Is relativism a dialectic? What is the relativist sophistry

Relativism. Of course, it belongs to dialectics.

The first few are off-topic. Whether a philosophy belongs to dialectics or not has nothing to do with subjective objectivity, these are two completely different ways of categorizing. The opposite of dialectics is metaphysics.

Metaphysics holds that things are immutable. Whereas, the law of dialectics holds that things are constantly changing and evolving. So relativism is dialectics And to clarify, relativism is not entirely subjective, in fact, objective relativism is more objective than any philosophy.

There is only one attribute of things - existence, and the so-called right and wrong, good, evil, beauty and ugliness are actually added by human subjectivity. Things have no value in themselves, value is artificially given. In this sense, relativism is actually more objective than any other.

He pointed out that value is inherently relative. Just like the motion of an object depends on the frame of reference.

Just like the coordinates of the point are only with the coordinate system you selected.

Relate. And in fact, does a point have coordinates? No.

If the coordinate system is thrown away, the coordinates will naturally disappear, and the so-called values (right and wrong, good and evil, beauty and ugliness) are actually the same. And those who preach that they are objective (including the one that is most spoken about in China) become subjective as soon as they come into contact with the question of value. Only relativism is radical objectivism!

In addition, a statement. I'm a relativist. Although relativism has been denounced by some scholars and politicians since ancient times, truth is truth after all.

Relativity: No, I think it refers to a certain material phenomenon, or a certain element of emphasis; The theory of relativity is one of the theories in dialectics.

The relationship between the two: interconnected, mutually containing. ②DialecticConversion:

That is, truth is a process of continuous development, and any understanding of truth is a link in the process of transforming from relative truth to absolute truth.

On the one hand, there is the absolute in the relative, and the absolute truth resides in the relative truth, and any relative truth contains particles of absolute truth;

On the other hand, there is a relative in the absolute, and the absolute truth is manifested through the relative truth, and the sum of countless relative truths constitutes the absolute truth.

1.There are two attributes of truth: absolute and relative.

2.The absoluteness of truth is the meaning of absolute truth:

As far as the objectivity of truth is concerned, any truth is a correct understanding of objective things and their laws, and it contains objective content that does not depend on human consciousness, which is unconditional and absolute; Nian Yun.

As far as the nature of human cognition is concerned, it is completely possible to correctly understand the infinitely developing material world, and the acquisition of every truth is a proximity to the infinitely developing material world, which is also unconditional and absolute;

In terms of the development of truth, the sum of countless relative truths constitutes absolute truth.

3.The relativity of truth is the meaning of relative truth: In terms of breadth, it is only a correct understanding of a certain scope and aspect of the objective world, which needs to be expanded; In terms of depth, it is only an approximate correct understanding of a certain degree and level of specific things, which needs to be deepened. In terms of process, it is only a correct understanding of a certain stage of development of things, which needs to be developed.

Relativism. Sophistry is fromDialectical materialismrelativism is a sophistry philosophical doctrine. Its main characteristic is the one-sided exaggeration of absolute motion while denying relative stillness, obliterating its definite prescriptiveness, canceling the boundaries between things, and thus fundamentally denying the objective existence of things.

in epistemology. Relativism exaggerates the relativity of people's cognition, completely separates the relative from the absolute, denies the absolute in the relative, and denies the objective standard of right and wrong.

Relativism is the epistemic basis of sophistry, which regards everything as relative, subjective, and arbitrary, abolishes the objective criterion of truth and falsehood, and opens the door to confusing right and wrong by reversing black and white, and becoming the most handy tool for sophistry.

Relativist sophistry research analysis:

But some relativists think this argument is too far-fetched. The above rebutter, take "violates the law of contradiction."

To refute "relativism" is actually a weak refutation. Because in the view of relativists, the "law of contradiction" itself is also relative. (Since everything is relative, the "law of contradiction" is, of course, also relative.)

In this regard, a careful person will find that the premise of the relativist's refutation is precisely that it acquiesces in the assumption that "relativism is absolute" (that everything is relative), thus leading mankind's common search for truth to the sophistry of self-contradictory circular arguments.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Relativism.

The absoluteness and relativity of truth are both two attributes of truth, and both of them have their important significance in the study of the essence of truth.

First, the absoluteness of truth means that certain truths are not subject to any situation or condition, and that they are universally applicable in any situation. For example, some theorems and axioms in mathematics are absolute, they are not affected by various factors such as time, space, and human cultural background, and are universally applicable.

Second, the relativity of truth means that certain truths can only be established under certain circumstances or conditions, and they are not universally applicable. For example, different cultures, histories, eras, and backgrounds have different understandings of issues such as morality and values, and this kind of truth is relatively leaky.

The dialectical relationship between the absolute and the relative of truth lies in the fact that the two are both different and related. In specific problems, absolutes and relativity are intertwined and indispensable. This is because if we completely deny the relativity of truth, we will ignore the influence of historical and cultural factors on truth, and in some cases, our understanding will become monotonous and rigid, unable to reflect the development and changes of history and society.

However, if the absoluteness of truth is completely denied, the objectivity, scientificity, and universality of truth cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, a dialectical relationship needs to be maintained between the absolute and the relative of truth.

In short, the principle of the dialectical relationship between the absolute and the relative nature of truth means that in the process of understanding the world, we should not only pay attention to the universality of truth, but also pay attention to perceptually analyzing it in specific situations, so as to achieve more scientific and rigorous results of understanding.

The principle of the dialectical relationship between truth, absoluteness, and relativity is the philosophical basis for upholding and developing Marxism.

