I m sorry, please don t talk to me about marriage if you don t buy a house in full , what do you th

Actually, I don't think that's right. Although it is said that after getting married, you can buy a house, but you can't stop getting married because of the house. Nowadays, many girls get married for the house, and if the man does not buy the house in full, she will not talk to him about marriage.

There's really no need for that. A house is not the foundation of marital happiness, and it does not mean that there is a house to have a home. The house is only material.

Now there are many people who get married and divorce in flashes, and many of these aspects are also related to the house. After getting married, many women feel that a man is not able to buy a house, so she looks down on him very much, and she thinks that this kind of man can't give her happiness and wants to divorce. I don't think the contradiction is in the house at all.

It's this woman who doesn't really love that man, or wants to live a good life. Since she didn't have this kind of thought, how could she live well with that man.

Getting married is a very important thing. In fact, there is no problem without a house, now that housing prices are so expensive, not every man can afford to buy a house, so those men who can't afford to buy a house are called singles for the rest of their lives? Do you think you can find a man who can actually afford a house?

Even if they find it, they probably won't look down on you. I hope that girls who have this kind of thinking can think about it and exclude the factor of house from marriage, so that your marriage will be much happier.

I think this kind of thing is a willingness to fight and a willingness to suffer, anyway, she said this kind of thing, so do you think you can meet her condition, you will continue to be with her, if you can't meet it, you will break up with her, what else can you do? <>

Everybody thinks differently, and I don't think I'm going to judge her for being wrong. Maybe she is also "poor and afraid".

Emotional problems are really not good to judge who is absolutely right, who is absolutely wrong, even if she puts her feelings on the material basis, we can understand her behavior, who stipulates that women must pay off the mortgage with you, endure hardships together, start a business together, and make money together.

This kind of thing is not all about one person making a condition, and the other party then going to meet her condition. <>

If you feel that you are reluctant, you can't give up her, but you can't meet her conditions, this is very aggrieved. Even she likes you just as much, but that doesn't mean she has to be you, someone will always show up, just to meet her conditions. Even if there is no one to meet her conditions in the future, it will be in the future.

And now it's up to you to bow your head for love first, or not to each other.

First of all, my point of view is that such a girl is very unreasonable, a very arrogant and materialistic girl, but looking at her categorical reply, it can be seen that she is a very goal-oriented and assertive girl, if a girl like her is married, it is not suitable, but if you work, it is very suitable for the kind of representative work that talks about the project, and will never give in to the other party, you must have an advantage, all in all, this girl's statement is in my current situation, I don't agree. <>

Secondly, I think it's already very good for a boy in his twenties to be able to support himself, and if you want him to buy a house in full, it's almost the life of the boy's family, everyone is a general family, and now the house price is so expensive, and many people want to buy a house where they work, and the house price is half more expensive, so if you love this man, you should consider each other and not be too tough.

Finally, if the boy has no money after buying a house in full, although the girl does not have the pressure of a loan, but the future marriage and children are a large amount of expenses, these are all things to consider, a foreseeable girl must have taken into account the future, so she will not force the other party to buy a house in full, but choose the advantages of the other party to be suitable for yourself before falling in love with a man.

Women are very realistic in the face of marriage, no woman is willing to suffer with a man, and they break up if they can't see the hope of the future.

Now that a married man must have a house and a car, many men's parents have to take out half of their life savings to buy a house for their son and marry a wife.

I don't think there's anything wrong with a woman's request, since you don't have the strength to buy a house in full, why should a woman waste time falling in love with you? Everyone's thoughts are different, and we don't have the right to blame some women for being very realistic.

The newly married couple has a mortgage, and after having children, the cost is greater, and hard work cannot reduce the pressure of life.

The woman who asks the man to buy a house in full can be said to be a person with high material requirements, and her parents' requirements for the future son-in-law are also that they must buy the house in full, and what kind of parents have what kind of children.

Since the requirements are not met and you can't fall in love, then it's better not to talk about it, the world is so big, you must meet a woman who is willing to pay off the mortgage with a man.

