100 points and then add to find accurate translation into Chinese!

Updated on amusement 2024-03-18
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    A long lost art in the film EditingAugust XXVIII, 2006 Paulhd for India and DV Guru both with Jessica Winter in the Boston Globe an article about "Lost Art Film Clip" today. I didn't try to do the winter with Jessica. I liked her article a lot, and I agree with her sigh that it seems to have lost a few days of time in American cinema.

    But I think the reason for the notice article is a little bit more. I hope you can forgive the long band (pun intended) article. I'm frank enough to admit guilty to a "slow" movie or two, so I guess you could say that I have some investment issues.

    Is the movie choppier and choppier these days? Absolute. I think we can all agree.

    If you disagree, I'm sure if anyone thinks they might be able to prove this compared to the bordwellian analysis, the average cut per second for movies of the 50s and 2000s, respectively. (Sorry, man.) It won't be me.

    But the argument of that article is that the speed of cutting is fast as a result: a) the development of digital technologyb) is being made from TV producers. I think there are other reasons, I don't know the above or even inevitably.

    The first part argues that "" is an argument that most of us have heard before the movie. This is the "old romantic way" saying. Really, digital technology has undoubtedly accelerated the physical splicing of the decision-making process.

    But cutting speeds (building a movie in less time) do not produce fast cutting speeds (per second). Because movies are a waste of time, if someone needs a lot of cuts, they can always make movies. Eisenstein's face, the ending of Bonnie and Clyde and Brackaki's window water baby moving are just three examples of the lightning-fast cutting of the film's extended sequence.

    All the movies that were cut off before the invention of the personal computer, less Final Cut Pro.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    A long-lost art film Editingaugust 28, 2006 India and DVGURU both with Jessica Winter Boston "Cinema Lost Art" today by Paul Earth article. I have no ulterior motives Jessica Winter. I liked her article very much, and I agreed with her lamenting that Changtian seemed to have lost participation in American films.

    But I would like to inform that the reasoning of the article is a bit excessive. I hope you will forgive me for the long shots (pun intended) of my article. I'm frank about admitting a "slow" movie or two, so I guess you could say that I've invested in some movies these days in choppier and choppier?

    Sure. I think we can all agree on that. If you disagree, I'm sure if anyone thinks they might be able to justify a movie per second by some kind of bordwellian analysis of this film, compared to the average cut of the 50s and 00s, respectively.

    Sorry, folks are not going to be me) but the argument of the article is that the result of the faster cutting is: a) the development of digital technology b) the filmmakers in the transition from thinking that there are other reasons, I don't know above or even necessarily part of the first parameter, "a" is a statement that most of us have heard before in the film. This is the saying of "The Romance of the Alder Path".

    Admittedly, digital technology has undoubtedly made the process of physical splicing undoubtedly faster. But cutting faster (less time to build a movie) won't produce faster cuts (per second). Just because movie editing is time-consuming, if someone thinks a lot of cuts, they can always make a movie.

    Eisenstein's Potemkin, Bonnie and Clyde and Stan Brakhage's Window, The End of the Water Baby Movement, and a film with lightning-fast cutting extended sequences are just three examples. Movies, as well as the invention of the personal computer, were all cut off before much less Final Cut Pro.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The average household spends about one-sixth of their income on food. Because food is expensive, it's important to spend money wisely when buying things. Careful shoppers can prepare nutritious, tasty and tasty meals cheaply.

    Just buy food, you don't need to buy extra food. There are several ways to do it. First, make the shopping list at the store where you go.

    Finally, if you can. If you go with children, they often ask you to buy unnecessary food, like candy. In a word, attentive consumers try to get as much nutritious food as they can for each doliar. Hope to adopt.

Related questions
5 answers2024-03-18

Man's best friend.

Almost everyone loves dogs, and almost everyone loves to read stories about dogs. >>>More

24 answers2024-03-18

The computer display is displayed with a matrix (that is, many points of horizontal and vertical), if it is a straight line, it will not produce sawtooth, if it is a diagonal line, it will be generated, for example, the following figure is the word and its skimming on the upper part of the obvious sawtooth phenomenon, the so-called anti-aliasing is to smooth the processing of this edge, then it needs to calculate more data, and the ability of graphic processing needs to be stronger. >>>More

7 answers2024-03-18

A general commentary on ancient Chinese literature.

11 answers2024-03-18

My own children use LG, and I feel that it is generally good to support LG.

3 answers2024-03-18

Since the beginning of the new century, the development of the national nuclear industry strategic adjustment, China's nuclear power installed capacity will exceed 40 million kilowatts of installed capacity of nuclear power will account for 5 of the total power generation capacity by 2020. After nearly 30 years of development and construction, China is basically a "combination of Chinese and foreign, we take the initiative and the development of nuclear power." "The beginning of Haiyang City, Shandong and Zhejiang Sanmen nuclear power plants as the representative of the third generation of nuclear power industry in China Construction Bank spring has arrived. >>>More