Why did NATO use MiG 29 and F16 fighters after the merger of Germany and the West, and as a result,

There is no such thing as hanging up and fighting, and it is true that there are winners and losers in martial arts.

First of all, there was a big gap between the small batch of MiG-29s equipped by the Air Force of the East German People's Army and the MiG-29s used by the Soviet front-line air force. In the 80s of the last century, the MiG-29A of the front-line air force of the USSR Air Force was equipped with the 9-12 type, and the MiG-29, which was supplied to East Germany and other Warsaw Pact member states, was a relatively inferior Type 9-12A (of course, it was sold to Iraq and other countries) The MiG-29 of the family was the next monkey version of the 9-12B, also known as the "Third World type"). Compared with the former Soviet MiG-29, the MiG-29 of the GDR was simplified in the following aspects:

The N019E fire control radar lacks some of the operating modes of the N019 radar used by the Soviet Army (the TWS mode may be missing); The SPO-15LE RWR (Radar Warning System) simplified the original SPO-15L, while the identification antenna still uses the SRZO, which could be cracked by the US military-2M "Nickel" system, while the Soviet army itself has been upgraded to the Parol-1D system; <>

In addition, the MiG-29A also added the "Gardenia" built-in integrated ECM to subsequent upgrades. The upgraded MiG-29 is called the 9-13 version, but the MiG-29A in Warsaw has not been upgraded. NATO uses the MiG-29 to combat F16 ultra-close dogs.

What was the result of the f16 being beaten? After the end of the Cold War, the Luftwaffe conducted several air combat exercises with NATO F-16A C fighters, and MiG-29 fighters were also at hand. It was also noted (mainly from the Air Force side) that the MiG-29 had participated in air combat exercises with the US F-15C.

The NATO Air Force can relatively maintain its flight speed at a flight speed of about 27 kilometers, and the envelope center is generally maneuverable (the performance of the envelope area is not as good as that of the F-16), and the climb performance is excellent (it is said that the climb performance is much better than that of the F-15C); Although there is no fly-by-wire system, it is well maneuverable, and its body is very agile and flexible. <>

It is considered no less than the F-18C fighter with a fly-by-wire control system. However, the handle of the supersonic range was reduced, which affected the normal mesh. When using the R-73 air-to-air missile, due to poor radar performance and cumbersome operation, the off-axis angle of attack with helmet sights will be relatively large, the performance of the on-board computer will be weak, and the medium-range air combat capabilities of the MiG-29 are very poor (it is not good to play BVR with the R-27R).

In general, the confrontation of the NATO Air Force with the F-16A C basically reflects NATO's assessment of the F-16A C. In the medium-range engagement phase, the MiG-29 generally lagged behind. In the hand-to-hand combat phase, both sides will win in the middle of the envelope.

However, as the scissor battle continues, the advantages of the MiG-29 can gradually become apparent, and its helmet-mounted aiming system can be considerably better than Li's help, the MiG-29 is still a difficult opponent to deal with, but overall, it has fallen behind the mainstream NATO aircraft of the time. <>

It's mainly because of technology and capabilities. If his technique is strong and his ability is superb, he will not be beaten. It's because. The development strategy of this fighter was not as good as the previous one.

After the merger of Germany and the East, NATO used MiG-29 and F16 fighters, and as a result, F16 was beaten because of the huge disparity in their strength.

This is indeed the case, because the MiG-29 is very powerful, and the attack power is relatively strong.