Spring Airlines refuses to carry a depressed patient, why is the person concerned complained by pass

Spring Airlines refused to carry depressed patients, and the reason why the passengers complained about it was that they felt that it proved that the person concerned did not respect the depressed patients and looked at them with colored glasses, and the passengers felt that their legitimate rights and interests had been infringed.

The main reason is that the parties are very emotional, and the passengers are afraid that the parties will threaten them, so they have to complain.

Because of the delay in the normal departure time of the aircraft. Because the patient kept blocking the staff, the plane was delayed, which made other passengers unhappy.

Because the passengers who accompanied him were afraid that he would get sick during the flight, which would affect him. So a complaint was filed.

Yes, passengers should not be denied boarding even if they are depressed, they have the right to fly.

I think it is discrimination, and doing so will increase the psychological burden of depressed patients, causing an impact, we should be tolerant and caring for depressed patients, and not limit their permissions because of this.

I don't think it's a form of discrimination, but a kind of protection for people with depression, because people with depression are likely to do things that hurt themselves for outside reasons.

The airline responded afterwards that the passengers were more emotional and did not know the case, and refused to board the passengers for the sake of the safety of the passengers themselves and all passengers. This is discrimination against people who are sick, not just people with depression.

It's not discrimination. Spring Airlines staff reassured the patient, but after repeated attempts, the patient was still emotionally unstable. For the safety of the patient, he was refused to register and was advised to take the high-speed rail.

I think it's a kind of discrimination, and I'm worried that if something bad happens to a depressed person on the plane, it will only add a lot of trouble in the future.

I think it's disrespectful to people with depression, they're just sick, they're not monsters, why keep them out? You can let family members accompany you on board, and flight attendants can pay more attention to them, rather than being vigilant everywhere.

Spring Airlines' response to the denied boarding of depressed patients is not discrimination against depressed patients, but out of safety considerations and to ensure the protection of other passengers.

This approximate process can be seen that the cause of the matter is only because of the depressed patient's hand tremor and emotional instability, at this time, the airline feels that the depressed patient will affect other people, and even affect the safe flight of the aircraft, for such a reply, here I feel that this situation can not reflect a lot of humanization, if it is just emotional instability or hand trembling, then this is not a problem involving the safe flight of the aircraft, but will it affect others? This can't be judged yet, so Spring Airlines refused to allow depressed people to board the plane from the beginning, and I feel that there are many inappropriate things about Spring Airlines' behavior.

Finally, what do you think about this? It felt that people with depression had the right to board the plane, and they were in a hurry to see a doctor, if it were a different patient, would Spring Airlines still do it? In this regard, people with depression are in a vulnerable position, and Spring Airlines should give more help in this regard.

I think Spring Airlines did the right thing about this, after all, the depressed person is emotionally unstable, and if he is allowed to board the plane, in case of an accident on the plane.

I think Spring Airlines' approach is understandable. There will be dozens of people on a plane, and once it takes off, it is necessary to try to ensure safety during the flight, and the cost of a forced landing is very high, so the airline must do its best to minimize the risk in the flight. Depression is a risk factor for airlines.

This is a serious act of discrimination, and the company should be penalized by the relevant authorities. It also gives consumers a fair hand.

I don't think it should be, because people who are depressed also have self-esteem, and they don't want to get depressed.

The depressed patient was denied boarding, Spring Airlines responded, but netizens quarreled.

The female passenger's hands trembled because she was suffering from depression and medication, and Spring Airlines could only handle the refund for the safety of the passengers because she had comforted the passengers many times but could not stabilize her emotions, all for the safety of the passengers and other passengers. In short, it should indeed be understood.

Officials said that when they knew that the patient was suffering from depression, they first comforted the patient's emotions, but the patient did not calm down, so for the safety of other passengers, they refused to board.

Spring Airlines' refusal to carry depressed patients is officially believed to be out of consideration for the passenger's own physical condition, so the refusal is correct!

The official report did not know at the time that the patient was depressed, but because he seemed very excited during the communication with the flight attendant, the airline refused to carry the passenger for the safety of the entire passenger on the plane.

I felt that this was a very excessive thing, because the airport staff did not take into account the difficulties of depressed patients at that time, and even prevented them from seeing a doctor in time.

It can also be seen from here that the airport staff did not understand the depressed patient at that time, if the person who was flying was not a depressed person, but a person with other medical conditions, would the airport staff still do this at this time? Many people think that the airport staff may be more helpful.

On the whole, when a depressed patient needs help, no matter who is in need of help, no matter who should be more considerate, if you really think about it seriously, the depressed patient in this situation will hardly have any impact on the safe operation of the aircraft, because although the depressed patient was emotionally unstable at that time, but her consciousness is still there, she knows what to do, and at the same time there is a boyfriend by her side, and depression is not a terrible disease, in this case, I feel that the airline should let the depressed person board, But the airline didn't do that, so it felt a bit excessive.

excessive, but the reason why the airline did this is also for the sake of the big picture and to avoid flight accidents.

Not excessive, because this is done responsibly to the patient, so as not to be difficult to control the illness halfway and avoid accidents.

It's not too much, because the woman had an aggressive behavior at that time, and Spring Airlines also refused to carry a depressed patient out of consideration for the passengers. After all, if he hurts someone, then it's not a big deal.

Yes, very excessively. It is not his idea that the passenger suffers from depression, and that depression is not dangerous and does not harm others, so why should Spring Airlines refuse to board?

Of course, there are many people on the Internet who are very concerned about the vulnerable group of depressed people who think that the airline's practice is discriminatory against depressed people. But I don't think it's discrimination, and we can't put the rest of the aircraft at risk just to take care of one person's emotions.

The depressed patient took some drugs at the time and had a physical abnormality, and there was no rule stating that the depressed patient could not fly, but the right to refuse to board was left to the captain of the flight to make a judgment based on various factors. The captain usually strictly excludes factors that pose a threat to safety from the flight, and the captain has the right to make the decision to deny boarding if the passenger is emotionally volatile at the scene.

The airline does not have the right to refuse boarding. If the depressed person has purchased a ticket and service from the airline, the airline is obliged to carry out the responsibility between the purchase of the ticket and the termination of the ticket.

The airline does not have the right to refuse. Because everyone has the right to fly, airlines can't take away the rights of others.

Airlines do not have the right to refuse, because people with depression are also human beings and need to fly to various places, and they cannot refuse to carry people because they are depressed.

The right to refuse, because the airline also has to think about other people, so for some special passengers have the right to refuse.