Truth is people's correct understanding of objective things and their laws. Truth is the unity of the absolute and the relative.

The absoluteness of truth refers to the certainty and unconditionality of people's correct understanding of objective things and their laws, including the objectivity of the content of truth and the infinite development of truth.

The relativity of truth refers to the approximation and conditionality of people's understanding of objective things and their laws, including the similarity of the content of truth and the finite nature of concrete truth.

The absoluteness and relativity of truth are opposites.

Marx's doctrine, like any truth, is the unity of the absolute and the relative.

1. Marxism scientifically reveals the universal nature and laws of the world, which is its absoluteness. For example, the law of the unity of opposites, the law of mutual change of quality, and the law of negation of negation.

2. Marxism is also a product of certain historical conditions, and it should be constantly enriched and perfected along with the development of practice, and this is its relativity. For example, the theory of the revolutionary process of the proletariat developed from Marx and Engels' emphasis on "common victory" to Lenin's "first victory".

It is precisely because Marxism is the unity of absolute truth and relative truth that the scientific attitude toward Marxism should be a dialectical unity of upholding and developing.

The absoluteness of truth is the truth with absoluteness, which refers to the unconditional and infinite nature of the truth of the Senduan, and the relativity of truth is the truth with relativity, which refers to the conditional and finite nature of truth. The absoluteness and relativity of truth are two aspects and two characteristics of the same objective truth, and thus the two are dialectically unified.

1. Absolute truth and relative truth are interpenetrating, mutually containing, and mutually restrictive. On the one hand, there is the absolute in the relative, and the absolute resides in the relative; The relativity of truth also contains the particles of absoluteness. On the other hand, there is also a relative in the absolute, and the absolute truth cannot exist without such conditional relative truths.

The absoluteness of truth is expressed through relativity, and the sum of countless relative truths constitutes absolute truths. From the point of view of the duality of truth, any truth is both absolute and relative, the unity of the two.

2. Truth with relativity and truth with absoluteness are dialectically transformed. Truth is always in the process of transformation and development from relative to absolute, which is the law of the development of truth. Human understanding is a process of continuous deepening, a process of moving from relative truth to absolute truth, and approaching absolute truth, and any understanding of truth is a link in the process of transformation from relative truth to absolute truth.

People are constantly discovering the absolute in the relative and the relative in the absolute, so that the absolute nature of the truth is constantly expanding and deepening.

3. In a word, absolute truth and relative truth are both absolute and relative from a static point of view, that is, from the point of view of their mutual penetration; From a dynamic point of view, that is, from the point of view of the development of truth, any objective truth is a link in the transformation from relative truth to absolute truth, and it is also manifested as a process. Absolute truth and relative truth are not two truths, but two different properties of the same truth. On this issue, we must oppose absolutism and relativism, which separate the dialectical relationship between the two.

Relativism. Sophistry is a kind of specious reasoning and argumentation that is contrary to the laws of logic. When asserting a proposition or illustrating a problem in propaganda, the sophist does not reveal the inner connection of things truthfully and with the force of strong logic.

Instead, they proceed from the subjective point of view and create false connections and causal relationships with one-sided, superficial, and even irrelevant phenomena.

and the master-slave relationship to achieve the purpose of confusing right and wrong, reversing black and white, and creating a deceptive form of reasoning for its absurd remarks.

Sophistry sometimes argues its own propositions from a variety of factors, and proves its arguments extensively, but in fact it is pretending to be dialectics.

Destroying dialectics by distorting it. Sophistry sometimes acknowledges the permanent motion of things, while denying the relative stillness of things, denying the certainty of concepts; Sometimes the relative stillness of things negates the permanent change of things, and regards flexibility as a principle.

What is relativism

Relativism refers to a claim that there is no universally valid truth or value. Relativists believe that the judgment of truth and value is often different from the perspective and position of observation, and there are many differences between individuals or groups. The differences in views are mostly related to the historical and cultural backgrounds in which they are located.

The difference is related. Relativism deduces from the fact that truth and value are relative based on the difference in people's thinking and values, and the situation is the yardstick. According to this argument, truth and value are not universally valid in nature, and the same object may be true to A and may not be true to B. What is right in A may be wrong in B.

Because people's cognitive ability is limited, what they think and know is not complete, and there are many factors, such as emotions, habits, cultural conditions, economic and social conditions, class consciousness, etc., all of which affect people's cognitive role. As the intellectual society scholar Karl Mannheim argued, a social and historical truth can only be understood from that social and historical point of view.

Relativism and sophistry are two different philosophical perspectives that differ significantly. Relativism holds that the meaning and value of things are relative, and that different people, cultures, and historical backgrounds interpret them differently. In the view of relativism, we cannot reach absolute truth, and all cognition is influenced by subjective factors, so we must accept the differences between different points of view and respect pluralism and cultural differences.

Sophistry, on the other hand, is an extreme relativist view that holds that any kind of understanding is sophistry and false. The sophists believe that we cannot judge whether knowledge is correct or not, and that our knowledge is inevitably wrong, so the only conclusion is to abandon any judgment and reasoning. The difference between relativism and sophistry is that relativism acknowledges pluralism and difference, but does not deny the possibility of knowing, and it believes that we can achieve the exchange and dialogue of ideas from different angles and perspectives.

On the contrary, the sophists adopt a pessimistic attitude, and the idea that the belief that the knowledge is false and that the knowledge cannot be recognized is a contradictory and contradictory way of thinking.