What is the difference between an only child and a sibling?

Judging from the current social situation, there is still a big gap between the two kinds of children in terms of personality between only children and children with siblings, and there are many differences. There are many reasons for this, such as: family environment, living environment, things encountered are different, etc.

1. The gap in independence.

The independence of personality is also a very obvious difference between an only child and a child with siblings. For children with siblings, their independence will be better. Mainly because of the family environmentFor an only child, he will be more doted on by his parents, and he will have a strong dependence in ordinary life.

For children with siblings, it is common to not get much love, pampering, and care from their parents. Whatever you encounter in life is usually solved by yourself, and over time, your independence will become stronger.

2. The personality is more optimistic.

Compared to the optimism of the character, I thinkChildren with siblings will have a slight advantage. Because their living environment will be more joyful, with the company of brothers and sisters, then life will become more exciting, and life will become happier. But for only children, many children are more introverted and then live in depression every day, so it is better to be an only child than to be optimistic.

Nowadays, there are many single-child families and families with siblings, and they want to make their children's lives happier. Then parents' care for their children is also a very important link. Therefore, no matter what kind of family it is, the care of children must not be underestimated.

The personality of the children in these two families is definitely different, the children of only children are more withdrawn and lonely, and the families with siblings are more cheerful.

It also depends on the growth and education environment, and it is difficult to say what is the difference between the personalities of only children and non-only children.

The personality of an only child will be a little more independent, and he will be used to doing everything by himself from an early age, and a child with siblings will be a little more outgoing.

Only children are more likely to be selfish and self-centered, while children with siblings are more likely to take care of other people's emotions and love to share with others.

Usually only children have a willful personality and are reluctant to share with others. And children with siblings are not only helpful but also cheerful.

If you have brothers and sisters, your heart will be more open, the family is always lively, and the only child is always yourself, and you are prone to autism.

An only child may be a little more fragile inside, and siblings can help each other.

Looking at this question, there is really no way to calm down. I didn't dare to think too much, and when I thought too much, tears rolled in my eyes.

There is a saying that if you don't suffer from few, you will suffer from inequality.

Because people who have brothers and sisters, the biggest motivation to survive when they are young is to compete for the love of their parents.

As for only children, they can enjoy all the love of their parents for the rest of their lives, without much effort.

In most cases (except in a few cases), there is a big difference between a child with a sibling and an only child. As an older sister with a younger brother, the person concerned can really feel it very clearly.

It is not the kind of difference that can be seen at a glance, but the most subtle and deadly difference that flows into the bone marrow and melts into life.

The self-confidence of being an only child and the light of being loved by my parents wholeheartedly are simply heart-piercing to me.

They were born with a golden spoon in their mouths. They don't have to compete for favor like us, force themselves to be excellent, and swallow the tears of grievance in one gulp. There is no way, he still has younger siblings to take care of, and he still has older siblings to be tolerated.

Especially the eldest of the siblings, he has to force himself to be sensible since he was a child.

Years of grievances, in exchange for understanding, often lie in a detail, a look, a macro hole, an action, a sentence.

This kind of sensibility is generally a growth of necessity.

Most of the only children, because they are surrounded by their parents' all-in-one, almost doting love, and raise a subconscious self-centeredness, subconsciously do not consider others, that kind of willfulness, that kind of arrogance that is pampered by presumptuousness, I can't experience it in my life.

An only child can be selfish, self-willed, and even have a big temper when he is loved, without scruples.

I think there are good rentals and bad ones. There are pros and cons. Children with siblings are not lonely.

The money of the slow sedan car may be worse than that of an only child. I think that's it. An only child can get all the love of his parents.

And parents with siblings may prefer which child they prefer, and only children will not have such a thing.

Children with brothers and sisters, they will know how to share better than Dunazi, because they have lived in this family of many children for a long time, Li Quanhe must learn to share, because if you don't share in daily life, there will be a lot of contradictions, if you are an only child, he is the baby of the family, and he may be more arrogant than Qihuai in character, of course, only a few people.

There are pros and cons between the two, children with siblings will have less burden when their parents have funnel disease in the future, however, there will be conflicts in inheritance, and the burden of children who return to the child is heavier, but the inheritance is inherited independently. These differences are also very large.

Children with siblings like to share their good things, will help others, have compassion, and will be less selfish; And many only children are more selfish than Niantuan, especially for what they like.

The above is not authoritative, it has a lot to do with family education and environment! Some are not like that!

Children with siblings are more kind and cohesive. The only child, on the other hand, will be more solitary and will not like to share.

The former is not lonely, but will unite and love; The latter enjoys exclusive family love, but is prone to arrogance.

