Is there any story about the debate, urgent!! 50

"Information Governance Guide".

King Zhao named his younger brother Zhao Sheng as the king of the plains. Plains is a good monk, and there are often thousands of diners under his door. Among them, there was a Gongsun Long, who was good at debating and researching "solid and white, the same and different", and the king of the plains respected him as a guest.

Kong Piercing came to Zhao from Lu State, and debated with Gongsun Long that "slaves and maids have three ears", Gongsun Long's defense was very subtle, and Kong Piercing could not answer, and he left after a while. The next day, he saw Pingyuanjun again, and Pingyuanjun asked, "Yesterday, Gongsun Long's exposition was the Tao, what do you think?"

I would like to ask you again: It is very difficult to argue that the three ears are not true; It's very easy to argue that two ears are true, and I wonder if you will choose the easy to be true, or the difficult to false? Hirahara-kun was also speechless.

The next day, Pingyuanjun said to Gongsun Long: "Don't argue with Kong Piercing anymore, his reasoning is better than words, and your words are better than words, and in the end you will definitely not have the upper hand." ”

Zou Yan passed by Zhao Guo, and Pingyuan Jun asked him to debate with Gongsun Long about the idea that "white horses are not horses". Zou Yan said, "No.

The so-called debate should distinguish between different types and not infringe on each other; Arrange different concepts without confusion; Express your intentions and general concepts, express your opinions, and let others understand, rather than be confused. In this way, the winner of the debate can stand his ground, and the unsuccessful can get the truth he seeks, and the debate can be carried out. If we use red tape as evidence, use clever words to slander each other, use flowery words to steal concepts, and attract others to make them lose the point, we will undermine the fundamental principle of learning.

That kind of entanglement, aggressiveness, and always asking others to admit defeat before they are willing to shut up, is harmful to the demeanor of a gentleman, and I, Zou Yan, will never participate. Everyone in the audience applauded in unison. Since then, Gongsun Long has been left out in the cold.

The story of the Prime Minister's outwitting of Western journalists.

A thousand waves. After the end of the Korean War, New China was not strong because it had just been founded, its foundation was poor, its foundation was weak, and the long-term attrition of the Korean War was not strong. At this time, the Western capitalist countries are even more inferior to others, do not take China seriously at all, and make things difficult for China in everything and everywhere.

Diplomacy is even more difficult, and the so-called lack of diplomacy in weak countries is even more prominent.

The interesting story of the war of words and outwitting Western journalists took place at this time.

It is said that at a press conference, in order to belittle China's image in the international community, Western reporters engaged in a wheel war against China, taking turns to ask all kinds of difficult and sharp questions to China, and delusionally imagining China's ugliness.

A British reporter asked: "People in rural areas in China use public toilets, so many of you in China, may I ask the Prime Minister, how many toilets are there in China?" "*** refreshingly authentic:

Two rooms". Two rooms". Western journalists were puzzled.

Said categorically: "Yes, two." One men's toilet and one women's toilet.

Western journalists were speechless.

When a German reporter saw that the British reporter could not take advantage, he then asked an even more pointed question: "You China said that it wants to build an atomic bomb, do you have the money?" Excuse me, Prime Minister, how much money do you have in China now?

The prime minister said without hesitation: "Eighteen yuan and eight cents." "Eighteen yuan and eight cents?

Western journalists' eyes widened like lanterns. He said, "Go back and think about it, and you'll figure it out, you're not fools."

It turned out that at that time, there were no 100 yuan, 50 yuan, and 20 yuan in China, only 10 yuan, 5 yuan, 2 yuan, 1 yuan, 5 yuan, 2 yuan, 1 yuan, 5 cents, 2 cents, and 1 cent. Added up, exactly eighteen yuan octagonal eight cents.

Another British reporter saw that his accomplice was bored, so he stepped forward and asked: "You Chinese say that all reactionaries are paper tigers, how many soldiers do you have in China now?" "700 million people, 700 million soldiers. "*** I don't want to be authentic.

It was very unpleasant for an American journalist to see that the British and German reporters were gray. At this time, he saw an American-made Parker pen in his pocket, which was said to be the only gift from *** to ***, which was the tip of the pen. The American reporter thought that he could get a bargain now, so he pretended to go forward and ask *** to sign an autograph for him.

