In the modern world, can two countries merge into one country if they agree to each other?

If the two countries agreed to each other, they could not be merged together, because the interests of the whole world were at stake.

If two countries agree to each other, it can be merged into one country, but this can only be carried out with the consent of the people of the two countries, otherwise the consent is invalid.

Generally speaking, even if two countries agree, they cannot be merged into one country, and the merger of two countries will lead to economic and military integration, which is particularly dangerous for other countries.

In this case, the two countries could theoretically be merged. But the merger process will be met with all sorts of resistance from other countries that will not sit idly by and watch their rivals become stronger.

From the point of view of international law, of course it is allowed.

As long as the interests of other countries, especially the interests of major powers, are not involved, and one country voluntarily merges into another, the international community will certainly allow it.

If Nauru affects the interests of other countries, especially the major powers, the international community will not allow it. You must know that the world today is a situation of one superpower and many powers, that is, the United States is the only superpower, and China, Russia, the European Union, Japan, India and other world powers are close behind. How can it be allowed if one country voluntarily joins another, affecting the interests of these world powers?

Not to mention that even a country or a region is difficult to allow.

In 2014, Crimea held a referendum, and 96% of people were willing to agree to join Russia. Even so, Russia has been subjected to economic sanctions from the United States and the European Union. If it weren't for Russia, but other countries, I'm afraid the United States would have used force.

Moreover, there are many so-called voluntary members of other countries.

Conclusion; In essence, international politics is still the law of the jungle! Our priority is to develop, develop, and develop again, so that we can stand at the top!

Permission is subject to availability. If the inhabitants of these two countries agree and support, then there is no reason why the international community should not allow it, but if one of them is coerced, it will certainly not be accepted.

It should not be allowed, because the merger of the two countries will be stronger than the original, which will pose a threat to other countries.

Militarily speaking, the merger will definitely improve its strength, and it will definitely be a threat to other countries, so naturally it will not agree... But for the national football team, it is still good, at least the ranking has gone up.

I think it would be good if both sides agreed, and if Japan wanted to join China and everyone agreed, they only needed to learn the Chinese language, implement Chinese laws and policies, pay money and pay taxes, and do they need the United States to sign and seal?

If Pakistan enters into a merger, it will be beneficial to both China and Pakistan in the merger.

Without 100% consent of the people, there will be Western countries that will not approve of the Crimea vote...

Not necessarily, in the case of Germany and Austria, after the First and Second World Wars, Germany and Austria were not allowed to merge.

I think it's acceptable, because as long as the two countries recognize each other, it's fine.

The United States, Canada and Australia are most likely to merge and become a unified English-speaking nation.

Mexico would love to have the Stars and Stripes, but the Americans don't want it.

The law stipulates that Austria and Germany prohibit why bother.

Do you think it is possible for the two Koreas to merge voluntarily?

Of course not, the merger of two countries will mean the birth of a new and stronger state, which will involve the interests of many parties and will be opposed by other countries concerned.

Sovereign states have the right to decide their own destiny in theory, for example, when two sovereign states merge, the two countries must be willing to do so, and in theory they can become one state.

But in practice, the merger of two countries would mean the birth of a new and stronger state, which would inevitably have an impact on other countries, so it is not something that the countries concerned can merge if they want to.

For example, Germany and Austria cannot be merged. Germany and Austria belong to both Germanic peoples, and both countries speak German. When Prussia unified Germany, due to Austria's strong strength, Prussian Chancellor Bismarck adopted the "Little Germany Plan" and temporarily sent Austria outside the unified Germany, completing the first real unification in the history of the German nation.

However, although it did not join Germany, after all, it was the same language and the same species, and the relationship between Austria and Germany was still good. Austria and Hungary later united to form the dual Austro-Hungarian Empire, and joined Germany's Entente alliance to participate in World War I.

After the end of World War I, the Austro-Hungarian Empire was dissolved and Austria became independent. After Austria's independence, Britain and France, in order to prevent Austria from merging with Germany, specifically requested in the Treaty of Versailles that Austria should not be allowed to join Germany.

However, after World War I, due to changes in the international situation, especially the establishment of the Soviet Union, Britain and France gradually loosened their grip on Germany. By 1938, under the manipulation of the Nazis, Austria held a referendum to join Germany. Only the Soviet Union objected to this, while the rest of the Western countries sat idly by.

Austria is located in the heart of Europe, as the center of the Holy Roman Empire, the Austrian Empire, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Austria has a very good industrial base, and the occupation of Austria has greatly increased the strength of Nazi Germany.

After World War II, Austria was occupied by Britain, France, the United States, and the Soviet Union, with the Soviet Union having the largest occupation zone. Under the terms of the Yalta Agreement, the United States and Britain agreed to include Eastern Europe as a sphere of influence of the Soviet Union, but Britain and the United States refused to give up Austria. The Soviet Union agreed to withdraw its troops from Austria, but only if Austria was called a neutral country.

After Stalin's death, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev reached a compromise with the West, and the Soviet Union signed the "State Treaty for the Reconstruction of Independent and Democratic Austria" with Britain, France, the United States and Austria, stipulating that Austria was a neutral country and could not join Western military organizations such as NATO, and could never merge with Germany.

Therefore, according to the State Treaty for the Reconstruction of an Independent and Democratic Austria, Germany and Austria today cannot be merged into one country, even if both countries agree to the union.

It is possible for two States to merge into one State if they agree to each other, as this does not violate the provisions of international law.

I think so. In this way, many countries can share resources, which is also conducive to the flow of population, and the exchange of various economic, scientific and technological resources, etc., will promote social development to a certain extent.