Of course, it will be different, because there are brothers and sisters in the process of becoming imitation wax, in the face of brothers and sisters, they will inevitably be prepared to deal with various relationships, and will know more about coordination and business, humility and respect. Although the only child has enjoyed the love of his parents since he was a child, he has to face everything alone, and he is relatively lonely and selfish, which is caused by the growth environment. With the entry into society, the generation of only children shows that they are well educated, have an independent character, and can take responsibility, and they are already the backbone of society, worthy of this era.

An only child will be more lonely and lonely, but an only child can get all the love of his parents, and the only child will live a more comfortable life, because for children with siblings, parents may prefer a child who is stupid, and treat them unequally.

Usually, the only child's walking ant growth environment is relatively quiet. This also creates their autistic personality. But those who have siblings are generally more cheerful. Lively,

Usually an only child can be lonely and he is the only one in the family. There is no one to play with him, and if there are brothers and sisters, the family will generally be more lively.

As I understand it. With the liberalization of the two-child policy, many families have bid farewell to the title of "only child" and stepped into the ranks of "non-only children". Then this generation, many are only children because of family planning.

Some people say that "only children" are more pampered by their parents, and no one will take away what belongs to them since they were young, so they don't know how to share, which leads to these people being very selfish. It is also said that "with non-only children" because some parents will favor their sons, resulting in sons being very domineering and daughters having low self-esteem. The growth environment of "only child" and "non-only child" is not the same, so will there be a difference between them when they grow up?

Let's take a look at the personal experience of netizens first:

Lazy: The only daughter of my classmate, I didn't score as much as me in the college entrance examination, but I could choose the university I liked, and I could only leave the opportunity to my younger brother. My friend's only daughter, my parents gave money for the house and the car, and I was out of the house, and the money was for my younger brother's marriage.

Relatives are only daughters, there is no money for parents to give, half of the children are raised by their parents, I can only be careful and save a part of the filial piety to my parents, don't say anything he gnaws on the old you are self-reliant, self-reliance is forced out, who is uncomfortable who knows.

Sister Struggle: I'm an only daughter, but my parents don't want anything, the salary before marriage is handed over except for what I spend, and I have to take care of my own small family after marriage, but I always have to buy something for my parents during the New Year's holidays, the old man helps take care of the children, and there is no monthly salary, so it is too raw, but it is also a little today and a little tomorrow, and basically does not let the old man move his own moneySometimes my parents are anxious and say that the money is for the children, and I don't save any money, either I have the opportunity to return it to my parents in the future, or I really leave it to the children, and the same is true for my mother-in-law, I don't ask for a bride price, and my husband's money is given as much as I want, all for my own family, and my mother-in-law's money is not a penny, and I return it if I give it.

Although there are only one or a few siblings between "only children" and "non-only children", the difference in their upbringing is very large. Many "only children" envy that they have siblings to play with "non-only children", but "with non-only children" envy the better living conditions of "only children".

Those who have siblings have family affection and dependence, and will help each other, and the only child has a strong ability to be independent.

Not the same. The good thing is that they are not lonely, and if the age gap between the two people is not large, they can play with each other and be companions. The bad part is that you need a bowl of water to be level, because there will be comparisons with each other, and it is easy to produce jealousy or other negative emotions.

If the age gap is too large, there is a generation gap.

Should it be a little different? If you have siblings, you should be diligent, think more about others, save more, and in short, think more about your parents.

Yes, children who grow up with brothers and sisters talk about unity, have compassion, and know tolerance and tolerance, but only children do not have these, and they are the most serious for me.

Of course, for example, the post-90s generation is basically an only child, and they are used to the whole family revolving around themselves, so it is easier to be selfish, not easy to consider others, and if you have brothers and sisters, you will naturally have a problem getting along, at least you will not only think about yourself, but naturally you have to think about others.

An only child is too lonely, used to a life where no one fights and no one grabs, I have an older brother, my parents are very good to me, I think it's very good, what can I discuss with my brother in the future, my parents can still walk around between us when they are old, this is a relative.

It's different, those who have siblings will compete for favor, and only children will not compete for favor.

The same is different in the individual, in the family, the words and deeds of the parents. Is it strange that an only child is still a **?

Not the same Children who are not only children are obviously more thoughtful.

I think this is also cultivated by various families, and there is no difference between an only child or a large number of brothers and sisters.

The cultivation of each family is different, and the children's personalities are also different, I am just a son, modest and low-key, loves to learn, is very sensible, and is not selfish.

This is related to family education, this is education, whether there are sisters or not is not directly related, I think only children will be happier in the future,

Of course it's different, it's completely different in nature.

Of course it will, but if there are too many people, it will be chaotic.

will be more considerate of others, not selfish, and will first consider whether it will affect others in everything you do.

It's no different, after getting married, each living his own life.

It's going to be different, if it were me I'd have two.

In fact, it depends on how parents educate them.

and his sister formed a star observation group, Tong.