Is it okay for the 500D to be paired with a Tamron AF 70 200mm f 2 8 Di LD IF macro lens

Poisoned antivirus or reinstall the system.

The model should be a constant aperture zoom lens with no macro function.

And the zoom lens with macro imaging is not very good.

There should be no problem with this lens for Canon, and it should be clear when you buy it for Canon camera.

Upstairs, don't talk about it;

This is Tenglong's A001, with a 1:3 macro throughout the process, which is basically unparalleled in its kind;

Of course, the picture quality is a little worse than the original Xiaobai, but it is good enough;

It's no problem to use it, but the probability of the sub-factory lens is greater than that of the original, for example, mine is 24-70 on 500D, but it's very strange that the Tamron SP90 and A16 are not out of focus, on a 1DS I got to play, the original 600 yuan is not out of focus at all, but the original 9,000 yuan is running badly. Is it really irregular?

Therefore, if you want to use a sub-factory lens, you have to do a good job of the problem that may be out of focus, but in fact, the problem is not big, anyway, this kind of lens generally has to be on a tripod, so it will not be troublesome to fine-tune it after the focus is completed;

This lens does not have a macro function.

True 1:1 macro is generally only around 60 and 100 (105 for Nikon, 100 for Canon and others).

Others are just called to have a macro function.

70-200 is still the original one. Xiaobai: Or is Xiaobai, you will buy it sooner or later. Why waste this money.

This lens is similar to the specifications and uses of the original small bamboo cannon, and it is not stated that it is a macro lens, right? Its main feature is its large aperture and long focal length, which is generally used for portrait shooting. Since the longest focal length is only 200, it belongs to the medium and long photo range, so you should choose a focal length lens above 300mm for long-distance shooting.

Seeing your question downstairs, let me give you a suggestion by the way. 9000 budget, or D3200 set (or D5200 set) + little donkey cannon AF-S 70-300G if ed VR, this head can be auto-focused on the above two entry bodies, the image quality of the lens itself is good, **moderate, very suitable for entry-level use.

Macro is only a function, and the macro lens can also shoot other subjects, but it will be more "sharp". For example, Canon and Nikon's Baiwei are actually often used as portrait heads.

Autofocus, but no stabilization, it's better to buy Tamron's A009

The focus of the ordinary motor, the macro is still very powerful, and it is not bad now.

Approximate structure, 18 lenses, divided into 13 groups.

Licensed goods (with a three-year warranty) 5600-6300 or so.

Parallel imports: no warranty: about 5300.

In general, the imaging and compatibility with the original factory are higher, and the large aperture is sometimes false, and often the maximum aperture and the minimum aperture imaging of the lens have some problems, and the maximum aperture is usually closed by one or two stops, and the effect is better. If you want to blur the background, you can also refer to the information of my space, even F4 is very easy to do.

It depends on your needs Whether you pay attention to a large aperture or a Canon white cannon Personally, I recommend Xiaoxiaobai to hold it comfortably and feel good imaging.

Half of this focal length is for portraits, you can consider the Tamron with a large aperture, you can also consider the small black of Sigma, the cost performance is also very high, as for the little white, it is better to buy an is.

If you want to buy a large aperture, choose the Tamron 70-200 aperture, and if you pay more attention to the imaging style, buy the small white constant aperture 4.

An in-depth review of Hummingbird.com's Tamron lens.

Mowgli's Tamron sample review summary post.

The focusing speed is very fast, and there is not much difference from the original.

Both lenses are imaging on the dry side, and I'm not alone.

Both lenses are colors that are suitable for landscapes, and are not very suitable for portraits. (The portrait is a little stronger than the Sigma).

The color of the 2 lenses is said to be color cast, and I don't think much of it.

Both lenses are about the same bokeh, I really don't see much of a difference?! All of them have a slight dilinearity, and none of them are very moist. (I may be harsh on this, but it's actually pretty good).

Both lenses are fast and accurate in good light, which is completely acceptable.

Both lenses are slow to focus when the light is low, with the small steel cannon being the slowest and requiring a strong body motor to alleviate it. Like my previous D70 is very choking, and the version of the small dragon cannon with a motor focuses on the speed I don't think is much slower than the sleeve ultrasonic, but the focusing accuracy is not as good as ultrasonic, and the focus is hesitant, I found the problem after careful observation, the original ultrasonic focus can be seen from the window, after turning in one direction close to the focus, it can quickly swing left and right, very lightweight, good focusing accuracy, and the traditional motor driven, the rotation speed in one direction is very fast, it is a little difficult to brake close to the focus, and then reverse, Speed is mainly lost when it comes to repeatedly determining the precise focus.

In terms of sharpness of the 2 lenses, the difference between the small dragon cannon is around 135mm, while the difference between the small steel cannon is 150-200mm.

In terms of the weight of 2 lenses, I don't need to say it, I definitely carry the dragon cannon.

I can't compare the durability of the two lenses. Hehe, nothing is broken so far.

If I sue you directly for what to buy, it is called irresponsible! The sensory factors of lens selection are more than the evaluation of actual performance. Just want the user to be able to play to the strengths and avoid the weaknesses, saying that the original factory is good, but the original plot, pay attention, do you know what the plot is?

If you have really used a small bamboo cannon, you will also sigh that the small bamboo cannon is like that. There are not so many differences at all.

I don't want to say it directly because I don't want to cause a war of words. I said you buy a Tenglong, I'm not his trust, I said you buy a steel cannon, it's heavy and ugly, because the performance of the two is really similar. Take your pick.

I'm just telling the truth, to the point!

The original soup is turned into the original food, and the original machine is equipped with the original mirror.

Attached to the factory mirror, there is an anti-shake, and it can't compare to a small steel cannon.

The 3rd floor said that it was the same as not saying it, the Nikon original lens, the focusing speed is not very good, but it is definitely better than Tamron's, ** is also high!

Yes, the lens itself has a mechanical motor. Focus is slower than ultrasound. On the D5000, autofocus is possible.

In addition, Tamron and Nikon have better compatibility, and there are fewer phenomena such as out-of-focus.

The absence of a motor seems to have nothing to do with autofocus.