Table tennis performance comparison between Stiga oc and Yasaka YE

I think this is a good question: OC and YE are both classic 5-wood arc ring boards, which are difficult to distinguish...Purely from the perspective of the arc circle, OC has a slight advantage (of course, YE is not weak) From the throughput ball, arc, landing point, and double jump speed OC's arc performance is slightly more prominent than YE, after all, the arc machine is not in vain....However, near-station treatment YE is significantly better than OC....OC's near the platform is meat.,The feel is empty.,Leverage is also shocking.,The drop point is not easy to control.,This point of Ye's small ball is more delicate.,Although pushing is also a weakness.,But Ye's big core is thicker and much more comfortable to push....There is not much difference in the strength of the big force (I personally think Ye is better) The biggest disadvantage of OC is that it is thin, and it is not as deep as Ye when it hits the ball with a straight backhand and a backhand....There are more OC versions on the market (blue label, plus nano)....So this is not easy to compare.,Personally, I think the new version of ye is also doing well....OC This board can be said to have charming strengths and unbearable shortcomings....Based on the performance of all parties, I am still more biased, and Ye is purely a personal opinion.

It's hard to say who is stronger, after all, there is an essential difference between the two boards, and to put it simply, you should not have seen two professional athletes playing against each other with YE's horizontal board and OC's straight board.

OC is characterized by its abundant base strength and excellent deformation, resulting in a near-perfect arc. This kind of violent aesthetics advocated by the board requires you to be gifted with divine power, and the more powerful the bottom plate becomes, the more powerful and weird the curved ball becomes.

Ye focuses on excellent control and good foundation, and also has good deformation, but it is not as good as OC. The characteristics of the straight board are manifested in the control of the ball, and Ye's excellent feel is vividly demonstrated in the forehand backpull arc and backhand cross.

Which is stronger and which is weak can only be seen by the benevolent.

We hope you are satisfied.

The straight board of YE is good, and the horizontal board of OC is good. Comparatively speaking, OC is more cost-effective. OC-CR-WRB is recommended for transverse plates

YE is relatively easy to make arcs, but the force requirements are relatively high.

OC elasticity is good, known as the arc ring machine, and the borrowing force is not good, generally it is rubbed a lot, and then pulled.

It depends on your playing style, and newcomers recommend ye

The red and black carbon king is good.

The carbon wood structure of the red and black carbon king, maintaining the feel of pure wood, and at the same time using the carbon film to increase the hardness and elasticity, the combination of pulling and playing is good, the ball is fast, the rotation is strong, and the advantages of OC and CL are integrated, and at the same time there is no obvious difference between the two boards, such a board, for some people, it is not easy to use, but for me, it is just right, I think the red and black carbon king is the most suitable for my way of playing, the combination of pulling and playing is high, that is, it requires rotation, and it requires speed, and it must have the bottom strength, what board is better? Besides, ** is still cheap, speaking of which, it is a set of words: what suits you is the best, not the best, not the most expensive, only the most suitable.

Specifically, the red and black carbon king plays ball, and the sound is more brittle than CL, naturally because of the addition of carbon film, and at the same time, there is a trace of vibration transmitted to the hand, which may be related to the thin red and black carbon king, and the shot is cool and transparent; The second speed of pulling the ball is good, the first speed can also be used, the arc is easy to control, basically you want to pull low and pull high can be controlled freely; Rubbing, swinging, skimming this kind of technology is very good to control and force, the ball has speed, it is very good to play fast attack, eat the ball and take off the board quickly, the ball is slightly sinking, the more force, the more the ball has a sinking feeling, the middle platform can be pulled and played, and there is a lot of room for choice. After the ball hits the racket, the racket has an obvious feeling of backbending and rebounding, which is more obvious than that of CL, which does not feel the bending; It doesn't have such a long feeling of eating balls than OC.

Overall feeling: Pulling and playing have a straight feeling, and there is elasticity, with a small deformation to achieve a deeper ball eating requirements. No wonder one of my coaches said that the red and black carbon king is better than the OC, and I know the real weakness of the OC only after using the red and black carbon king, and I deeply agree with this.

After writing this article, I suddenly felt that it was not like an evaluation of the red and black carbon king, but more like a comprehensive comparative analysis of the three boards. In the future, I will not burn the shooting again, with the red and black carbon king as the main shot, and OC and CL as the secondary board.

