Kidd vs Nash who has the most impact on the team

Nash's passing is more nuanced and Kidd's is also good.

Nash is very capable of scoring, layups, 3-pointers, and is very consistent, and Kidd can be a little worse, not much worse.

Rebounding Kidd is much better than Nash.

Also, Nash's defense is a big hole for the Suns, and Kidd defends well.

I see the effect on the team Nash = Kidd.

Kidd is more stable, while Nash has more turnovers;

Kidd defensive rebounds are better than Nash;

Nash is fast, passes fancy, and plays well;

Nash has a strong scoring ability and a high three-point shooting percentage.

The two of them are comparable.

A little more advantage on offense, a little more Kidd on defense, it depends on who is more powerful, if you fight a bull, it must be Kidd, but if you are 5 against 5, it depends on your teammates, after all, the game is five people.

As controls, Kidd and Nash are at least the best on the planet.

A good control position can lead a team forward and can control the game.

Both of them are the same individually, their contribution to the team and their role.

Both are the best point guards. Anyone who likes to watch the best 10 balls knows that watching their passes is a wonderful treat. Moreover, they also gave the team chemistry, the Nets played the Finals, and the Suns became the strongest team in the West with the strongest offense.

But judging from the last 2 years, Nash will surpass Kidd. I believe.

Kidd Kola, of course.

Kidd became famous as a teenager.

As soon as he debuted, he was crowned as a magician.

Of course, people are not wrong in their conjectures.

He brought a new style to the league.

He has reached the finals twice.

And Nash didn't.

It is also better in terms of control of the game.

So it's better to say Kidd.

The two of them are undoubtedly the best point guards in the league. But Kidd is old, and many times he can't compare to Nash!

Nash has been progressing and kidd is starting to regress.

Nash and Kidd have their own merits.

Steve Nash was born on February 7, 1974 in Johannesburg, South Africa. Canadian professional basketball player, playing point guard for the Los Angeles Lakers in the NBA.

Steve Nash was drafted by the Suns with the 15th pick in the first round of the 1996 NBA Draft, joined the Mavericks in 1998, returned to the Suns in 2004, won the regular season MVP for two consecutive years, and signed with the Lakers in 2012. He was selected into the 8-time All-Star team, the 3-time All-Star First Team, and won the championship of the 2-time All-Star Skills Competition, and is one of the representative figures of the 96** generation of American professional basketball.

Steve Nash is the ninth player in MLB history to win back-to-back MVP titles among guards, and the first international player to win a regular-season MVP since Olajuwon.

On March 22, 2015, Nash announced his retirement, ending his 19-year career.

Jason Frederick Kidd (born March 23, 1973 in San Francisco, CA) is a former American professional basketball player who plays point guard. He is currently the head coach of the Milwaukee Bucks.

Jason Kidd was drafted by the Dallas Mavericks in the first round No. 2 in 1994, NBA Rookie of the Year in 1995, NBA championship with the Dallas Mavericks in 2011, and retired with the Brooklyn Nets on June 4, 2013.

Jason Kidd has the second-all-time NBA assists total, the second-highest steals all-time, and the third-most triple-doubles all-time. The player era has gone through four teams, including the Mavericks, Suns, Nets, and Knicks. After retiring, he directly served as the head coach of the Brooklyn Nets, creating the history of the fastest changing role of a head coach in NBA history.

Parker has a storied career as a point guard, as well as numerous accolades, including 4 championships, 1 FMVP, 6 All-Star and more. But when people talk about the league's best point guards, Parker is always the one left in the corner, why is that? Let's talk about it today.

Nash passes the ball better. Kidd has a better ability to control. This year I won an overall championship. The status has risen again.

I prefer Kidd. The reason is that after watching several games, it was found that Kidd was able to lead the players in the game. There's a more important reason that my own style of play is like Kidd's.