When the prime minister took out his pen and prepared to sign it, the reporter suddenly asked: "Prime minister, do you also use our American Parker?" In fact, the prime minister had already expected his conspiracy, and the prime minister said unhurriedly

This is the spoils of the Korean battlefield! The American journalist was embarrassed, his face was covered with water, and his face was as red as a carrot.

Shangshu is a dog" Shangshu and Shen and Ji Xiaolan (at that time, the official residence waiter) visited the garden at night, and suddenly a dog fled in panic, and He Shen asked Xiaolan in surprise: "Is it a wolf (waiter) or a dog?" Xiaolan replied: "The tail drooping is a wolf, and the upper vertical (Shangshu) is a dog." ”

One day, Andersen was walking down the street and a man said, "I don't give way to fools." Hans Christian Andersen said, "I am the opposite. ”

I am an ordinary student in my first year, and since I entered the school, I have participated in a number of activities, large and small, among which I have been impressed by the debate competition. I had never been exposed to debate tournaments before college, but the rich and varied university life gave me the opportunity to learn about debate, participate in debates, and then. Hate debates.

I found the topic of the debate to be unoriginal, and that was the main reason I didn't like it. Almost all the debate competitions I have participated in can find exactly the same theme on the Internet, so you can see the scene that once appeared repeating itself again, the same problem, the same-for-tat, the content of the other party reading according to the A4 paper can be found almost on the other side (A4 paper), not bad word, it makes me feel that the two sides are not debating, but more like reading, it is really super boring, is this still a debate? Are you sure you're not studying?

Am I seeing a fake debate? After a debate, there are very few wonderful parts, if it is compared to a movie, then the person who gives it praise must be the heart of a bodhisattva!

One China, the same one. The same topic greatly reduces the enthusiasm and innovation of students' debate to a certain extent, if everyone relies on the standard answers of the Internet, does not think independently, and does not increase their knowledge through reading, even if they win a temporary victory, it is just a short-term firework.

In all fairness, I think the debate needs to be innovative!!

The debate competition enriched the cultural life of the campus, broadened the students' horizons, improved their critical thinking ability and moral cultivation, exercised their oral expression skills, cultivated their adaptability, shaped their good personality and temperament, and showed the good spiritual outlook of the students of the Intensive Division.

It is our habit to understand every word and combination of words in the debate. The definition of each word is then given. How to be the current situation, what can be considered a hero, and what kind of achievement can be regarded as "made".

What does "make" mean, is it to make or create. Then understand the relevant debate topics, such as the two debate topics raised by the landlord, so that you can compare from all aspects, understand which aspects should be argued, and what arguments and arguments should be used to support your side. You will also learn how to refute your opponent's arguments.

The specific things still need to be understood while doing.

A debate is mostly about an hour, but the rules are not exactly the same, our rule is first, guess the opponent's theory for 1min, and the remaining 30s to remind, the positive side starts first. Then the opening argument is 2min30s, and the remaining 30s are reminded. Square first.

Then attack and defend one-on-one, choose the opponent's second defense or scattered defense. A total of 1min30s for both sides, and 30s for reminders. First the two arguments of the positive side, then the second argument of the opposing side, the three arguments of the positive side, and the third argument of the opposing side.

Then a summary of the argument, the time is 1min, and the remaining 10s are reminded, and the positive side is first. Then the free debate is 4 minutes for each side, alternating speeches, and the square starts first. The last four arguments are summarized and stated, 3min, and 30s are left to remind.

Counter first. As for the precautions, different tactics should be formulated according to the rules and the preferences of the judges, so the precautions are different, but you must maintain your demeanor, pay attention to politeness, and don't let the debate turn into a quarrel and scolding the street. Others, if you want to know, you can q me 254420191 a little bit of the humble opinion of debate lovers, don't laugh.

1 Check them all.

2 About 50 minutes Introduce the debaters of both sides, make arguments (each minute), question (4 minutes each), summary of the question (each minute), free debate (4 minutes each), summary statement (4 minutes each), (audience questions, judges) score.

3. Pay attention to the other person's problems.

q：974785269

I also participated in the debate, which is also included in the International University Debate Tournament. The time is roughly like this, I can't remember exactly.