High score The best digital camera DC for color reproduction is recommended

**No more than 2000 want to have a good color restoration, it's a little difficult, hehe.

Even if it is accurate, it can only be relative, because even if it is a professional camera with tens of thousands of pieces, it has to be calibrated in the later stage.

At your price, I think it's more appropriate to buy Canon's Ixus 95 is 120 IS, the difference between the two is mainly in the wide angle, so choose according to what you want to shoot, one 1300, one 1900, the imaging is very good, I'm afraid there is no better at this price, 95 is the top of the sales list, 120 is the winner of the best camera in 2009.

Fujifilm F200EXR is the camera with the best imaging and color performance under 2000 yuan, and the 5x optical zoom is definitely enough.

In fact, the camera you want should not need a telephoto, only image quality and color, then choose Canon Panasonic Fujifilm.

Fujifilm F200 is OK, Canon's noise cancellation is a little better, you can buy IUXS200, but ** a bit super.

Panasonic's FX180, the CCD size is relatively large, and the imaging should be good

This shooting still life lighting is the most important

If you break it down, it will be different from one monitor to another.

It is recommended to buy a camera that you like

The lights are on point

Open**, mainly macro function, telephoto is suitable for travel,

Canon, the camera boss---!! The color is pure that is, the Sony brand is expensive, and the color is yellow.

The void of Fuji Shine, the black cloud.

Nikon Professional can. The card machine is not very good.

Olympus is still OK, but it's not as good as Canon, but it's good for money other Samsung, Panasonic, Casio...

There are also some domestic... It's not worth mentioning.

I'm a color expander, hehe, I know this.

The Sigma SD14 is the best color, but the lens can only be used with the Sigma one, and the body is more expensive. The second is that Fujifilm's machine is very well colored. Again, Canon and Nikon, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, are about the same.

The home DC is about the same, the lens is better, the imaging is better, the Panasonic, Fujifilm, and Sony are all good.

Fuji, but the other features are a little bit worse.

Ixus 80 is enough for general life, and those below 2500 don't expect to have the effect of 25000.

Recommend the price of 2450, 1470W pixels, and the shape is also very good, maybe you think it's a little expensive.

A2000is industry is good, about 1400, the disadvantage is the battery, you can only use AA batteries, the appearance is not very good-looking, it is said that it is about to be discontinued.

If you pursue cost-effective,You might as well take a look95,95 is the most cost-effective of all Canon machines,1700element,1000W pixels,Generally enough,You can consider it。

To be honest, with your requirements and **, I'm afraid it will be difficult to achieve unless the budget is increased!

Let's give you the best reference!

For more information, please see the July 2006 Hot DC Rankings! From the famous Pacific Computer Network.

How so? Sony doesn't specialize in making cameras after all, but it advertises well and looks beautiful. And other products of this brand are really good, but it is not recommended that you use this brand for cameras.

It is recommended that you use Canon or Nikon. This is a professional camera brand. As for the model, based on your requirements, you can choose Canon's Ixus 870, but this is not the latest, and the latest does not mean the best.

As for the value for money, it is also good. You can look up the parameters on the Internet, and I won't paste them here.

Brother,After reading a few of your requirements,The first thing I recommend is Canon A650IS,This is set from a practical and functional point of view,The current price is more than 2400,6X optical zoom + IS image stabilization + full manual + rotating LCD.There may be some features that your sister doesn't need yet, but this machine is enough for everyday use;

Another one is the A720IS, which has similar functions to the A650, but does not have a rotating LCD, and the sensor is also worse. It's just very cost-effective, very practical, and the current price is 1700

In addition to these two,It's still Sony H7,This is a telephoto DC,A friend of mine just bought one (but I haven't played yet.,Ask me vigorously,Hehe),The performance of this machine can't.,It's more practical,Of course,If you have more money,I'll recommend H9,It's only that it's over 2500,And Canon's S5 (although it's fallen below 3000,But it's still higher than your budget,So just mention it)Canon's ixus860 is also good, It's just that this belongs to the card machine, although it's not so thin, I don't know if it can pass the third article"Card machine do not need", and if it can be passed, it can also be considered. My personal recommendation is to give preference to the above three paragraphs: A650IS, A720IS, H7

Some**may be different, even in the same area** is not the same, this is best to go to the market to ask, inquire, in addition, don't be fooled by those clerks, look at the machine first, look at it and then buy.

Sony H2 uses a 1-inch 6-million-pixel CCD sensor, 9 groups of 11 elements, including an aspherical lens and an ED lens with 12x optical zoom Carl Zeiss VARIO-TSAR lens (36-432mm, plus a sensitivity of up to ISO 1000, which is basically an all-weather all-weather model. Sony's Clear Raw noise reduction technology can ensure the purity of the picture to the greatest extent.

Everyone knows that Canon has the best imaging and is the number one digital camera. What I recommend to you is Canon's A650, the price is just right, the cost performance is super high, Canon's A650 fully meets your requirements, in addition to the high-end Canon G9 is slightly stronger than it in the consumer-grade digital phase, A650 is the best! **Around 2400, with a full manual function, it can lay the foundation for future SLR, this camera imaging quality is better, because he uses 1 CCD, as well as IS image stabilization, 12 million pixels.

This camera is the best choice! Of course, the camera can also be used, up to 60 frames per second, which can also be used to meet your requirements! If the requirements are not too high, you can even save on buying DV in the future!

Now there are better cameras on the market with night photography functions, such as Sony's V series. I recommend the Sony V1 for your price. This machine has an infrared night camera function, and the manual function is also relatively rich.

