Urgent! History examines the understanding of war and peace

War is a continuation of politics, and the justice of war, etc., is relative.

Peace is also relative.

History needs both peace and war, both of which play an equally important role in the evolution of human civilization. In times of peace, people live a stable life and are relatively rich in materials. So there was a section of people who came out to explore art and philosophy.

However, peace is also pregnant with war. Because in peacetime, the population grows faster. Population growth can lead to a lot of problems.

For example, the originally sufficient social production began to be insufficient, and the living environment gradually became crowded. In other words, the existing political system and economic model are no longer suitable for the continued development of mankind and need to be changed. But in a relatively backward past, even today, it is impossible to rely on negotiation for change.

This is because the change thinks that this will lead to the redistribution of the means of production, which will touch the vested interests, and the vested interests will show their obstruction. The only way to break the barriers and make change is through war. In fact, this is only one cause of war, that is, internal war.

There is also a war of aggression. A war of aggression does not need to distinguish whether the existing relations of production need to be changed or not, and the war of aggression is an active attack from the outside. Of course, the purpose of waging a war is to obtain benefits, which is undoubtedly a disaster for the invaded, but for its descendants, or to consider the war of aggression in the long history of the invaded, it is undoubtedly the most effective change.

For example, if it weren't for the Opium War, I would have had to live in a feudal society for many years. A little further, without Genghis Khan's invasion of Europe, Europe would not have had artillery so early. So there are two sides to everything.

What seems to be a brutal war actually carries the great responsibility of spreading civilization. Of course, this means that ordinary wars will promote the transformation of the society of the invaded people, and the civilization of the period will progress. This is not the case with some wars.

Marx said: "The domination of an advanced nation by a backward nation will inevitably lead to the retreat of civilization." "The Manchu invasion is a case in point. There was also the invasion of Athens by the Persian Empire BC, which led to the retreat of civilization to a certain extent.

This war of aggression has greatly promoted the development of productive forces and the transformation of production relations. As a result, it can maintain social peace for a longer time. This is the relationship between war and peace.

A, the hegemony of the United States. Hegemonism is an idea, but it does not necessarily have strength. Anyone and any country can have hegemonic ideas.

Vietnam also has hegemonist ideas, but it does not have the strength of hegemonism. Therefore, hegemonism cannot lead to war, but strength can lead to war. It's the same with people, if you can fight, but you don't bully people, and another person often bullies honest people, but he doesn't dare to bully you, so, for you, the world is safe and peaceful, and for those honest people who are bullied, the world is dark and warlike.

b, the multipolarity of the world. Whether it is a multipolar or unipolar world, it is a process, not a final outcome, and there will never be a final outcome.

d, the power of world peace. In fact, peace is shouting, since peace is called, then what are they developing the military for? People who think the world is peaceful are as stupid as they think it's safe to walk on the road at 12 o'clock in the middle of the night.

c. Changes in the international balance of power. The power of the world is constantly changing. When the world is in a period of peace, it is a process of recuperation and recuperation of various forces, a process of developing economic development, science and technology, and military development, and a process of quantitative change.

When one or more sides think that they can defeat their opponents, war will come, and this is a qualitative change.

Because the formation of today's world pattern is precisely the embodiment of the strength of international forces, the strong naturally occupy a dominant position, that is, the so-called "great power". The reason why the United States dominates the world is because it is backed by great strength. Therefore, changes in the balance of international power (strength and weakness) determine changes in the world pattern and are the root cause.

The root cause is that whoever dominates the world will have the right to speak.

A and D are both a kind of force, B is a trend, and the root cause is the ebb and flow of various forces.

It's the Cold War. The World Cold War Pattern in 1959 The Cold War in Europe during the Cold War (English: cold war, Russian:

It refers to the political and diplomatic confrontation, conflict and competition between the United States and the Soviet Union and their allies between 1945 and 1990s. Since the end of the Second World War, during this period, although the differences and conflicts were serious, both sides of the confrontation tried their best to avoid the outbreak of large-scale wars (world wars) on a worldwide scale, and their confrontations were usually carried out through "cold" methods such as local human wars, scientific and technological and arms races, and diplomatic competition, that is, "mutual containment, but no resort to force", so it was called "cold war".

The drastic changes in Eastern Europe and the collapse of the Soviet Union marked the end of the Cold War.

Geographically speaking, the United States is far away from Europe, and it is very difficult for the general flames of war to be drawn to the United States mainland, so long as the interests of the United States are not touched, the United States will of course sit on the mountain and watch the tiger fight, and obtain economic benefits from it. This cartoon vividly depicts this mentality of Americans.

War and peace are two different melodies in the development process of human society, and they are two sides of the same body in the state of social movements.

This question is so big, it won't be a general exam question.

？The question is a little unclear what it is asking ...

1. Shandong has been Chinese since ancient times, with Chinese compatriots, military strategy, transportation and the starting place of Chinese culture.

2. The reason why China did not recover Shandong: China's national strength was too weak and it was slaughtered by others, which led to the occurrence of the "May Fourth" Movement and caused the Beiyang warlords to lose their minds and fall

1 Shandong is the birthplace of Confucian culture and the gateway to Beijing 2 China's small influence in the world, its low status in the world, and the interference of foreign imperialism triggered the 54 Movement, which opened the prelude to the new democratic revolution

(2) The people of Shandong are an inseparable part of the Chinese nation; Shandong's important geographical location; Shandong is the birthplace of Chinese culture.

Harmful and oh red skin oho8ujeq9 dysmenorrhea.