Is it better to take a Polo 1 4AT or a Sidi 1 5 AT?

I also think it's good to take it, so I bought it myself.

What's more, Japanese cars, like the Japanese, are not leather.

Boycott Japanese products.

1. From the top of the day, city has certain advantages, about 10,000 yuan;

2. In terms of engine, each has its own advantages, and the advantage of City is that the displacement is slightly larger, but its valve structure SOHC is inferior to Polo's DOHC;

3. From the perspective of power, city has an advantage in terms of maximum power and torque;

4. From the perspective of gearbox, Polo has an advantage;

5. From the perspective of power assist type, POLO has advantages;

6. From the perspective of interior decoration, polo is more humane;

7. From the perspective of driving, Polo has an advantage;

8. From the perspective of security, POLO has obvious advantages;

To sum up, I personally suggest, don't be reluctant to spend 10,000 yuan more, maybe that's just your month's salary, buy polo!

Added: I also like polo in the following ways: support for *** and rearview mirror heating function, which is not available in the city.

I think it's polo that gets better.

It is equipped with a 6-speed automatic manual transmission. Automatically change manual during driving, and automatically adjust the gear according to the Zhao sensing speed. And vice versa. Switch freely.

2.Its beer is better both abroad and in China.

3.The safety is relatively strong in the average millimeter steel plate, laser welded body. Double-sided galvanized with steel sheets. of low drag coefficients. 11 paint technology, 12 years anti-corrosion.

4 bodies off a little you can check out Shanghai Volkswagen**.

No matter what it is compared to, no matter how it is compared, it must be better than Polo, and it is not a little better, I have absolutely no regrets about buying Polo, and it is very valuable to sell it after a few years.

I choose polo resolutely

Despise the Japanese and do not buy Japanese cars.

Look at that reference and you'll understand.

I also recommend buying Polo, although the Honda car is really good, but seeing so many Honda accidents, it is better to be careful of our little life!

Polo Jinqu is reliable in quality and excellent in performance.

Of course, it is good to have a penny for a single item.

My personal opinion is not to buy a Japanese car, Volkswagen's work and reputation are obvious to all.

Support the point of view of the "car researcher" upstairs.

I also had this doubt when I bought Polo. It is recommended to have a hand stop, automatic. Girls,It is recommended to have an automatic transmission,。

Polo still recommends buying a hatchback, which is enough.

If you look at other sedans, it's best to get on the A-class car.

It's not bad, but it's enough, of course. It's up to you. In terms of the performance of the car, there is not much difference...

The girl's words are still fine,

First of all. Eliminate the latter two. Rena has few after-sales service outlets.

Less market share. Logo 207 He has an older brother named 307, and this brother is very good, but it is not him after all. He has been relegated to the ranks of mini cars.

Fuel consumption is its weakness. And the appearance is really not complimentary. (Like a domestic Xiali).

Now let's talk about Polo and Fengfan.

Polo new car. It is the first of the four things about safety. After all, he is the eldest of the public.

A lot of benefits are available. Performance is also very good 6-speed shifting. It's a pity not like the Golf double clutch.

Ay. It's a pity. But still with the old TR gearbox but**, slightly higher.

After all, it's the masses).

Fengfan. First of all. If you don't have a complex to boycott Japanese products.

Performance is ok. On par with Polo. Fuel consumption is minimal.

The disadvantage is that the car is narrow, and Japanese cars are common problems. Lacquer thin. The steel plates of the A, B pillars are not as thick as the Bolo.

It depends on whether you open it for men or women. What is the approximate range of ** range? Below 11w?

The best trick to teach you is. Go down the road and take notes. See what cars appear most often.

Hope it will be useful to the landlord. (My family bought Tiida last year (old car, very classic.) Don't dislike. ))

Hello, I am Dongfeng Peugeot's official car purchase consultant.

Manufacturer**: 10,000.

The fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is about 6L, and the fuel consumption is low.

The 207 has undergone strict safety crash test and is safe and reliable.

The Peugeot 207 still uses the same engine as the 206 and the two engines, and the power performance is quite good. Available with 5-speed manual or tiptronic

4-speed manual automatic transmission. The new model has been upgraded and the engine emissions have been brought up to European standards. The 207 engine has a lot of torque output at low revs, and although the maximum power is only 56 kW, it revs 3400

The engine has reached a maximum torque of 120 Nm at r min.

You can click here to enquire about 207 or book a test drive.

Sign 207 Good! Fuel economy, technology is not advanced, but it is stable! The performance horsepower is higher than that of the same price range! Safe and secure 4-star certification in Europe1!!

I think it's better to polo, because polo is more stable to drive, and the body is laser welded to be stronger, and it is not floating at high speed.

In terms of fuel consumption, technology and performance, I think it is a hallmark.

Recommend polo. At present, POLO has launched the best Jinqing and Jintake. The question you ask is probably considering buying a sedan.

That's the contrast between Sidi and Jintori. The two cars have one thing in common, which is that they are currently all "facelifted" models. The configuration will not be repeated.

I would like to focus on the quality of Polo. At present, the POLO can be said to integrate many advanced technologies of Volkswagen, such as CAN BUS LAN, laser welding body, and even the front windshield is directly spliced without any fixing parts, which can be seen in the manufacturing process. Moreover, the strength of Shanghai Volkswagen must be stronger than that of Guangzhou Honda.

