HR tells you why the interview went well but didn t ask you

That's going through the motions, and it's already settled.

Summary. Hello! It's just that the interviewer is testing you, and if you fail to do something, what kind of mindset do you have.

Your question has been received, it takes a little time to type, please wait a while, please don't end the pretend to be consulted, you can also provide more effective information, so that I can better answer for you. <>

Hello! It's just a blind interview and an empty official is testing you, if you lose your hands in doing things, what kind of mentality do you have to deal with. I suggest you do it like this:

If I fail this interview, it proves that I still have a lot to learn, and I will study hard, correct my problems carefully, and strive to succeed in the next interview.

What I replied at the time was which statements and which points did not meet the requirements? Still is? I'm not very clear

Thank you very much for your trust, I hope the service satisfies you, recommend my consultation card to you, change your hands like orange eyes, you have other questions, or relatives and friends who are suspicious of each other have consultation needs, welcome to ask questions, thank you very much...

Is it going to be cold?

Confusion in the workplace like this is very common, and I can empathize with the ideas you said, and many people in the workplace have consulted me with similar questions. You can consult me again, I can be a career planner to solve these problems in the workplace for you for a long time, and provide you with customized guidance from all aspects of dealing with people, so that you can be more comfortable in the workplace

HR said that other people are still interviewing, please wait patiently, you are not sure if there is a chance to ask, generally HR is also comparing, if there are more interviews, it is natural to screen and then decide the final candidate, if you wait for 2 days and there is no movement, then you can go to the next company for an interview.

Basically, there is no hope.

Generally speaking, after the final interview, the person who is confirmed to be admitted will send an offer directly. In relatively few cases, it is possible that some students will be selected as "pending", that is, substitutes. However, the possibility of a substitute turning into a regular is very small.

1. Not necessarily, it depends on the other people who are with you to take the test. There will be a trade-off between the interviewing unit and they will feel that you may not be wrong. However, I also want to see if others are better.

Maybe you're a very good candidate for it, or maybe you're one of the alternatives. Don't wait for news in a hurry.

2. If it is an ordinary position or a large number of people in demand for the same position, it is generally said that it is likely that there is no hope for going back and waiting for news. However, if it is a more important position or management post, and in the case of a large number of competitors for the same position, it is often necessary for a higher level of leadership to make a decision or retest, and it will also be allowed to go back and wait for news, of course, this situation will not wait too long, because they are also afraid of talent loss, and most of them will give a notice of whether to advance to the next round of interviews or trial positions the next day.

Generally limited to 3 days, if the interview is suitable, I will contact you again within 3 days, and if there is no news after 3 days, you can call ** to the company to ask, and ask them to give you the interview results or send an interview feedback. The longer there is no news, the smaller the chance of passing the interview or being hired, and you can look at opportunities from other companies with peace of mind.

After the interview, what should I do when I go back and wait for the mold limb to know the time to travel to the world?

You're not the only one who fits the bill. It is possible that they meet people who are very demanding of each other, and everything else is dispensable. The judgment of this situation depends mainly on what kind of job you are interviewing for.

It can be analyzed from the following factors: if the skill requirements of this job interview have been very standardized, very mature and clear. This kind of position is usually handed over to the HR department for more interviews and screening, because his assessment requirements and conditions have been standardized and clear, which is convenient for HR interviews.

If you are interviewing for a job with a strong business specificity and professional background, you need a competent leader to ask more questions. In this case, if the supervisor does not have any questions during the interview, it is HR who is asking some simple questions, which are neither too hot nor too cold, then there may be no chance. If the HR manager takes a fancy to your situation, but the business manager doesn't catch the cold, it is estimated that the HR manager will ask a lot of questions.

If HR "doesn't even give you the opportunity to interview", how do you find out that HR "sees that the candidate has no experience"? If the company's requirement for "experience" is a hard indicator, it will not notify you of the face-to-face judgment at all, and there is no need to worry. In fact, corresponding to the long list of requirements for the advertised position, each candidate will have advantages and disadvantages.

The recruiter will compare whether your strengths can be exploited by the company, whether your weaknesses can be compensated for or irrelevant, and the same goes for experience.

Many years ago, I wrote an article about the same problem: when the school recruitment received more than 5,000 resumes, there were only 2 people in HR, and the leader randomly divided more than 5,000 resumes into 2 copies, and one of them was thrown away. The focus school is selected from the remaining one.

Even if you qualify, you still need 50% luck, don't you? I don't want you, but it's not all your fault. HR plays a very bitter role in recruitment, so don't be too them.

Do what you have to do. I believe that good companies still need to be short of talents. "It's hard to recruit talents, and we've been recruiting"!

You should be that person, not a normal person who will complain.

I didn't give my brother the opportunity to open the interview, maybe because the academic background is not well written, the work experience does not meet the expectations of HR, the academic background may not meet the requirements of the job, there is no outstanding professional performance, or there are better people in the orange dust cavity.

The reason generally given is that the position is not particularly consistent with you, or because your ability is not enough to be qualified for this position, or for some other reasons, the gap may also be because there are other candidates who are more suitable for the position, or because of the salary problem.

The resume has blind problems, does not meet the needs of the company, etc. There is a problem with the resume, and the quality of the information on the resume does not match the company's position; It doesn't meet the needs of the company, and your high work experience does not meet the needs of the company.

It may be that my resume is not very novel, or it may be that my ability does not quite match the job requirements of their company, which is his direct approach to my resume.

I think it's possible that your resume didn't pass the primary selection level, so HR didn't send you an interview. After submitting your resume, the interviewer will screen your resume first to see if your resume meets their company's employment requirements, and if your resume is not outstanding, they will screen your resume in the first roundIn the second round, these screened resumes will be interviewed for them.

So it's hard for a lot of people to get past the first hurdle of their resumes. So you should design your resume more beautifully, typesetting more beautiful, now there are many apps have such a resume template, you can enter your own information into it, and then use this template. It can make a better impression of this resume at first glance.

In addition to the appearance and layout of the resume, the content of the resume should be done well to make it richer. Be sure to write all your work experience in this resume, they will focus on it, look at the work experience column, you have to write down all your achievements in the previous company. But remember not to fake, because those interviewers are very good, and they can tell at a glance who is cheating on their resume.

If the resume fraud is found out, it will not only be very embarrassing, but you may also lose your job. So at the beginning, you have to write what you have, don't go to fake, say that you have worked in some larger companies, and they can verify this.

In the work experience column, it is best to write about your project achievements, or how many people are in this project, and what kind of role do you play in this combination of how many people? This is because many interviewers pay special attention to working with others. Because many company projects require communication and cooperation with people, if this person has good communication skills and cooperation skills, he is better than working in this company.

So it's very important to make sure you have a rich resume.

It means that you are not good enough, the other party has a better choice, or you do not meet the requirements of this position, so this result will occur.

Because my strength is not very good, and it is also because I am not particularly well prepared and lack some expression skills. It's also because I'm very much out of line with their company. There are also problems with resumes.