Is there a big difference between 8400GS and 9200GS?

The core of the 8400GS is the G8X series, the core of the 9200GS is the G9X series, and the G9X is the next generation of the G8X. The 9200 uses a new core, and the 3DMark score is higher than the pen 8400, and the 9200 is a little better, using a new chip, and the video memory is also large. There will be some gaps, all of which are low-end graphics cards, so the gaps are not very big.

9200gs is not much stronger than 8400gs.

Although the 9200 series is relatively new. But he belongs to the entry-level mobile chip. In terms of performance, it is average.

Common discrete graphics cards:

Modified ATI X1600== FireGL v5200 (graphics performance) is 35 (see below for details).

The NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT is 19 (D10 supported).

The AMD Mobility Radeon HD 2600 counts as 17 (D10 supported).

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700 counts as 13

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS is considered (D10 supported).

The ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 counts as 12

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 counts as 10

The ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 counts as 10

NVIDIA GeForce GO 6600 counts.

The NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT is considered (D10 supported).

ATI Mobility Radeon X700 counts.

The AMD Mobility Radeon HD 2400 counts as 8 (D10 supported).

NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS is 8 (D10 supported).

NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G counts as well (D10 support).

ATI Mobility Radeon X1450 counts.

The NVIDIA GeForce GO 7400 counts as 6

The ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 counts as 6

AMD Mobility Radeon HD 2300 counts.

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 counts.

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 counts as 5

The ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 counts as 5

The NVIDIA GeForce GO 7200 counts as 3

NVIDIA GeForce GO 6200 counts.

Common Integrated Graphics:

ATI x1150 counts as 3

Intel GMA X3100 counts.

NVIDIA GeForce GO 6150 counts.

ATI Radeon XPRESS 200m counts.

Intel GMA950 counts as 1

Garbage

It's not as good as the 7300GT

Buy the 8600GT OK 499 should put.

There is not much difference, they are all discrete graphics cards, and this difference is too small to be measured with professional equipment.

GS is 64bit video memory, GT is 128bit video memory, and the performance of GS is almost 25% lower than GT performance

Divide what you use it for.

If it's just home entertainment, games and the like, you basically don't feel it, and you can only test it out with software.

You can see it in the scores, but you can't feel it when you use it.

The speed and frequency of the video memory are different.

DDR General3

DDR2 or so.

DDR3 is the fastest in microseconds.

So the frequency that can be reached by the video memory is also the same: the lowest DDR and the highest DDR3.

All belong to the low-end, not much worse.

The GT240 performs a lot better at 8400GS and is one of the weakest graphics cards to support DX10.

Technology Power Consumption One is 80 nm and the other is 40 nm Which one is better?

GT240 and 9800GT performance is comparable, and 8400GS performance and 8600GT have more than 2 times the performance gap, 8600GT, the performance is half of the 9600GT performance, 9600GT and 9800GT have about one-fifth of the performance gap, therefore, GT240 performance is about five times that of 8400GS, which is better and which is inferior at a glance.

The 8400 is a low-end graphics card. The 8600 is a mid-range graphics card. The 8800 is a high-end graphics card. The 8400 is about 30%-40% weaker than the 8600.

The gap between 84 and 86 is not very big! The difference can be about 10-20% performance difference! You can play 84 if you can play basic 86!

I now use 86 512M 4 to drive QQ car! Double open wow! Inefficiency allows for a Cryo crisis!

Default effect runs Call of Duty 4! In a word, in the end! 86 can play, 84 can play!

84 can't play 86 is no play!