Think about how the capitalists exploit and squeeze the proletarians?

The capitalists exploit and oppress the workers through surplus value. First, the workers work under the domination and supervision of the capitalists, and their labor is subordinate to the capitalists. Second, the product of labor also belongs to the capitalists.

The capitalist production process is not only a labor process for the production of use value, but also a process of value multiplication for the production of surplus value, and the process of value formation is the basis of the process of value multiplication. The process of value formation is the process of creating value through the abstract labor of laborers. Third, lowering and deducting wages is also an important tool commonly used by capitalists.

Fourth, capitalist production is the production of surplus value, and the essence of capitalists is profit-seeking, and capitalists will not do anything if production does not bring surplus value to capitalists. Therefore, the capitalist production process is not only a process of value formation, but must also be a process of value multiplication. Fifth, when inflation and prices are soaring, the capitalists deliberately postpone the date of payment of wages, or withhold workers' wages in the name of "safekeeping" and "savings".

The first is to employ child laborers and use low wages to generate income, secondly, to increase the workload and work hours, and then to formulate unreasonable regulations to deduct workers' wages and punish the proletarians.

The capitalists generally exploit and oppress the proletarians by extending the working hours of the laborer and then giving him as little wage as possible.

This is very simple, and a study of the simple reproduction of society leads to the conclusion that it is the workers who support the capitalists.

However, the establishment of this conclusion is limited to the system of political economy based on the labor theory of value, and it does not hold true if it is in the category of neoclassical microeconomics and macroeconomics.

So let's get started.

Now suppose an agricultural capitalist, who initially had a capital of 100 million, is now going to put his money into agriculture.

Agricultural capitalists, like other capitalists, go through a complex process of transformation, and the profits they obtain are at an average rate of profit'Multiply the prepaid capital k.

p'How did it come to be? Unlike other industries, p'and three kinds of land rents (absolute rent, that is, the rent to be paid for each leased land; Differential rent i, i.e., the rent paid more than the least available land because of its geographical location or fertility; Differential rent II, i.e., the super-profit resulting from the improvement of rented land, and of course rent, forms part of the value of agricultural products, but they are not produced by land, but by labour.

This labor is V+M, that is, the value of labor power and the surplus value. The value of labor power is wages (Marx's definition of labor value has limitations, so let's leave it alone), and surplus value is profit and rent. In the agricultural sector, surplus value is directly converted into profits and rents, rather than into average profits through the transfer of capital.

If you have studied microeconomics, you will understand the average profit: it is the economic profit of zero) This is because of the monopoly of private ownership of land, and this part of the difference is appreciated for yourself.

Although profits are not decoupled from the value of agricultural products in terms of quantity, due to the existence of landlords, capitalists can still only obtain average profits, otherwise the landlords will change to capitalists (fog).

Now we know that the capitalists can only make average profits in the agricultural sector. The average profit margin is assumed to be 20%. In this way, the annual profit of the capitalist is 20 million yuan.

Let's assume that we do this on a simple reproduction scale. In other words, the capitalists do not use any of it to expand production, but use it to buy Zhihu gift certificates (fog), assuming that people in this society can live by eating Zhihu gift certificates (fog). So what happens after 5 years of eating?

All the initial capital of the capitalist was given to Zhihu gift certificates, but he still had 100 million.

There is no doubt that the capitalists have no labor. But money has value, and where does that value come from? There is no doubt that, starting from the labor theory of value, no matter where the capitalist's capital comes from in the first place, it must eventually come from the worker.

How the capitalists exploit and oppress the proletarians. Let's say a capitalist hires you to work. Your day's wages.

What she wants in the kitchen, all she wants for you is the wages you earn, and you have to give him the money you earn. He's paying you. In him there are means of production.

You take the means of production of it. Go. Income.

People have received it for nothing, Gong money, you earn part of the salary, and he picks up part of the salary for nothing.