To be clear, my personal opinion is that Nash is the kind of person who can spot his teammates in a great position and pass the ball out of a flash; Kidd is the kind of guy who can spot a good passing position and then give a teammate an opportunity to realize that there's such a good position and run over it.

The two are about the same, Nash is good at blocking weird passes after pick-and-rolls, and Kidd is good at long-range passing, as well as moving the ball in large areas.

In general, each has its own strengths.

But I personally think Kidd is a bit more comprehensive.

And Kidd was lucky, he was old enough to win the crown.

Nash was unlucky, but I should all respect this great leader who didn't have a championship.

I like Nash more because it's exciting to watch him play, and to see his amazing assists and three-pointers in key moments.

Kidd was slightly inferior and lost in his scoring ability.

I feel that the scoring ability Nash is much better, smart breakthroughs, all kinds of magic strokes outside the three-point line, Kidd's shooting is not for a while, but now Kidd is also accurate, there are two brushes outside the three-point line.

Defensively, Kidd is better than Nash doesn't know how to do it. Nash himself said that his defense was too bad, so what else was there to say.

As for passing, I feel like Nash is just going to get the ball where it needs to go, unpretentiously but very useful. Kidd passes well fancy ==

As for the locker room. Nash is more of a playmate friend. And Kidd has the demeanor of a big brother, so domineering!

I don't know if you've played 2k, but if you do, you shouldn't have any doubts.

When playing 2k, they basically retire in the same year every time, you can see it when you look at the career data.

Nash is averaging just one more point per game in scoring.

Kidd assists the active No. 1 all-time second. Triple double, active first, third in history. Steals are the first in active duty and second in history.

Offense, Nash scored one more point and had fewer assists.

The hit rate is so bad that it's so bad. But after all, the average score per game is not much. A 14 a 13

The defense is basically incomparable, 4 times the best defensive team...

Ji does not attack. Accept not to keep. Again, the defense wins the championship and the offense wins the audience. Nash is more popular than Kidd. But Kidd is now ringing again.

Data Kidd wins.

Kidd has 5 times, 4 times, 1 defense, 1 championship.

Nash 2mvp 3 times for a while.

The honor seems to be Kidd.

Personally prefer Nash! The action is elegant, chic!

Kidd, the Dream Team point guard, you name it.

Each has its own strengths, isn't LZ already seeing it quite clearly?

The rest is a matter of personal preference, and I prefer Nash.

Personally, I think that Nash's comprehensive ability is stronger and his historical status is higher. Nash is known as the Magic, not only can score on his own, but the most important thing is to be able to drive his teammates, which is the performance that a superstar should have, but looking at the current Harden, it is difficult to drive his teammates when he can't. So a player like Nash would be more valuable.

Nash, who is more capable and has a relatively high historical status, is a point guard, and is now the head coach of the Nets, with a total of two regular season MVP titles in his career, then 8 All-Star selections, 5 assists titles, and two Skill Challenge titles.

Kidd and Nash are both very well-known point guards in the NBA. At his peak, I think Nash would have been stronger. He has also achieved better.

When you think of traditional point guards, who comes to mind? Paul, Stockton, or Nash? If the team were to pick a cornerstone, would they want to sign Nash or get Kidd?

This is obviously a very tangled question, after all, these two players are very good, and the palms and backs of their hands are full of meat. Next, let's analyze the difference between Nash and Kidd, so that it is easier to judge.

Jason Kidd was drafted by the Mavericks that year, and in his first season, Kidd showed amazing talent, and he also won the Rookie of the Year award at that time. In his second season, Kidd showed an amazing threat and averaged per game, and with such a performance, he also made it to the All-Star starter, which shows his status in the league at that time.

And in the 10 11 season, he also won the championship with the Mavericks. And Kidd's best thing is not his assist ability, his playmaking ability, although he holds 5 assist titles, but he has to mention his defensive strength. He was named to the All-Defensive First Team four times and the All-Defensive Team Second Team five times, which is clearly a defensive height that Nash can't reach.

