skills?

She has been assimilated by others. If anyone does this, then he will be a sinner of the Chinese nation, and he cannot bear this kind of historical responsibility.

Opposite: The secrecy of national skills seriously affects cultural exchanges and national progress, and cannot develop together with the modern economy, which will become another factor hindering social progress.

And give you a post bar address, the above is also a debate competition related to you, you go and see it, if it's good, I strongly ask to give me extra points!

The transition of secrecy of national skills will hinder the trend of globalization and is not conducive to the competition and development of this skill, here I want to come to drill with you, what is the most terrible thing that has been embodied in people since ancient times? Answer: Inertia!

Imagine, on the one hand, if any kind of national skill of a nation is unconditionally fully displayed, it is "selfless and generous".

Are you positive or negative?

Summary. Debate: National skills should be kept secret, arguments, offensive issues, and free debate issues.

I just finished arguing this ...... yesterdayBut I'm ...... the oppositeAnd we won ......Actually, this one is more on the opposite side. But you can sneak a search on Youku, there is a ** of this debate, you can use their questions. The other party may not think of empty object search bucket transport frequency, and some problems can still be used.

Can you give some non-confidential questions to the counterparty, and ask them in the form of questions.

Thank you for keeping it a little secret.

What should be done in the second debate.

Braids should provide more information.

Isn't it going to be questioned and debated?

You're not arguing.

I'm a second debater. In the second debate, more evidence should be obtained and the first debate should be debated.

Debate Question: Whether national skills should be kept secret, the second argument strategy of the opposing side.

Secrecy, for what? Secrecy has always had only one role, to gain a competitive advantage, whether it is a military or a commercial partner, secrecy has only one role, that is, to gain a competitive advantage. National skills, if you want to prove that it does not need to be kept secret, then, there are only two ways to prove it:

1. It doesn't need competition, so it doesn't need secrecy 2. Secrecy doesn't give him a competitive advantage. You can ask each other questions about these two points. For example, you can ask the other party, who is the secret of the national skill to protect the Huai branch, and once this "who" obtains the secret of the national skill, can it have any competitive impact on our nation?

The dissemination and comparison of national skills is conducive to the promotion and development of national skills, the exchange of national culture and the promotion of national economic spirits.

Resting on one's laurels, self-appreciation, no benefit to the development of national skills, mystery is not the embodiment of artistic beauty, the real beauty is the resonance in people's hearts when the skills are displayed.

The secrecy of the skill only sees the immediate benefits, but the disclosure of the skill will obtain more long-term benefits. So it's better to go out with skills.

In today's globalization, the integration of skills and even culture has become an inevitable trend.

Many skills have been lost because they are too "secretive", such as the carving on the peach pit. Moreover, the improvement, improvement and transmission of skills cannot be done by one or two families, since it is a national skill, it should be shared by the nation.

If it were me, I would first think about it from the perspective of patent rights, and then think in the direction that scarcity is expensive, and protecting national skills is equivalent to protecting a kind of trade secret.

We should make a good distinction between applying for a patent and keeping secrets, because the more national it is, the more global it is. Even in the practical sense of today's society, there are still things in today's world that have secrets in today's increasingly high-tech world.

Distinguish between "whether or not to keep secret" and "whether to apply for a patent". Pointing out the "secrecy" of the other party is also to protect traditional crafts, but protection is not the same as self-isolation. Secondly, development is the best protection, only by improving itself, can the national skills be inherited and developed to the greatest extent.

Thirdly, in today's increasingly extensive cultural and artistic exchanges, the way out for protecting traditional culture and developing national skills lies in applying for patents rather than secrecy.

If you fight harder, is the "inheritance" of national skills considered confidential? In other words, what level of behavior can be called "secrecy"? You can ask for a quantifiable criterion.

The key is whether "secrecy" should be chosen as the only way to protect national skills, and if not, then what should be done, such as applying for a patent.

Counter-argument: Maybe applying for a patent can protect the national craft. However, there is a time limit for patent rights, which is generally five years. In other words, after five years, this skill must be made public, so that everyone can learn it; That's no secret.

But think about it on the other hand, if everyone knows it, can it still be regarded as having national characteristics? Suppose the clay man, if everyone knows it, the street is full of clay people, and everyone is a Monkey King at will, can it still be regarded as a national skill?

The reason why national skills are precious is because they are in the hands of a few. Why keep it secret, it is also because he is precious, if everyone learns it, it will not be precious. Even if you apply for a patent, it is useless, because you still have to disclose it when the time limit is up.

Positive rebuttal: Secrecy means that only one person knows, and the second person does not know. Well, the question is, if there is really only one person who knows, then how do you know this national skill?

Thank you, Chairman, distinguished judges, dear students, and friends on the other side

Good evening, everyone!

First of all, I would like to thank the other side for their wonderful arguments, but I would like to make my point of view as well. The topic of our debate today is "whether national skills should be kept secret", and our side believes that "national skills should not be kept secret."

The concept comes first. National skills, that is, performing arts or crafts with certain national characteristics and full of skills. What we mean by non-secrecy is to fully show the national skills to the world, and will not refuse anyone who has the heart to learn.

We do not keep the national skills secret, so that they can be better carried forward. Below, I will further elaborate on my views from the following three aspects:

First of all, from the perspective of the national skill itself, non-secrecy is a better protection, which is more conducive to its inheritance and development. National skills have their own characteristics and are a sign and symbol of pride for a country. But now, it is in an endangered period, and many folk artists have passed away but have not spread their real skills, which is undoubtedly a huge loss to the Chinese national culture.

It is not kept secret, let the world know that its roots are in China, and while carrying forward the national skills, it also avoids the recurrence of the tragedy of the "Dragon Boat Festival". Not keeping it secret, let the Chinese people recognize this status quo and enhance their own sense of national crisis, which will prompt the Chinese people to deeply understand and learn national skills, which is more conducive to its inheritance and development.

Secondly, from the perspective of the country, the non-secrecy of national skills is more conducive to the national culture of all countries to stand solidly and steadily in the forest of world culture. Taking our country as an example, while we are spreading our national skills to the world, we are also showing the world our profound cultural heritage. When people learn China's national skills, they will inevitably have an understanding and understanding of China's history, so as to establish a beautiful image of a cultural power, and then improve China's status and influence in the world.

Thirdly, from the perspective of the world, not keeping national skills secret is more conducive to the integration of world cultures. In today's globalized world, the integration of skills and even cultures has become an inevitable trend. The opening of the Sino-Japanese Cultural Festival is a good embodiment.

It provides a platform for people to appreciate the craftsmanship of various ethnic groups. We can say that the non-secrecy of national skills is the dissemination and exchange of culture, and it is also the promotion of the cultural spirit of various ethnic groups. Such non-secrecy has indirectly promoted economic and political development between countries, thus conforming to the theme of today's world - peace and development.

The carvings, fine-grained carved paper, rice plastics, and people in the once famous township are now rare to see, and it is even difficult to escape the danger of losing their skills. The swan song will also become a swan song.

To sum up, whether it is from the perspective of the national skill itself, or from the perspective of the country and the world. Not keeping it secret will do more harm than good to us, to the nation, and to all mankind. That's why we insist that national skills should not be kept secret.