To be honest, ordinary families can buy a house in full, and more or less need the support of their parents who have exhausted half of their life savings. Real estate is also the first issue that many ordinary families consider when they get married.

As a woman who has entered the appropriate age for marriage and childbirth, I saw this topic, and looked back and thought about my own mate selection criteria.

Although society is material, isn't it more important to value character in marriage? Sometimes we don't say too decisively, because we are marrying this person and living with this person for the rest of our lives, not marrying a house, a car, or even more his money.

Those who can buy a house in full without relying on their parents are only a very few examples among most ordinary people. And these few people also encounter suitable opportunities among most ordinary people, plus their talents earn good rewards, and such people will look at women who say such things.

Presumably, the woman who can say such things is not very good herself, so she will be so demanding of the man. To be honest, I think the house, the car, and the ticket are all things that can be fought for together, and they are not necessary to decide that we are together.

I don't know how to express it, I can't approve of such an approach, but after all, it's someone else's business, and I don't have anything to comment on. I can only say that everyone chooses differently when facing many things, as long as the choice at the moment is worthy of yourself, that is.

Loving someone should be a very pure thing, but now more and more people are adding all kinds of chips to their feelings. These chips include a house, a car, a job, an annual salary, and a lot of savings. Sure enough, the love of a teenager is more pure, and at that time, liking someone was just because he wore a white shirt you liked and had a warm smile.

Obviously, among the many terms, the house is the most important clause, as if there is no full payment of the house is not the sincerity of marriage. However, marriage is very sacred, should not be measured by these material things, whether two people can become a family, the important thing is to look at fate, to see whether there is the courage to join hands for a long time, not a cold cement shell.

To put it bluntly, if you don't have a house, you can create a family business together in the future. What's the use of having a full-money house if you don't have feelings?

I'm still a romantic person about marriage. I don't approve of this kind of person who doesn't want to talk to me about marriage if he doesn't have a house, or such an idea, and I won't turn myself into such a person.

Some people say that marriage is a grave, but I think marriage is run by two people. When we choose a person as a marriage partner, it may be his appearance, her beauty, and his handsomeness; It could also be his status, status, money, economy, etc.; And these people in the title pay more attention to the economy of the other half.

I think marriage is a lifelong thing, after all, you have to hold hands with that person for decades. Grow old together and spend the rest of your life. Money, status, beauty, etc. may change over time, or they may lose everything overnight.

You can also marry someone with a good name. Then you work together to get a better future. Although the garage, material conditions can be a prerequisite for marriage.

But it must not be a necessary condition. Character, self-motivation, filial piety, etc., are all very important factors.

Some people get married because of love, some people get married because of their children, some people get married because they are old, and some people get married for money, status, fame and fortune. Hopefully, everyone can marry love.

The lack of story setting is not good, and it is easy to generalize. I'll make a bold guess. If you can talk about marriage, it won't be the first time you meet, and you've been talking about it for a while.

From a rhetorical point of view, two consecutive denials of "not in full" and "don't" should have been talked about and demanded before, but now the tone of the speaker is relatively cold, indicating that the previous talks have collapsed. If the negotiation collapses, in the absence of the possibility of marriage, the girl will normally choose to break up, and the boy will delay. And there is a word please in the middle, which is more like a girl's tone.

Bride price, dowry, whether to buy a house or not, whether to accompany the car, who is responsible for the decoration, whose name is written on the house and car, this is all discussed by both parties, and they do what they can. There is no need for moral kidnapping, if you can't agree, don't be together, two families with different views will not be happy if they are twisted together. For men, don't go to the famine, don't marry a woman you can't afford to marry, why marry her.

For women, if you have to be wronged to marry a man, don't marry, just like this before marriage, even more aggrieved after marriage, as long as there is a little reluctance in the heart can not marry, in terms of feelings, women's intuition is more accurate than rational thinking and self-comfort.

This sentence weeds out 90% of the boys, and if you think you are better than 90% of the girls, you can make such a request