We're done talking about Kidd, and then let's talk about Nash. Nash wasn't a high pick, and he was only ranked 15th due to physical gifts. And his performance in the first four seasons was very average, averaging less than 8 points per game and less than 4 assists in the four seasons, so in the first four seasons, we don't see any talent in Nash at that time.

And in the fifth season, Nash began to burst into a different form, he averaged per game, and in that year he was successfully selected as an All-Star, and since then, Nash has begun his glorious journey, and he has also won 5 assists and two MVPs, which is obviously very dazzling.

So if we had to pick a cornerstone of the team, would we prefer Nash or Kidd? In fact, in the eyes of more people, Nash should be the player who will be more chosen, because Nash is good at bombardment tactics, which is quite similar to the current small-ball era of play, which means that Nash will integrate into the current system team and league atmosphere faster and better.

And Nash also got two MVPs, what does that mean? This shows that he has a lot of strength, and he used to be the darling of the league. Even if Nash didn't win the championship, that didn't affect his greatness.

Of course, Nash's fluttering style may never be seen again in our lives, but his fluttering movements on the court will always stay in the minds of fans.

In terms of being able to help his teammates become better, it's clear that Nash, who has unlimited potential and makes all five Constitution All-Star players, is a better fit than Kidd to be the cornerstone of the team.

It's all about the same, their historical status is also about the same, although they are not the same in terms of dispatch, but their personal abilities are not much different, they are all selfless, and they are all suitable for being the cornerstone of the team.

Nash. Nash has the all-time best passing vision and passing ability, and he's a good fit to be the engine of a team.

As the most dazzling passing masters in the NBA in the new century, Nash and Kidd have brought a memorable visual impact to fans, and their own unique characteristics have also earned the two the nicknames of "Na Bu Keeping" and "Ji Bu Off", which can be said to be one of the most favorite stars of the fans. And Nashkid's outstanding passing talent and similar skills make people want to divide the best of them, so let's compare the three aspects to find out who is the best passing master.

The first is to compare with the most intuitive statistic that proves the passing ability - assists. Nash's career total assists are 10,335, which ranks third all, and his average assists per game is the ninth all-time. Kidd's total assists reached the second-highest all-time record of 12,091, and the average assists per game ranked eighth.

In terms of assists, Kidd is slightly better. In terms of the honor of the assist king, Nashkid also has 5 times, but at the peak of the Suns, Nash can produce an average of 11 assists per game, while Kidd, the peak of the Nets, can only produce one assist. From this, we can conclude that Nash's passing ability is better than that of Kidd at his peak, but Kidd's long-term stability is stronger than Nash's.

The second is the ratio of assists and turnovers between the two. Nash's career average of one assist per game was accompanied by turnovers, which made Nash's assist-to-turnover ratio even second, which is also extremely rare in history. Kidd's assist-to-turnover ratio is somewhat unexpected, and behind his assists is a turnover, and his assist-to-turnover ratio is as high as high.

Thirdly, we will compare the data of the two hands. Nashkid has played 34 career games, with Kidd winning 19 and Nash 15. And the statistics of the two sides are also very similar, Nash can average 16 points and assists per game, and the shooting percentage directly reaches the level of 180 clubs.

Kidd averaged points, rebounds and assists per game on a shooting percentage. Although Kidd is ahead of Nash in assists, Nash has played a full three minutes less than Kidd, so it is not difficult to see that their passing ability is actually comparable in the course of the two encounters, but Kidd's all-round ability has allowed him to win more duels.

Overall, as a veteran of the point guard position, Kidd is slightly better than Nash in terms of passing ability, but either way, both men are arguably some of the best passing masters of the 21st century. Now that Nash has retired, while Kidd continues to fight on the court as a coach, both of them can be said to have brought indispensable excitement to the youth of many fans, and I wish them a good place to go in the years to come.