Universities focus on mastering the knowledge of debate drafts

People say that to live and learn from old age, we must have the concept of lifelong learning. The purpose of studying now is to increase my knowledge and improve day by day. In order to make your daily life fulfilling and meaningful.

Study hard now for the present, not for the future. Today's work is done today, which also tells us this truth, live every day now, instead of thinking about tomorrow forever.

Thinking too much about tomorrow and thinking about the future will disturb the mind of studying now, distract our attention, and be detrimental to our learning. That would become a fantasy rather than a real action.

If he says that studying is for the future, you can refute him, because our teachers all said that we should hurry up now, but we didn't say that we should hurry up tomorrow.

Learning is a happy thing, daily progress is what we look forward to, and the process of learning is the most important, not just looking at the results. I only learn when I see that I will succeed in the future, so many people who have failed in society, don't they learn?

Besides, success does not only depend on learning, not only on IQ, but also on many factors, such as a person's emotional intelligence, whether a person is honest and so on. Therefore, how can it be said that studying now is for the sake of success in the future? Learning now is for the sake of gaining and improving now.

With this quote about valuing the present time, remember that you want to emphasize that you need to make good use of your present time, learn what you need to learn now, and live every day now, not just thinking about tomorrow and succeeding.

From a personal point of view, the accumulation of knowledge can be regarded as a learning process, while ability refers to the subjective conditions necessary for the successful completion of an activity. In other words, competence development is the development of a person's ability to complete an activity, which can be regarded as the process of cultivating practical experience. In the return debate, isn't it the learning process and the practical experience training, which is more important?

It seems that the term practical experience is not very accurate, so let's put it this way. So let's see whether it is more important to apply what we have learned or more practical and important to put it into practice! First of all, the purpose of learning accumulation is definitely to use.

Whether it is the development of practice or theory, we should agree with this viewpoint. The purpose of capacity building is to use. The ultimate goal of the two is not contradictory, and there is no chicken or egg first.

I suddenly felt that this argument can be explained by giving this example: that is, knowledge accumulation teaches you 1+1=2, and ability development deduces from 1+1=2 to 10+10=20. It seems to be the truth.

In other words, competence development is based on the accumulation of knowledge. But this alone is not credible. Never heard of a house basement to buy a large price, the basis is not the more important reason, but can be used as an illustration to confuse the public.

Ability is the psychosomatic energy that people show by relying on their own intelligence, knowledge, skills, etc. to understand and transform the world. In fact, in the final analysis, knowledge accumulation is the ability to walk, and ability training is the ability to jump. If ability building is regarded as more important than knowledge accumulation, it is to pull out the seedlings and promote growth, and to do things against the law.

We should not deny the ability training, but affirm the other party, saying that he is important, because the debate itself is a more important issue, but once it comes to comparison, we must tell them that college students, everything in class, experiments, internships, etc., is the accumulation of knowledge, not ability training or ability training only accounts for a part. The definition of competency development itself is relatively abstract, and I think it is inevitable that it will be one-sided, and there must be a big discussion in your team. That's all I can think of right now, and I want to add to it.

1.In school, you have to prepare for employment, and after graduation, you have to compete with other talents with many years of work experience, and you can't do it without excellent professional knowledge and skills. The competition in society is very fierce, if you don't have good professional knowledge, you don't have a good use of your professional knowledge, then you will be eliminated by the society because of this, it would be a pity, originally everything can be very good, but you don't work hard to learn professional knowledge, the truth is so simple, but many people ignore it, so in the end you can only accept the fact of failure.

Every student should grasp the present and learn their major well.

2.Books are hated less when they are used. Even if we find a job after graduation, we can't do it when the time comes, and it is not possible to work and study at the same time, only when we grasp the opportunity in school and learn professional knowledge, we will make our career smoother and let us get closer to success.

The reason why many successful people succeed is because they learn professional knowledge well and are very professional, rather than relying on luck, so if you want to succeed, it is more important to rely on luck and strength.

I don't think there's a conflict between the two!

1.College students are a transition time from school to society, and if they don't exercise now, do they have to wait until they graduate and start exercising until they suffer hardships?

2.College is different from middle school, there are no classes all day and night, so naturally there is a lot of free time, so why not use it to do something meaningful for the future.

3.After more than ten years of hard study, do we still have to be a nerd?

After thinking about it briefly, I hope it will help you.

Add some: 4The theoretical knowledge we have learned can guide our practice, but these theories are not necessarily applicable to our practical activities, and practice is the only criterion for testing the truth.

Therefore, I believe that college students should focus on practice. I guess practice and exercise is a meaning.

Adversity.. Come.

process words. The format is not passable, and there will be different changes to the schedule. However, there is generally no shortage of the stages of the first debate, the argument, the inquiry, the free debate and the summary of the four debates. Some may change the interrogation into two parts: cross-examination and argument, and the first debate will make a summary of the cross-examination after the cross-examination; There are also those who omit the interrogation stage, starting with 1234 debates one by one, and then directly enter the free debate (such as the 93 International Collegiate Debate Tournament), but this format seems to be no longer commonly used; There are also some competitions with free agents...

And so on and so forth. Tips for learning:

Ask the landlord to move to the debate, or the Chinese debate network, or go to the bookstore to find some books related to the debate. A lot, I won't repeat it here.

Debate: ...==

It's everywhere.。。 For example, men and women are more annoying; Whether Gaoxin can raise integrity, whether Journey to the West is a tragedy or a comedy, whether pigs are smarter than people or people are smarter than pigs; And so on and so forth.

If you are a beginner, you can start with comparative propositions... Although arguing and arguing will find that it is not interesting. But it's useful.

Four: Doom... It's a painful process.

The landlord searched on the Internet.,There should be a lot.,Because it's not a new question.。。

You're asking too hard a question, isn't it? You should take a look at the original defense case, which is more in line with the actual specialty, and there are too many procedures for the debate competition, such as the 2000 full defense process: the first defense of the positive side, the first defense of the opposing side, the second defense of the positive side, the second defense of the opposing side, the third defense of the positive side, the third defense of the opposing side, the summary of the positive side, the summary of the opposing side, the free debate, the fourth defense of the opposing side, and the four defense arguments of the positive side.

I never understand the so-called debating skills, why do you enumerate so much, extreme fallacies, analogies, examples, logical inferences. In fact, the various techniques overlap with each other, and there is not much point in enumerating them.

As for the debate topic: the previous national debates have all debated the strait, and the debate topics are put together, there are enough ten.

Debating skills.

1) Leverage strength.

2) Grafting.

3) Push the boat down the river.

4) Cleaning up the source.

5) Draw salary from the bottom of the kettle.

6) Attack the key points.

7) Take advantage of contradictions.

8) "Lead the snake out of the hole".

9) "Li Dai Tao Stiff".

10) Delaying the army.