How to understand and recognize the unity of subjective and objective concrete history.

First of all, the unity of understanding and practice, subjectivity and objectivity, should be concrete and historical. The so-called concreteness means that subjective understanding should be consistent with objective practice at a certain time, place, and conditions.

Second, the unity of understanding and practice, subjectivity and objectivity, should be historical. The so-called historical, that is, subjective understanding, should be compatible with the objective practice of a particular stage of historical development.

Third, objective practice is concrete and historical, so subjective understanding should also be concrete and historical. When the specific process of things has moved forward and changed to another concrete process, the subjective understanding should be changed accordingly, and if the subjective understanding still stays at the original stage, this is detached from the concrete and historical characteristics of objective practice, and the thinking lags behind reality, and it is easy to make conservative mistakes. When the concrete process of things has not yet ended, the original contradictions have not yet been fully exposed, and the conditions for the transition to another concrete process are not yet in place, if people insist on reluctantly carrying out what they may do in the future to the present in an attempt to transcend the stage, this is also divorced from the concrete and historical characteristics of objective practice, and they are prone to make the mistake of making rash advances.

Therefore, "our conclusion is the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, theory and practice, knowledge and action, and the concrete history, and opposes all erroneous ideas that are 'left' or right that are divorced from concrete history."

The process of dialectical movement of cognition is a process of seeking the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, cognition and practice of concrete history. The unity of understanding and practice is concrete, which means that understanding should be consistent with objectivity and practice at a certain time, place, and conditions. Practice is concrete, and the theories produced in practice are bound to be concrete.

The unity of understanding and practice is historical, which means that practice is always developing, and understanding should be consistent with practice that is constantly developing and changing. The concrete historical unity of understanding and practice requires that when the concrete process of practice has moved forward, theory should be changed accordingly, otherwise we will make the mistake of thinking lagging behind reality. When the concrete process of practice has not yet been completed and the conditions for the transition to another concrete process are not yet in place, people will make the mistake of adventurism if they insist on forcibly postponing things that can only be done in the future and trying to go beyond the historical stage.

The unity of the subjective and the objective, the concrete unity of history.

Oh, such an article is fine!

1. What is the concreteness and historicity of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity1The concreteness of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity. The concreteness of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity means that the conformity of subjectivity to objectivity is realistic, not arbitrary and false.

This unification is subject to specific conditions such as time and place. The reality of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity requires that people should not replace objective reality with their own imagination, but should truly realize this unity and analyze in detail the historical conditions for realizing this unity. Lenin made it clear:

We do not deny the general principles, but we require a special analysis of the specific conditions for the application of these general conditions. There is no abstract truth, truth is always concrete. "The unity of subjectivity and objectivity means that subjectivity should be consistent with objective reality, that is, proceeding from reality and seeking truth from facts.

2.The historicity of the unity of the subjective and the objective. The historicity of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity means that the unity of the two is changing and developing, rather than immutable.

This unity changes with the movement of the objective material world, and is the unity in the development of the unity in the change, not static and rigid. Lenin once pointed out that the unity of thought and object is a process, and that thought should not think of truth as a rigid stillness, as untendencing, motionless, and bleak as spirits, numbers, or abstract thoughts.

The unity of subjective and objective concrete history refers to the dialectical unity between subjective thoughts and objective things in the process of people's cognition.

It is the basic point of view of dialectical materialist epistemology.

Dialectical materialism holds that objectivity determines subjectivity, subjectivity depends on objectivity, and people's subjective thoughts are the reflection of objective things.

The dialectical movement of human cognition is the dialectical unity of subjectivity and objectivity on the basis of practice.

The task of people's understanding is to seek a concrete historical unity between subjectivity and objectivity.

This unity should be concrete, that is, subjective understanding should be consistent with objective practice at a certain time, condition, and place.

This unity should be historical, that is, subjective understanding should be adapted to the changing objective practice.

The unity of concrete history requires that when the concrete process of objective practice has moved forward, subjective understanding should be changed accordingly.

If the subjective understanding remains at the original stage, we will make the mistake of right-wing conservatism.