Generally speaking, yes, because the United Nations has such regulations.

Yes The two countries of East Germany and West Germany were merged into the German Republic, and the merger into one country was to have a strong enough force to deal with foreign enemies.

Throughout the history of the world, there must have been, and generally merging to defend against foreign enemies, so the two countries were forced to unite.

There are many countries that are the result of the merger of two countries, but only some small countries will be like this, and this is not the case for really large countries.

I don't think there is, how can I be willing to merge, if I merge those two kings, who will be the king, fight to the death.

Yes, the German Democratic Republic (and the Federal Republic of Germany were merged on October 3, 1990, and there were some in ancient China.

During World War II, the German Republic was formed by the merger of East Germany and West Germany, which is a very typical representative.

I think there are a lot of them, not only are there two countries in one country, but there is also a country in two countries.

Both countries have their own monarchs, and it is impossible to merge naturally, only by force, to unify six countries and unify seven countries.

Of course not. It has to be submitted to the United Nations for approval, and we have to think carefully about how to merge culture, politics, economy, and military. It is impossible to merge into a country without going through this process for 10-20 years.

It is unlikely that the two countries will be unified now, but from an international perspective, the international community may not agree, and the various cultural differences between the people of the two countries will also make it more difficult to merge.

No, because the two countries are inconsistent in their cultural histories and religious beliefs, and the future economic development trends are not uniform.

The merger of the United States and Canada is not an unthinkable thing. Of course, I'm talking about annexation, not encroachment, and if the people of both countries want to do so, that's fine, because everything is based on popular will.

North America, let's first take a look at the basic data of the two countries: Canada covers an area of 10,000 square kilometers, ranking second in the world, with a population of 36.28 million and a total GDP of one trillion US dollars.

Canada and the United States have a territory of 9.63 million square kilometers, ranking third in the world, with a population of 100 million and a total GDP of trillion US dollars. If the two countries are reunified, they will surpass Russia in terms of area, reaching 19.6 million square kilometers. With a population of 100 million, it is second only to China and India.

With a GDP of $20 trillion, combined with an incomparably rich range of resources, Russia will remain the most powerful country in the world after the merger, and Russia will have no advantage.

A recent public opinion poll in the United States shows that about one-fifth of Canadians support the merger of the United States and Canada, and more than 70 percent oppose the merger.

Canadian landscape.

From the perspective of historical origins, Canada was originally a base of pro-British royalists, and during the American Revolutionary War, it opposed American independence, and its political system was very different from that of the United States, and its political concepts were also very different.

Canadian political districts.

However, since the beginning of the 20th century, with the First World War, World War II, the Cold War, etc., the United States, Britain and Canada have fought side by side, and their economic and social integration has become increasingly integrated. Therefore, as the world pattern changes in the future, the merger of the United States and Canada is not a dream.

United States and Canada.

At present, Canada's air defense mainly relies on the North American Air Defense and Space Defense Command of the United States, whose military spending only accounts for 5% of GDP, while the United States is close to 5 percent.

For example, the United Arab Emirates is composed of seven small partners, the most famous of which is Dubai, which claims to be the world's first tyrant, in fact, the UAE was not an independent country before, it used to belong to the Arab Empire, and there was no oil, it was robbed by the coastline, and Britain did not think about colonizing it before, except that the sand was salted fish, it was useless, but it was annoyed by pirates, so it was stunned, and then signed an agreement, that is, everyone should not rob, and Britain became their protectorate. In the sixties of the last century, Britain withdrew to help, and these countries that signed a non-robbery agreement with Britain established a union state, which was the first to discover oil in Abu Dhabi, and now Abu Dhabi is the most oil in this alliance country, Dubai's oil has long been exhausted, and there are some without oil, such as the member country Ajman, it has no oil, the economy of the member countries is independent, each lives its own life, of course no oil can not get rich, mainly rely on brother units to help.

In addition, there is also a Qatar that is now super rich, and dares to call out the entire Arab world, and wants to be the world's big brother, Qatar originally signed a peace agreement with Britain that year, but there was a lot of internal controversy, and finally withdrew from this alliance. The current Qatar can be said to be more beautiful than the United Arab Emirates, which has caused his brothers to break off diplomatic relations with him. looks like the sky is not afraid of the earth.

There is also Malaysia, Malaysia is called Malaysia, which is a combination of many British colonies, and Singapore was also one of them, but because Lee Kuan Yew was too fierce, people felt that if they joined forces with him, their base camp might be taken away by Lee, so they expelled Singapore, yes, Malaysia expelled Singapore, one of the four Asian tigers. Lee Kuan Yew was very pessimistic at the time, saying that if he was a predominantly Chinese country, if he could not stay under a large country, there would probably be no room for survival.

Fortunately, Singapore's development is still good.

Similar to the United Arab Emirates, there is also a rich oil-struck country that did not join Malaysia, and the country that Malaysia wanted to pull the most was Brunei, and in the end, the Sultan of Brunei did not agree, and now Brunei is super rich, especially the royal family, the top three lords of the world's royal family. It is said that the common people will give one million when they get married.

And there are many examples of the merger of the two countries in ancient times.

For example, the Kingdom of Poland and Lithuania is made up of Poland and Lithuania. At first, there was a common enemy, an alliance, and in the end, through marriage, the Grand Duke of Lithuania married the queen of Poland, and that was a family.

In the future, it is also possible that two countries will merge into one country, such as the Korean Peninsula, and historically, the general trend should still be one country, but it is difficult to say whether the south will eat the north or the north will eat the south.