Yasaka ye

Speed: 7+ Control: 8+

Weight: 82 Thickness: Layers: 5

Yeo layers: 5

Speed: 9 + Control: 8

Weight: 86 Thickness: OC Layers: 5

Speed: 73 Control: 63

Weight: 82 Thickness:

Red & Black Carbon King Blue Crystal CL-OS Marlin Carbon I'm the accountant of the professional team I've had the opportunity to try the boards.

OC is already OK, the ball is better controlled, the low strength is enough, the red and black carbon king is a very violent card racket, very hard, if you are an arc strong attack type on it, Yasa Kamarin This racket is absolutely good, straight,.

YE: Arc circle fast attack type.

The feeling of holding the ball on the board and the feeling of popping up for a moment is easy to experience, at least my Yasaka ye bottom board does not shake my hands, and it will not cause the ball to feel unclear. In the serve, table rubbing, pendulum and other heavy techniques, it can also create a relatively low ball, and the spin is also good! It is relatively easy to swing short, and it is easy to use it freely if you have a certain skill to pick and play, and the arc of the COSCO billiards pull ball is good, and it is easy to turn the ball.

yeo: fast-break arc type.

5 wood arc circle ball, eat the ball is very good. The line is very thief, to the COSCO platform, and the horse carbon ratio, the bottom strength is slightly worse, but the holding is very good, will not feel bad control, it is indeed a good baseboard! OC: arc ring type.

5. Wood strong arc type, relying on its own force, soft elastic board, for those who do not standard action with caution. Pure wood is the most classic, not for anything else because it is more suitable for more people, its advantages are particularly prominent, and the disadvantages are also very prominent, many people know what the bottom plate is:

oc，oc-cr-wrb

Or OC-CR, etc., CR is to strengthen the hardness, WRB is a hollow handle, which increases the transmission of feel, but I personally think that it is more suitable to shoot CR directly on OC, and then WRB is more comfortable, and the transverse plate is OC and OC-CR are more suitable. EG: A representative paddle of the new type of middle and near Taiwan arc circle play.

The characteristics of Goki EG are a little harder than OC.,Not so bounc.,Just the feeling of being good.,But his strength is not small.,But it's fast to get started.,Easy to attack.,The characteristics of high hitting rate.,Can make the opponent busy returning the ball.,The angle control is quite good.,The feeling of pointing to where to hit will increase your power.,And EG's rotation is very strong.,So the comprehensive power is very great.。 If you really want a lot of power, then it is not that you can solve the problem you want to solve without finding a piece of EG of more than 90 grams, and the effect of 92-93 grams will be better. Red and Black Carbon King:

The fast attack arc circle type is 7 + 6 layers, wood + carbon is 5 + 4 layers, the difference between wood + carbon CR and WRB refers to the description of OC The bottom of the board is strong, the ball is fast, the attack and defense advantages of the middle and far platform are obvious, the board is slightly hard, the rubber is not well matched, the ball is out of bounds, and it needs to be adapted. But the ball is very fast, and the opponent is not easy to defend against the bursting arc.

Using a sponge to paddle not only has strong friction but also good elasticity, which is helpful for pushing and holding horizontally.

It depends on what kind of board you like, and generally choose the one that is more flexible and easy to master.

DEF is suitable for traditional defensive play that focuses on slicing the ball from a distance.

all- It is suitable for the all-round play style of the near table, focusing on ball control (rubbing, pushing) and chipping defense.

All is suitable for an all-round style of play that is both offensive and defensive.

all+ is suitable for an all-round style of play that focuses on attacking the ball, and can create a topspin circle ball with a large rhythm.

off- It is suitable for mid-court attacking play, with strong spin, high hitting accuracy, and better ball control.

OFF is suitable for the attacking style of play of the serve, the hitting speed is fast, the spin is strong, and the hitting power is high.

OFF+ is suitable for the most aggressive attacking style of play, with fast hitting speed and attacking the ball.

YEO is a black walnut surface, which is harder than the lymphatic surface of OC, and the thickness of YEO is millimeters, which is thicker than OC's, so the deformation of YEO is a little smaller, and the push gear is better than OC, and the speed is faster. The deformation of the OC is very large, the ball is held for a longer time, and the first speed is very slow, but the second jump has a noticeable sense of pricking. The two have different styles of playing, Yeo is suitable for the first three boards, and OC is suitable for holding each other; YEO is suitable for fast arc of straight plate, and OC is suitable for both sides of the arc of transverse plate.

The fast attack is mainly used for cl-cr, and the push block is more stable than ye, although the horizontal play is not as good as ye, but it is not bad.

Both are good boards! But CL and YE are two rackets with very different styles!

The CL board body is strong, suitable for fast attack play, fast speed, solid retreat, but the arc circle is slightly weaker.