But now the supply is very small, and it is Sony V3 that replaces him. The price range is 3800 4200. Of course, if you're not looking for an infrared night effect, a general camera with a wide aperture can do it, but with a solid tripod :)

Samsung N20, **2500 or so, 11 million pixels, very good cost performance. There is no need for extra introductions, and if you plan to buy it, it is recommended that you go to the Internet and come out.

Sony. I love Sony's.

Try it if you don't use it!

Recommend the Canon A650I'm using 630 now, I feel good cost performance, I bought it in February 07, and I have no problem using it now. In particular, the imaging quality is excellent, there have been several company organization activities, and when I came back, my 630 and my colleague's camera took a ** comparison, and I immediately saw the difference in effect.

They're all Fujisoni. The price point is the same as the 630. In particular, Fuji's night photography is particularly poor, and although the 630 has a lot of noise in the same lighting environment, it can at least be captured.

I can't see the figure of my colleague's Fuji side.

The 650 is an upgrade to the 620 630 640. From 7 million (A620), 8 million (A630), 10 million (A640) to the current 12 million pixels. The processing chip of the A630 is the second generation, and the current 650 has been upgraded to the third generation, which should be said to be in 1

With the support of the sensory area of a large CCD, the noise is definitely less than that of a 1-inch CCD, because this is beyond the control of any software, and it is a physical reason.

The 650 is a fully manual type camera, so there are shutter and aperture customizations. That's one of the main reasons why I started with the 630 in the first place, so that's what sets me apart from point-and-shoot. Of course, in most cases, automatic transmissions are used more.

But if you're interested in photography, the 650 is definitely the best of the way in the entry-level manual.

I want to say that I also want to support domestic products, but domestic products are like Adou who can't be supported. I can't help but chill everyone's heart. Of course, if you are very patriotic, you must buy Chinese goods, I suggest you don't buy "Patriot", my colleague is a garbage patriot that is bought for the same silver as foreign brand-name goods, the image is the same as a mobile phone, compared to my 630 like a plastic toy, hehe, my 630 is a machine gun, they are like pistols.

Finally, to sum up, don't buy a patriot when you buy a domestic product, and buy a Canon A650 if you buy a small Japanese product

More than 3,000 yuan, any one is very good, as long as you can pay for it.

P7000 and G12 than, buy the latter. Their volume and appearance are similar, but generally speaking, the performance of the machine is comprehensive, G12 is better than P7000, ** should be similar to the two, nearly 4000. Of course, compared to the S95 and LX5, they are less portable, but they are more manual.

S95 and LX5, whether it is ** or performance, S95 is lower than LX5, S95 is nearly 2900, LX5 is more than 3000, and the specific parameters can be found out by the landlord for comparison.

S95 is second only to G12 in CanonDC,If the landlord is just a daily household,Don't consider the DSLR,S95It's good,Picture quality,Performance is still very powerful,It's completely OK。 If the landlord has the intention of buying a SLR, G12, LX5 is the best recommendation for SLR standby, it depends on portability and funds. But whether it's G12 or LX5, they're just cards, and there's still a gap between the picture quality and the SLR.

Has the landlord ever thought about the mirrorless, the body of the card, the image quality of the SLR, now many manufacturers are doing, and the development prospects are very optimistic. **6000 or so.

I bought the S95 during the winter vacation, and at that time I was torn between it and the G12, considering portability, and chose it. But now I regret not buying a SLR, after all, this is a point of no return.

Hope this helps you.

All four of them meet your requirements for image quality.

The current ** (3500) of the G12 is a bit out of your budget, and too much manual kinetic energy may not be of much use to you.

Compared to the Canon S95 and the LX5, the wide angle of the S95 is 28mm, and the LX5 is 24mm, which gives the LX5 an advantage when shooting landscapes and can shoot larger scenes.

The indicators of Nikon P7000 are very close to G12, the difference is that G12 has a flip screen, and P7000's LCD screen cannot be reversed but is larger than G12. Plus, the P7000 isn't more expensive than you can afford.

In terms of weight, G12 and P7000 are about 350G, LX5-230G, S95-170G, and they are really not sinking.

To sum up, I think the P7000 and LX5 are for you. The P7000 is only available in black, while the LX5 is available in a variety of colors.

ps: Nikon's factory is a Japanese state-owned enterprise, from the beginning of the establishment of the factory to engage in professional routes, the development of microscopes, military optical equipment, aerospace equipment or something, marketing is really not very good, so the focus on marketing card machine sales is not surprising, in addition, there is upstairs said that Panasonic's card machine is not good, this is unreasonable, Panasonic's high-end machine is not doing well, the card machine has been very fashionable and very marketable.

Canon is the first choice, but I'm positioning you for the SX 220 HS for the following reasons: first of all, it's not big in size, and it's suitable for travel (the back DSLR is basically a slave to the camera Personal opinion).

The second is that she has a 14x optical zoom and a wide angle, which is pretty good in a small machine! It is very suitable for shooting scenery and people.

Again, the pixels and other configurations are not low, which is enough for amateur photography.

In addition, the first point is about brand selection--- Canon, Sony, and Olympus, I have them, Sony's post-buying, ** all belong to about 5000 at that time.

But Canon's is indeed better than Sony's, and Olympus is a film machine, so let's not say **, the Internet is less than 2000, and the counter is about 2400.

Panasonic and Nikon I do not recommend you to buy. Because they are doing a good job in high-end cameras, but they are not the best in terms of card machines, I still recommend you to buy Canon, the color reproduction is better, and the after-sales service is guaranteed. There are still relatively few people using the first two machines, and there are still fewer after-sales services in China.

Now the best Canon should be the exes series, you better take a look, ** around 2500, the most suitable for home!