Is it possible for life to live on the nucleus inside the atom?

It is possible, imagine the structure of the solar system, the sun is firmly in the center of the galaxy, the eight planets revolve around the sun at high speed, this is not very much like the enlarged atomic structure, the earth is equivalent to the electrons of atoms, the sun is equivalent to the nucleus, maybe our galaxy itself is a huge atom, so it is not nonsense to think that there is life on the nucleus.

It is impossible to live because the basis of life requires water and protein, but there is no water and protein in the nucleus of the atom.

It is possible that life is alive because there are a lot of living substances found here, and there are many chemical elements on these nuclei.

The scale of the universe is infinite on both the macroscopic and microscopic scales, and it is impossible to have life on the scale of nanometers to tens of meters, and life does not necessarily need water, and it is not necessarily composed of atoms such as carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.

Ernest Rutherford, 1911.

The nucleus was discovered while validating Thompson's model of plum pudding.

The atomic nucleus is the main component of the atom, located in the ** of the atom, accounting for about the mass of the atom, the density of the nucleus is extremely large, the nuclear density is about 10 14g cm3. The nucleus of an atom is composed of uncharged neutrons and positively charged protons (the two types of baryons consist of 3 quarks.

composition). When there are an equal amount of electrons around it than the protons in it, it constitutes an atom. The nucleus of an atom is extremely small, as in the atomic radius of uranium.

The ratio of the radius of the nucleus is 26634, while the ratio of the radius of the nucleus of hydrogen is 60250. But in this tiny nucleus, the mass of the atom is concentrated.

There are mesons in the nucleus.

Shuttle back and forth between protons and neutrons (transfer of strong nuclear forces. , neutrons release - after the meson becomes a proton, soon the proton releases + the meson becomes a neutron, and the proton and neutron in the nucleus shuttle back and forth through the meson, and the transformation of each other is the mode of action of the strong nuclear force (see the figure below).

The sign in the figure represents the smallest unit of indivisible positive and negative electromagnetic information - qubits

Famous physicist John. John Wheeler famously said, "It from bit."

After the development of quantum information research, this concept was sublimated to the point that everything originates from qubits).

Note: Bits are bits.

Of course it's real. Rutherford's nuclear scattering experiments have proven this.

The nucleus was discovered in 1912 by British scientist Rutherford based on particle experiments that bombarded gold leaf.

The number in the figure represents the smallest unit of indivisible positive and negative electromagnetic information - qubits (Qubit) (name physicist John. Wheeler John Wheeler famously said, "It from bit."

After the development of quantum information research, this concept was sublimated to the point that everything originates from qubits) Note: Bits are bits.

This theory was once all the rage, including in Liu Cixin's science fiction **, where high-energy protons in the super collider collided with each other, revealing the secrets of the microscopic world, but "knocking out" the sky! This is a theory of micro nesting macro level! So is there a possibility?

1. Atoms are stars? Electrons are planets?

In fact, our early theory of the microcosm did have such a description, Rutherford's particle scattering experiment, most of the particle flow penetrated the golden wave, and only a small number of particles were bounced back!

Therefore, Rutherford believed that most of the space in the middle of the atom is empty, and the nucleus is in the middle! Based on this, Rutherford's atomic model was built!

Rutherford and Bohr's atomic models above, the electrons all orbit in their respective energy levels, which is very similar to the planetary orbit model in modern astronomical theory, and the nuclei also concentrate almost all the mass, and the stars in the solar system also occupy the mass of the entire solar system, so from some theoretical point of view, it seems that it can really be confirmed one by one? But with the understanding of the mode of operation of electrons within the nucleus, we have come to realize that this theory is wrong!

Because the position and velocity of the electrons cannot be determined at the same time, this is what came to be known as the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle quantum motion, so the correct atomic model is the atomic model with the nucleus in the center and the electron cloud around it! Do we live on electrons that can't hear how position and velocity are determined? This is clearly nonsense!

2. What if we live in an atom?

This will have a terrible consequence, because you must have discovered that our world is also made up of atoms, so will there be an infinite world in the middle loop? Or do you believe in Liu Cixin's science fiction **: our macrocosm is nested in the microcosm, and the understanding of the microcosm will start from our outermost universe, nested once, and solve the problem?

The understanding of high-dimensional space in "The Three-Body Problem" can turn a proton into an 11-dimensional state, and then etch various circuits required by the three-body person under this condition, and then reduce the dimension to a three-dimensional state after achieving the desired function, that is, a proton! But it can be high-dimensional in any position to achieve the desired purpose!