Ye is famous for its soft board, with a soft feel, a steady arc, and a high rate of horizontal hitting, but the push and push blocks are relatively soft.

The two baseboards depend on whether your playing style is based on fast attack or arc circle, fast attack more, choose CL, arc circle and horizontal play more, choose ye.

The forehand of the rubber is generally used as a mad three, 39 degrees, 40 degrees can be, and the backhand feels good with Leo's HK1997.

Hope these suggestions help you!

This style of play is best played with STIGA CL, Yasaka Ye's push is not very good, as long as you learn to take the initiative to exert force, you will find the advantages of the STIGA series.

CL la, set of rubber forehand save 40 degrees backhand sriver el

I'm similar to you, I bought Yasaka's yeo, it feels good, the butterflies used for the leather are all foreign, and it's okay to match, you can consider it.

Not necessarily, depending on individual needs.

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth;

There is no universal racket and rubber, only the one that suits your own style of play is the best. In addition, with the continuation of time and the improvement of technology, coupled with the update and improvement of equipment, enthusiasts may wish to make appropriate adjustments or try on the racket.

What kind of base plate and rubber to choose depends on personal style, only in the actual combat slowly experience, through their own fine-tuning to adapt to the racket or according to their own style to choose the combination of the racket is a wise choice. In addition, amateurs have a misunderstanding, once the state (feel) is not good or there is little progress, they start to doubt the equipment, and always want to change the equipment to solve it, but they don't know that the real reason is likely to be that the basic skills are not solid, or the depth of understanding the function and potential of the racket. Equipment is important, but to understand the rules of table tennis, master and skillfully use the basic technology, enjoy the fun of sports is more important, their racket to cherish, protect the edge of the paste, after the play to do a good job of rubber cleaning, to minimize the bump of the racket,

shizhe123321 makes it very clear that there is no best, only the most suitable. I would recommend that amateurs who are not at a high level do not use carbon board and fiberboard, which are more sensitive, elastic, and have a fast rebound speed when hitting the ball, which is not easy to control and affects the feel. It is better to use a pure wooden bottom plate, practice the ball steadily, slowly cultivate the feel, and correct the wrong movements.

The more easy-to-use pure wood bottom boards are Yasaka-ye, Yeo, and Ye3D; Stiga-OC, EL, EG, AE, Nano OC, etc., as well as Kerber for butterflies. These ** are ranging from 200 to more than 300, which is not very expensive, with a general hurricane, backhand EL or FX, CJ8000, adding up to less than 500RMB, and it is also much easier to use than carbon fiber boards. I hope you can change your mindset.

I am currently using Nano Carbon King, and I feel that the performance is very comprehensive, there is no obvious shortcoming, and the biggest disadvantage is that the portion is relatively heavy.

This is completely the concept of cheating money, in fact, many classic shoots are very good and cheap, remember, technology is king, shooting is just auxiliary, of course, foreign shots are definitely much better than domestic ones.

Agree with what the fifth floor said. I use a black crystal, and the swing speed is faster than that of the nano carbon king! But it's just that it's biased towards dark crystal, and each has its own merits.

Stika black crystal is easier to use: the nano carbon king is heavy and thick, and a piece will fall off under the surface - it doesn't matter if it doesn't hurt money; Although the black crystal is not violent, it is easy to play and easy to play, and the continuity is very strong, and the parallel goods are around 310.

Speed: 94 Control: 75

Number of layers: 5 Weight: 87 grams for horizontal plates, 83 grams for straight plates.

It depends on your situation (style of play, power, etc.).

Ruicot R6, cypress + aromatic carbon. This bottom plate is not easy to say, there are very few people who use it, cypress is a relatively hard material, plus aromatic carbon, this feel must be greatly discounted, and Ruicott is not famous in the domestic table tennis brand, and the reputation is average. The best quality base plate is still Sweden's stiga, and pure wood base plates are cheaper.

The quality of the butterflies is also good, but it is not cost-effective, and most of the bottom plates are more expensive. If you want to practice, or use pure wood is better, the pure wood bottom plate body is softer, eat the ball steadily, feel good, can be a good correction of wrong actions, carbon bottom plate body hard, although the speed is improved, but the great sacrifice of the feel, just start to practice, or the technical level is not high, it is best not to choose the carbon bottom plate. The better pure wood bottom plates include STIGA-OC, EG, AE, CL, YASAKA-YE, YEO, YE3D, Butterfly-Kerber, Kong Linghui pure wood, etc.

Hope it helps.