I had very little education, I didn t graduate from junior high school, but I managed a factory with

Eloquence is related to genius, but the key should be your own experience and knowledge, especially your knowledge. So you should read more newspapers, listen more to the radio, read more books, and make more prepared speeches. After a long time, it will naturally get better.

I think it's better to read books than to learn by yourself, and that's socializing. Make some friends who are better at speaking. Communicate with them more often.

Learn how they speak. See how they communicate with others. I'm making some good friends.

Start by reaching out to your friends. Or as long as you are connected, you can read more Chinese textbooks for junior high school and high school, and remember that you are reading rather than reading. After all, with more sentences and vocabulary, you can speak more smoothly.

I would like to introduce you to a good ** for learning and charging: Luoyang Success Network.

Among them, there are wonderful lectures on success motivation, business management, marketing, communication eloquence, etc. Chen Anzhi, Lin Weixian, Yu Shiwei, Li Jian, Liu Minxing, Li Qiang, Zeng Shiqiang, Zhang Jingui and other famous teachers give lectures, so that you can listen to the voices of masters without leaving home, and help you achieve a happy workplace life and successful dreams.

I have ** in my profile, please come in and take a look.

It is advisable to subscribe to the magazine "Speech and Eloquence" and to watch and listen to TV broadcasts.

Be full of self-confidence, read more books to enrich yourself, and often practice speaking, expand your social skills, and contact more eloquent friends. Good luck!

Practice itself is the best teacher. Study more, think more, exercise more, and after a long time, you will naturally produce results. Good luck with your studies!

Management has nothing to do with the degree, the most important thing is to be a role model and have the courage to do so. Napoleon didn't read for a few years.

It's easy to say, find an assistant, help yourself more, and study hard.

Now the society is very realistic, and it is important to have confidence in yourself!

I don't think it's the problem with the books, because it's not that you don't have it in your heart, but you can't talk about it. My suggestion is that when you want to express something, you should write a draft in your mind in advance and rehearse it as if you were memorizing lines (in your heart, of course).The second step is to say it, you can talk to yourself when no one is around, or you can find someone to practice, of course, you have to be trustworthy, you won't feel faceless, let him help you correct how to say better, **inappropriate.

Then when you speak in front of everyone, you can speak slowly, express the problem clearly, once you are born, you are familiar with it twice, and the second time is good, and it will get better and better in the future.

Throughout the ages, many folk celebrities have not had the opportunity to learn knowledge, but why are they so smart? It's just that they know what works for them and how to use the abilities they have now!

Regarding knowledge, Wang Jingwei is a talented person with rich knowledge! But he is a national scum who is not to be deducted!

Whether knowledge is useful or not depends on whose hands it is!

Owner! My answer is too simple, not to disdain your question, but to say that this question doesn't need to be so strenuous to ask! I hope it's over soon! To put it bluntly, everyone is here for your 100 points!

--Zhou Shuren respectfully.

No matter how strong an employee's ability is, if he is not willing to pay, he will not be able to create value for the enterprise; And an employee who is willing to devote himself to the enterprise, even if his ability is slightly inferior, he can create the greatest value for the enterprise through hard work. There is no bad work, only irresponsible people!

The ability to work is like a submachine gun, and the sense of responsibility determines whether the submachine gun will fire at the enemy or at its own people.

Therefore, if you are a manager, people who have the ability and a sense of responsibility can use it boldly, those who have a sense of responsibility and no ability to look at it, and those who have the ability and no sense of responsibility should not use it. For a person with a strong sense of responsibility but poor ability, if he is an ordinary grassroots employee, the big head may be mainly a direct supervisor, or a few colleagues in the upstream and downstream. You ask him to buy a pack of 70g A4 printer paper, and he comes back sweating profusely, and comes back empty-handed to tell you that it's sold out, even though the stationery store still has a lot of 80g prints.

If he is a manager and his abilities do not match his responsibilities, it can affect the efficiency and morale of the entire team he manages. Either his subordinates have to popularize a lot of basic concepts with him when they report to him, or he doesn't dare to feel that he has to report to a higher level of leadership when he should have decided matters. Therefore, people with a strong sense of responsibility but not strong ability must be looked at.

There are several aspects to the meaning of looking, the first is to arrange the work that matches his ability; The second is to watch the work process, don't expect to arrange a job and wait for a good result beyond your expectations; The third meaning is to train him more, a responsible person is rare, and patiently improve his ability to be reused. For irresponsible people, it can be said that the stronger the ability, the stronger the destructive power, the small will be wrong, and the big one will bring heavy losses to the company. If possible, try to clean up as much as possible, no need to hesitate.

Because you live in the real world!

Ability and knowledge are not a pair of contradictions, it should be the relationship between ability and knowledge. A person's ability to show that he has knowledge sufficient to solve the problem. A person has knowledge, even a deep knowledge of a certain aspect, but you may not be able to use it in your lifetime, and it only shows that you are proficient in what you have done.

In this way, you are also capable, you have special abilities, that is, you are valuable on special occasions.

However, in the real world, a large number of things do not need to be so complicated, and if you can solve them, it means that you are capable. If you can make something big and deep, it means that you are worthy of your academic qualifications and knowledge. However, we don't know how many times in our lives we have the opportunity to do something big, do we?

So don't worry too much about the relationship between ability and knowledge, and make a move when it's time to make a move!

Because learning knowledge is about being capable. After all, life depends on ability rather than knowledge, in fact, knowledge and ability do not need to be talked about separately, knowledge is ability, I think so.

Knowledge is good, but ability is more valuable.