I think even if the maintenance cost of polo is more expensive, but you don't need to repair the car to run back and forth, while saving time and some costs. For the engine, Honda's engine may be more fuel-efficient, but at the same time there is a loss of power, which is a matter of opinion. In addition, safety is also one aspect, in terms of body manufacturing process, Polo's advanced chassis system can better protect the safety of its members, and it is also among the best in the NCAP crash score.

At this point, we must believe in the accumulation of experience in German man-made cars.

Considering safety, the first pass is the Fit, the two-box FIT is unstable at high speed, the Japanese car absorbs energy, and the safety of the rear row is worrying. The three-box fit Sidi has a trunk as an energy-absorbing area, which is safer and more usable, but the disadvantage is that it looks a little weird. If the main consideration is fuel consumption, it is recommended to think di

Secondly, it is recommended to be aggressive, the real city fuel consumption is around, higher than the Japanese, but the safety is better, because the body structure strength is high, known as the small tank.

Lefeng fuel consumption is similar to Polo, but the safety is poor, and the advantage is that it is very cheap and easy to start.

If you have a lot of money, you can consider Enterprising or Vios.

First of all, help the landlord pass three cars: polo (cost-effective), Lefeng (small space), Sidi (a little ugly).

Let's focus on the Fit and Vios. These two cars are also Toyota Honda's previous competitive models, let's talk about Vios first, the overall feeling of this car is still relatively rounded, the lines are also good, the interior space is also good, the fuel consumption of the new Vios engine is also good, about 6 oil, about 12 seconds per 100 kilometers, and the speed can be accelerated for small displacement. However, its handling is average, the road feeling is relatively blurred, and the steering machine is biased towards comfort, and in corners, the body of the Vios shakes and rolls greatly.

Fit is divided into hatchback and sedan, don't consider the sedan here, ugly, the hatchback is still full of beautiful, ** and fuel consumption are relatively low, now the new Fit interior is also more beautiful, to ensure that you can see it at a glance, but the brakes are a little soft, in order to pursue the space seat is slightly thinner, its economy and power are also good, it is recommended to consider.

As for safety, safety is in personal awareness, and the configuration on the car is almost the same, and active safety is the most important.

Polo takes fuel consumption of 5 liters.

Lefeng fuel consumption rises.

Vios fuel consumption liters.

Fit fuel consumption liters.

The fuel consumption of the company is 5 liters.

The security is pretty much the same.

Personally, I like polo Jinto.

Small fuel consumption, good appearance, fair price, excellent safety should belong to the Fit or Vios, the problem is that if you like the sedan, choose the Vios, the hatchback Fit is very good.

The actual fuel consumption is the car propaganda in the addition of the left. Let's choose a German Volkswagen car first, and the safety factor should be higher. Repair and maintenance are also convenient, after all, now the Chinese people use the most Volkswagen cars, I believe in the masses, from the annual sales of Volkswagen can be seen!

It's not so bad!! Because I boycotted Japanese products, I bought polo. Wait a minute, next year the new Golf will be produced in China by FAW-Volkswagen!! It's definitely great!!

The fuel consumption of Japanese cars is relatively low, and the Fit and Sidi only have 6 fuel, the Vios need 7, the Lefeng needs about 8, and the Polo is about 7. It should be said that Lefeng's engine is the worst one, which is recognized by everyone. In terms of safety, German cars must be the first choice, Polo is definitely the first, and Japanese cars are almost the same.

Polo's safety is not bad, and it also received a good score of 4 stars in the NCAP crash.

Volkswagen, of course! Needless to say! Polo I've driven and it's very good to drive.

Just look at the Elantra, the Jetta is the technology of the 80s, and the power and torque Jetta have the upper hand, but the Elantra just can't outrun the Jetta, what does it mean? In other words, when the Germans were making cars, the bosses of Korean car companies didn't know what a car was!

The Korean ones are not very good, and they are not as good as the domestic Chery's autonomous cars, if you are the two, it will be Volkswagen.

Needless to ask, it must be the public

In terms of safety, there is not much difference between the two, in terms of detail workmanship, Polo is slightly better, and the interior space of the car is slightly larger than the Swift.

I tend to polo because I always feel that what the Japanese give to the Chinese is their inferior. Hehe.

Power, engine technology, interior, Swift dominates.

Gearbox technology, wheelbase, workmanship, safety, Polo is better, the Swift will look better However, the 2010 Polo is beautiful, but I still believe that the German car is better than the Japanese one.

POLO is strong and durable, swift economy and fuel saving, **POLO is expensive, cost-effective swift is high.

Each has its own benefits The landlord must be a lady Hehe It is recommended that you buy polo The reputation of the public is not comparable to Suzuki.

Polo no regrets in the choice. The whole vehicle is laser welded, and it is equipped with 4 airbags.

In the past, the Polo was divided into hatchback and sedan.

Later, after the facelift, it was called the strength of the hatchback and the strength of the sedan.

The original polo has been discontinued, and now the new car can only be bought with Jinqing or Jinto, compared to the previous in addition to the appearance and internal configuration of the small changes to the engine has also changed, the previous engine has no variable valve technology or anything (I don't know the specifics), so there is a saying that it is better to buy than to buy.

In 2006 Volkswagen made a change so definitely better than good.