But in fact, it will not happen, because our macrocosm has no quantum effect, Newtonian classical mechanics is still dominant in daily life, even the relativistic theory of space-time bending, etc., only need to be quoted on specific occasions, and the world inside the atom is closely related to us, but it is inverted!

3. The world is macrocosmic.

Our world is macrocosm, but there are countless microcosms! Countless uncertain quantum motions are composed of a world of classical mechanics, no matter how many uncertain possibilities, in the macroscopic can only express one result, line or walk, only one can be chosen! Is it fun?

Of course, your brain hole is the uncertain factor!

In reality, this does not happen!

To say that we live in one organism is a bold idea.

Organisms, in the general understanding, can definitely move, or at least grow like plants. The universe is vast, not to mention the earth, even if the solar system is not worth mentioning in the entire universe at all, but it is still impossible to say that human beings live in the body of an organism.

1) The composition of this creature.

If humans really live in a giant creature, then this creature must have its composition. So what exactly does it consist of, or how does it survive?

For humans, there are various systems in the human body, such as the digestive system, respiratory system, nervous system. If there is such a creature, what kind of system is it made of? Is it the interplay of the relationships between the stars?

However, the current universe is almost a vacuum space, and there is no system.

2) There is no trace to be seen.

At present, scientists have not discovered any phenomena of extraterrestrial organisms that can be directly observed. Since human beings live in an organism, and no signs have been found at the current maximum observation boundary of more than 10 billion light years, it is too much to say.

3) Contrary to the current theory of the universe.

At present, the scientific community recognizes the theory of the birth of the universe as the big ** theory. And from the big ** theory, there has never been any mention of the existence of huge creatures.

The model of the grand theory of the universe can indeed explain most of the phenomena of the current situation. The current hypothesis is more like a fanciful idea, without any theoretical basis or factual argument.

To sum up, it is just a hypothesis to think that human beings live in an organism.

Albert Einstein is one of the world's greatest scientists, and many people believe that it was Einstein who helped the United States develop the atomic bomb and thus helped the United States end World War II. But in fact, Einstein himself was not directly related to the invention of the atomic bomb, but Einstein did deduce the huge amount of energy contained in the nucleus through the mass-energy equation, which prompted people to start in-depth research on atomic energy.

After Einstein proposed the special theory of relativity in 1905, he derived the mass-energy equation according to the Lorentz transform combined with the momentum kinetic energy theorem, which was used to explain the mass loss in the nuclear transformation reaction and the energy of particles in high-energy physics, people can make the most powerful ** in the history of mankind.

Einstein's theory by deriving the mass-energy equation is not that the energy contained in the nucleus of the atom is huge, but that any piece of matter is huge as long as it is converted into energy, whether it is a table, a teapot, or myself, as long as it is converted into energy, it is huge, not to mention the whole thing, even a little bit of a few hundredths of a percent will be a powerful energy. The principle of the atomic bomb comes from the research of nuclear physicists on the atomic nucleus, they discovered that there are protons and neutrons inside the atomic nucleus by bombarding the atomic nucleus, discovered the decay phenomenon of the atomic nucleus and the chain reaction of nuclear fission, and finally developed the atomic bomb.

It can be said that the appearance of the atomic bomb verified the correctness of the mass-energy equation proposed by Einstein, but the invention of the atomic bomb was not directly related to Einstein.

The phenomenon of fusion and fission of atoms, accompanied by a loss of mass, will release huge amounts of energy if viewed by the relativistic mass-energy equation; In terms of the fusion of the deacon nuclei into helium-4, if the sun was originally all deacon nuclei, then the mass of the solar nucleus is enough for the sun to burn for 30 billion years. Nuclear fusion was discovered by Australian scientist Mark Oliver in 1932; Nuclear fission was discovered by the German scientist Otto Hahn in 1938, after which mankind opened the door to atomic energy.

For example, for a neutron and a proton to be combined, they must be given energy greater than or equal to their binding energy to bind them together. When light nuclei fuse and heavy nuclei undergo fission, the binding energy of the nuclei is released through mass loss.

The energy inside the nucleus is mainly produced by fission, which is produced when it continues to expand in a closed environment.

It does not mean that there is a huge amount of energy in the nucleus, but that when the electrons outside the nucleus are separated from the protons in the nucleus, a huge amount of energy is generated, and these energies are naturally present in the nucleus.

Yes. An atom can have no neutrons (e.g., hydrogen atoms), but not protons. If there is no equilibrium between positively charged protons (neutrons are not charged) and electronically charged outside the nucleus, each atom will be unstable due to being negatively charged.