20 must-learn for graduate school entrance examination! Through the topic combined with the political examination point of the postgraduate entrance examination: the exploitation methods of capitalists to workers, it was analyzed and explained and shared with the students who took the postgraduate examination.

Because they pay taxes and the state also gets benefits, it is legal, and our country also stipulates that legitimate private property is protected from infringement, which also shows this.

Adopt oh thank you.

1. Capital. Capital is a measuring tool used to circulate substances after human production and labor are excessive. Originally, material was the capital that supplied all natural life for survival, until one day human production labor appeared to be available for exchange, so human beings created a tool for measuring the wealth of circulating and consuming material consumption - capital.

Capital is created by human beings, and it will surely serve the development of human society. However, the ultimate ruler of capital is a very small number of people in human society [statistics show that 80% of the world's wealth is dominated by 20% of the people], so these people are like a "snowball" pushing capital bigger and bigger. Therefore, capital must expect others to serve to strengthen itself.

2. Laborers.

The society tells everyone that "work more" everyone believes, and everyone hopes to be able to get more harvest through more work, so you feel tired of the work he does, he feels tired of the work and he does, so the workers who are afraid of losing their jobs consciously step by step on the road of tireless work.

3. Society. What does society need? There is a need to provide more low-cost, high-quality consumable wealth, so society expects each worker to work longer and more efficiently per unit of working time in his lifetime.

Therefore, the management of social labor relations often turns a deaf ear to the affairs outside the window, and overtime has become a social custom.

**It is the final withdrawal of the supply relationship, and the same is true for wages and benefits. At present, the policy is mainly aimed at large enterprises, and large enterprises will be punished by labor laws if they do not comply, and slowly make large enterprises make changes. The large enterprise Yan Zhengye has slowly changed to improve the attractiveness of talents, and many small enterprises with poor welfare benefits will not be able to recruit people, so they will be forced to improve their welfare benefits.

This conduction process is not that fast.

There are many ways in which the capitalists intensify the exploitation of workers' surplus value, and there are two main ones: one is to extend the working hours, and the other is to increase the intensity of labor.

Extending working hours is the most common technique used by capitalists. They often extended the working hours of the workers to twelve, fourteen, sixteen, or even longer. Anyway, in order to squeeze more oil and water out of the workers, they were eager to ask the workers to work twenty-four hours a day.

So in the old society, the working hours of the workers were very long.

In ordinary factories and mines, workers have to work at least 12 hours a day, some 17 or 8 hours, and some are not necessarily at all, anyway, forcing workers to work to death. People say that the workers at that time were "not to welcome the sunrise when they go to work, and not to send the sunset when they get off work", which is really true.

To figure this out, we need to assume a case. Suppose there is a company, the boss invests money to create it, the management helps the boss share the cake, and the bottom layer is responsible for creating value, that is, making the cake. The boss slipped his hand and took three-quarters, and the management divided three-quarters, that is, the original three-sixteenth, and the remaining one-sixteenth was divided by the low-level employees.

But to put it bluntly, the producer of the cake is the bottom employee, and the money invested by the boss will not flow into the hands of anyone other than himself, but the boss can use the money to squeeze the value of the bottom.

This question is also true when we look at society. People in the position of less than 1 income, 99% of the wealth of the creation of society. The capitalists fish by working capital, and the rest are the fishermen Chi Tong.

The fish in the lakes of society seem to belong to everyone, but the fish harvested are basically divided among the capitalists. The rest of the people will have enough to eat. Overtime is the way for capital to further capture social wealth, and the most direct feeling is that workers' wages and labor are overdrawn.

In this way, we will find that the accumulation of capital is getting bigger and bigger, and ordinary people without capital will always be ordinary people. This is the root cause of the gap between the rich and the poor in society. Don't listen to those who are the original sin of poverty, that poverty is the fault of laziness or that ** restricts poverty, to put it bluntly, it is the beautification of capital.

In fact, the poor tend to work harder to survive, while the channels of wealth are controlled by capital.

However, if a society continues like this, disasters will occur in the long run, and Japan's social problems are an example of this.