Knowledge is an iron rice bowl But iron rusts.

Ability is a golden job bowl, and gold will always shine.

After all, people rely on ability to do things, and knowledge is only a necessary condition for ability, not a sufficient condition.

Because competence includes knowledge, and knowledge does not necessarily include competence.

A person with knowledge alone is equivalent to a teapot filled with dumplings, you are rich in content, who knows? I can't do things, I can't be a big responsibility, I have a fart.

I don't think you need to go on long to get your bounty, right? There is no absolute answer to this! It's a matter of opinion!

But the ability to feel is the embodiment of knowing! And knowledge is the foundation of ability! The two complement each other, but one cannot be the other!

As long as it feels like ability is more important! Right? Top dog?

There is a problem with the topic, and having knowledge is a kind of ability in itself.

First of all, where knowledge comes from, learning comes from, and learning itself is an ability.

In the person, knowledge needs the ability to want him to express, without ability, knowledge can only be empty talk. Lu You has a poem: On paper, you will eventually feel shallow, and you need to do it when you know it.

Knowledge is indeed the foundation, just like the foundation, and ability is like a house. Is the foundation or the house important?

Three, as mentioned in the third floor, knowledge is not a sufficient condition for ability, but ability is a sufficient condition for knowledge. Classification description a = knowledge, b = ability. Because ability necessarily leads to knowledge, so b = ability + knowledge. Hence b>a. Therefore, ability is more important than knowledge.

For knowledge is dead, but power is alive

If a person has good and solid knowledge, but has no social practice at all, then theory and practice cannot be linked. Therefore, we still have to pay attention to cultivating our own practical ability

Knowledge and ability are like a scale, if the knowledge side is heavy, and the ability is stilted up like a seesaw, then you will fail!

There is a problem with the problem itself.

I think the questioner understands it this way: ability is the real ability that can be actually operated, and knowledge is an empty theory on paper.

Because the questioner has such a pre-requisite, and the pre-question itself is not right. Isn't it clear when you say that? What knowledge do you need, or what kind of knowledge, can't you use it, can't guide practice, can't help, do you dare to use it?

In fact, real knowledge itself is a kind of ability, which is superior to practice and a theoretical summary of practice, so it is higher than practice. He is not in harmony with, nor should he contradict ability, and knowledge that contradicts ability is still called knowledge?

It is not true to say that ability is more important than knowledge.

The application of basic knowledge, combination, the process or the accumulation of knowledge or experience, human ability does not exist in a vacuum, it is a high-level manifestation of knowledge, high ability refers to the set of knowledge application rules that are not limited to the existing basic knowledge (itself is also a kind of knowledge, and low ability may be no basic knowledge, or, no accumulation, learn the knowledge of knowledge application rules.

Marx said that philosophers always interpret the world in different ways, and the problem is to transform the world.

Knowledge is only people's understanding of the world, while ability refers to the ability to transform the world with concrete hands.

We understand the purpose of the world, and we also want to transform it.

People improve their quality of life by transforming the world so that they can better survive themselves.

Therefore, ability is more important than knowledge.

Ability – the ability to discover knowledge, to create knowledge, to discover and create knowledge at a higher level than existing knowledge.

Knowledge - Ability to exert ability and improve ability, but not to discover and create a higher level of knowledge.

One sentence is clearest ——— knowledge is created by ability, and without ability there is no knowledge (the relationship between father and son).

Let's talk about some of the application problems (column equations) that are in line with the mathematical equations of the first year of junior high school, which is also very meaningful!!

Recursive relationships.

1.Five monkeys.

The child takes the apples from a pile of apples in turn. The first monkey divided the apples into five heaps and one more genus, and it took one heap after another; The second monkey divided the rest of the apples into five equal piles and one more, and it took one heap after another; In the future, every monkey took the apple like this. Q: How many apples are there at least?

How many apples are left at the end?

2.What is the maximum number of parts that 5 straight lines on a plane divide into a plane? How many parts does n straight lines divide into a plane at most?

3.What is the maximum number of parts that 5 circles on a plane divide into a plane? How many parts does n circles divide a plane into at most?

4.What is the maximum number of parts that 5 straight lines and a circle divide into a plane?

5.4 people practice basketball, pass and catch the ball to each other, ask each person to pass the ball to others immediately after receiving the ball, start to serve by A, and as the first pass, after the fifth pass, the ball is back in A's hand, ask how many ways to pass?

6.5 people do basketball training, pass and catch the ball to each other, ask each person to pass the ball to others immediately after receiving the ball, start to serve by A, and as the first pass, after the 4th pass, the ball is back in A's hand, ask how many ways to pass the ball?

Hua Luogeng's story.

When Hua Luogeng was in junior high school, his homework was not good for a while, and sometimes he failed the math exam. Hua Luogeng's mathematics teacher, a famous educator and translator in China, Wang Wei (born in 1900, a native of Jintan), found that although Hua Luogeng was playful, he was quick to think, and his math problems were often changed and changed, and the solution method was very unique. Once, when the teacher of Jintan Middle School lamented that there were many "poor students" in the school and there were no "talents", Wang Wei said:

Not necessarily, in my opinion, Hua Luogeng is one! "Hua Luogeng? One of the teachers laughed

Look at his two crab-like words, can he be considered a 'talent'? Wang Wei said with some excitement: "Of course, he has little hope of becoming a great calligrapher, but how can you tell his talent in mathematics from his handwriting?"

You must know that when gold is buried in the sand, it looks no different from the sand, and we need to have the ability to pan for gold in the sand with the eyes of a teacher, otherwise we will bury talents! ”