-
Personally, I think it's a bit of a waste of A846, at least it should be K450.
Of course, there are not only head-wearers, but also many in-ear options. Wearing comfort with any headphones comes first, otherwise it's really a torture.
Try to choose a headset that is easy to push, so that it is easy to play the level of the front end, otherwise there will only be huge potential left, which cannot be tapped.
Style matching is a difficult point, only listen to it yourself and compare multiple products.
-
Absolutely. K420 is very cost-effective, listen to the popularity is good.
-
You have higher requirements for features and a larger budget.
Recommend iAudio's J3 at the thousand-yuan level,It's the highest quality at this level***,You want to have all the functions,There is also a beautiful design (won the International Design Award),And humanized UI。 And its ** style is biased towards the interpretation of the instrument, you will be satisfied.
The original headphones are at the level of a few dollars, in fact, the quality of J3 with 1000+ headphones is more than enough.
It is recommended to match a pair of AKG K420 first, which is the most cost-effective entry-level headset between 200-300.
If you feel that this combination is out of budget, you can also get a very good sound performance with the same iAudio C2 or i9 with AKG's K450 headphones.
In addition: iAudio products are equipped with BBE sound effects, which are very powerful, as long as you have enough patience, everyone can tune up their favorite sound.
-
Since I bought the A846, it is not bad for this money.
k450 bar.
-
Only K420,AKG This round does not have P。。。 Tease the round K420 is in the middle and low frequencies of the mountain, and the quality is worthy of **, but it is not clear how to match the mix.
-
I listen to the k420 on my phone, and it can be pushed completely, and it is more than enough.
The impedance of the K420 is 32 ohms, the sensitivity is 125dB, and its sensitivity value is very high in similar headphones, and the M6 can be perfectly pushed, rest assured.
-
I feel that the **** of Nokia mobile phone is still reasonable,K420Words go directly into a slightly high-end headphone,iAudio i9,Kubi Rubik's Cube C60,Sony NWS-S764 are all good,You can consider it。
-
K420The recognized highlight is that the balance and bass are more outstanding, such as Shen Laoguolz, I like to listen to rock or accompany Xiaoye Xing, then it is recommended to match the front end of Sony**In terms of bass, Sony has shouted that it has its own unique side, and there is still a big difference between listening to it with a computer and listening with *** Unless you have a very professional sound card, there is still no comparison.
-
First of all, the K420 is a cost-effective headset with a one-button cover change, and the bass is especially strong. As for the front-end equipment, the requirements are not high, after all, this headset is just a beginner product, and it is very easy to push, and it has a good effect on the computer, so there is no need to specially match a machine.
-
Feixin God, can only Tao old models have good sound quality, native support for all kinds of lossless, vocals and bass are slightly thin. Sig is also an artifact, the power consumption is slightly larger, and the dive is better. AKG is very modest, depending on your own preferred style, but BBE+ is really good.
Don't ask questions with your phone next time, 100 words are not clear.
-
I recommend that LZ choose Sony or Aiodi's machine, if you like bass, Sony (E453,S754,A844), if you like light pure sound, choose Aiodi (i9,J3,X7,C2).
-
I have used Aiodi J3, Sony S754. Samsung has only used the U5, so I won't mention it. Mainly talk about J3 and all aspects are good,High and low,The sound field is very good,The sense of hearing is more imposing。
The vocals are slightly worse and drier. S754The vocals are relatively forward,The bass elasticity is very good,High frequency is OK,The sound field is relatively small,I think this shortcoming is fatal,The sound can't be released,I feel aggrieved when I listen to anything。 If you don't care about the soundstage, the S754 is a good choice.
Both of these machines were out of me.,Now I'm using the innovative zen XF2.,This machine is also okay.,The vocals are moist,The sound field is open,High frequency is beautiful,Very transparent。 The downside is that the touchscreen isn't sensitive enough. The sound is indeed a bit muted, and the bass is not strong enough.
It's okay to listen to pop, and rock 'n' roll is more okay. If LZ doesn't mind the light sound, this is more recommended, basic and J3, A844 a quality, but it's not good to buy, only ****.
-
The sound quality depends on personal preference, and the feelings of listening to it are different depending on the preferences of a person and a person. Most people like powerful bass, though. I love the original**.
Each manufacturer's machine has its own characteristics, Samsung has a strong sense of space, and Sony has a strong bass. The apple is original. In general, Asian machine coloration is heavier.
But in pursuit of good sound quality, it is necessary to have a good headset that suits you.
-
If it's less than 1000, it's s754, if it's less, it's 453, and of course it's recommended to be 754
-
Samsung Q3, the sound quality is perfect after the balance is adjusted!
-
Sony suits your style, although Sony's price-performance ratio is a little lower than Samsung'......Let's go for 754
-
There's nothing wrong with that, the radio itself is CD quality, and if you're a stereo radio it's even cooler, and the sound is absolutely good.
That's mainly up to your planning, so that you can wiring It's not okay to imagine it out of thin air, calculate the capacity first, and then check the manual to see what wire diameter to use.
K3 is very good, and the comparison with the generation is as follows: >>>More
It depends on what car you compare with, to be precise, K3 is more homely, but with a bit of European flavor, the handling can still be handled, but the driving limit is not high, compared with the same brother Langdong, the suspension is a little harder, the road sense is clearer, this is still helpful for driving control, and the chassis is also more solid, high-speed stability is better than Langdong, but limited by the suspension of the travel is shorter, and the bad road is not enough to take the road This is the same as Langdong, secondly, because the Korean system has filled most of the cost of building the car on the configuration, so the workmanship materials will not be too good K3 The interior workmanship has a strong sense of plastic, but it is exquisite, and the silent performance is not too good This is compared with the same level Almost similar to Xinfu and Yinglang This level of benchmarking can not be compared with the interior workmanship is also so dynamic Biased towards Japanese style Start briskly Low rev power is excellent Slightly weak after high revs Power confidence is insufficient, so K3 driving texture at low turns and low speed is very similar to Honda Civic After high speed, power confidence is not as good as Civic chassis From the specifications of the torsion beam, naturally it cannot be compared with Xinfu of the same level benchmark The driving limit and fun are much lower, in summary, K3 is cost-effective Good configuration, home transportation is enough to cope with Of course, the chassis handling can also cope with the lack of workmanship, but the workmanship is not very advanced, the silence is average, the chassis handling limit is not high, the suspension stroke is short, and the shock filtration is slightly fragmented.
It is recommended to choose a motherboard with a 770 or 790 chipset. There are several reasons not to choose 780g: >>>More
Jin Yitao's bricks are OK, more beautiful, moderate, I like his antique bricks, if they are well matched, they will be very beautiful, do anything, if you do it with your heart, you will be able to do it well!