I hate the company management system more and more, and I need humanized management there all day lo

In the process of continuous development of society, employees are more and more expected to be treated by humane, and companies with humanized management are often more able to win the heartfelt maintenance of employees. However, there is a big difference between humanized management and no management system, and the two sides cannot generalize.

The humanized management advocated by people in modern society is based on the original management system of the enterprise, and from the perspective of humanization, to give employees more humane care and understanding. This does not mean that the management system within the company is in vain, but that the management system has greater flexibility in some aspects.

It is difficult for me to agree with the statement that the company's humanized management is that there is no management system. Because the difference between a company that is managed by a human face and a company that is not managed is too big, and the two sides cannot be compared on many levels.

For a company without a management system, all internal affairs of the company are decided according to the likes and dislikes of the leader, and employees can only choose to comply or leave. Once you encounter a leader who is not strong enough or is well thought out, the whole company will become a miasma, all aspects will be chaotic, and it is very easy to have cronyism, and it is difficult for the company to go uphill.

For the company with humanized management, the enterprise management system is still the cornerstone of enterprise management, and humanization is only manifested in some aspects. For example, according to the company's regulations, employees only have three days of bereavement leave, beyond which they will be treated as personal leave. Humanized companies will be flexible according to the distance of employees from home, and if the employee's family is far away, he can apply for a day or two of travel time, which is also free of charge.

In fact, there are not many aspects of the so-called humanized management in real life, and in most cases, the company's normal management system still runs through the entire management process. However, this is the humanized management that can be given to employees in some special time periods, which will allow the company to gain more gratitude from employees and make employees have a greater sense of belonging to the company.

Whether a company can achieve humanized management determines the mobility of employees within the company to a certain extent. Whether this humanized management is the process of the whole company or the leadership style of some grassroots leaders, the company will become a beneficiary.

I strongly disagree with this statement, no management system is to say that the company does not have a clear management regulations for employees, employees in the company can do whatever they want, ignoring the existence of leadership, the company's humanized management refers to the company can be properly relaxed, can have their own activities of the time, the management will not be too squeezing employees.

Personally, I think this statement is not quite correct, the company's humanized management is to be able to understand the life of employees, do not deduct employees' wages, so that employees can rest normally, and do not let employees work overtime during non-working hours, but it does not mean that the company does not have its own management system.

I don't agree with this statement, no matter which company is in need of humanized management, it does not mean that there is no management system, such a statement is not rigorous.

Because state-owned enterprises are usually the kind of people who can do it, because the requirements for the comprehensive quality of subordinates are not particularly high, they will not use the flat and agile organizational structure that many enterprises will use now. In the past, the employees of state-owned enterprises basically did not resign easily, but now the post-90s generation is the kind of freewheeling, I think you are not good, I will resign, therefore, resulting in the loss of many state-owned enterprises is particularly serious, the company has a phenomenon of one person and multiple positions, employees must be unbalanced, and the work efficiency is slow.

Secondly, the low work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is still the reason for people and management, as far as I am concerned, no one has ever treated the enterprise as their own home to operate, no one really cares how much the enterprise will profit, how to reduce costs, improve efficiency, all want to climb up by themselves, as long as nothing happens is the best. First of all, safety is always the most important, and we all work with a mentality that does not seek merit, but seeks no fault, so that the efficiency of work will definitely be particularly slow.

Although state-owned enterprises are equivalent to an iron rice bowl, their wages are not very high. When I first entered, I started as an ordinary employee, and if I wanted to get out, I had to get up at least ten years later, and the most important thing was whether I could rise after ten years, I couldn't say. Ten years later, I have entered middle age, and it will be very difficult to change jobs.

Therefore, some people enter state-owned enterprises just as a transition, looking for a good springboard, after working for a few years, accumulating work experience, and combining their own abilities, to go to a small company as a small leader.

In state-owned enterprises, there are a lot of nepotistic groups, such as whose relatives are this, whose sister is it, this kind of relationship is particularly tangled, because if you offend one person, it is equivalent to offending many people. Therefore, no matter in the first job, you must do your job well.

Why do we want to be productive?

What is the purpose of high productivity? In order to sacrifice your time as much as possible to create higher profits for your boss?

What is the purpose of a humane system? Isn't it to make employees a little more human?

High work efficiency is often to tool employees to the extreme, which is anti-human. Humanization and efficiency are a pair of fundamental contradictions, and the two cannot be both, but can only be balanced.

I myself oppose the pursuit of efficiency, we live to enjoy the beauty of life, not to make money for the boss.

The so-called humanized management is a management mode that pays full attention to the elements of human nature in the whole enterprise management process and takes the full exploration of human potential as its own responsibility. Including respect for people, full material and spiritual incentives, providing people with a variety of growth and development opportunities, focusing on the win-win strategy of enterprises and individuals, and formulating career planning for employees.

Humanized management methods.

Emotional management.

Emotional management is to pay attention to people's inner world, according to the characteristics of emotional plasticity, tendencies and stability to manage, the core of which is to stimulate the enthusiasm of employees and eliminate the negative emotions of employees.

Democratic management.

Democratic management is about involving employees in decision-making. If you involve others in decision-making, that is, listen to their opinions, you will not only not hurt their self-esteem, but will also improve their morale, and the more people who are consulted, the higher people's morale. Democratic management requires entrepreneurs to brainstorm ideas.

To run a business, we must concentrate the wisdom of the majority of people and operate with all employees, otherwise we will not achieve real success. In order to truly democratize management, it is also necessary to establish a mechanism for the association between enterprises and employees, such as allowing employees to hold a certain amount of shares is one of the better methods.

Self-management. Self-management can be said to be a further development of democratic management, which is to the effect that employees independently formulate plans, implement control, and achieve goals according to the development strategy and goals of the enterprise, that is, "manage themselves by themselves". It can combine the will of the individual with the unified will of the enterprise, so that everyone can contribute to the enterprise in a comfortable mood.

Cultural management. Cultural management is the highest level of humanized management, which enables employees to form common values and common behavioral norms through the cultivation of corporate culture and the promotion of management culture mode. Cultural management gives full play to the culture to cover people's psychology, physiology, people's current situation and history, and comprehensively displays the people-centered management idea. Culture is a set of common standards, norms and models formed by certain collective shared ideals, values and codes of conduct, so that individual behavior can be accepted by the collective.

The original intention of humanized management of enterprises is to respect people, fully material and spiritual incentives, and provide people with various opportunities for growth and development, which can be detailed through specific cases.

As far as management is concerned, management is the system, since it is a system, in many aspects of management, there is no such thing as "humanization". If the enterprise has formulated a system, but it is very much in the implementation of various management systems, then it is easy to cause employees to have inertia, negativity, and even a lot of complaints in the work!

To run a business is to run a business. The operator is the three major needs of the operator. That is, material, honor, spiritual. Enterprises rely on emotion, development depends on mechanisms, and culture depends on making them bigger! Enterprises must also enter the market. Helping employees build themselves is the greatest help to him.