I found my problem. I have a question

Introverted but cheerful? Is that so? Your account is vague, so I'm just guessing.

Let's not discuss your personality or anything, anyway, people with any personality and temperament can have normal social interactions, and it doesn't matter.

In fact, the most important points in the process of interacting with people are a few things.

Express your kindness, praise the other person properly, build trust, find common ground or topics of interest.

It sounds like a rigid sound, but it's actually very easy and everybody uses it.

Even a simple sentence can be expressed.

Hello, it's been prettier lately, oh, I can help you keep an eye out, there's a good new movie coming out recently.

And so on, many words are very daily, but in fact, they are all expressions and applications of the above points.

Talking goes through the brain, but you don't have to say anything, everything is calculated, if it's a chat, as long as it's suitable, the more casual the better, if you want to, you can talk to me

I think you're in love with other girls.,Stranger.,What are you afraid of?,When you talk to him, you can see it.,Don't say anything if you don't care about it.。。 Others are listening, it means that it can be ha, alas. I don't know how to do it, the key is my own courage, to see if I have the courage to say, even if others can't you.

Then let's start with all aspects, find common ground, and if you have something to say, you won't be passive, and besides, there are still some strangers who don't like to communicate by nature, and it's not effective if you're very positive...

I'd like to ask you a question.

No, it's too well-behaved, it's okay, just do something you think a man will do, and don't play with girls just because there are too many girls.

Probably not, it's just that you're more literary.

No, it's just that you think.

No, it's a psychological problem.

Caused by the growth environment. Some saved.

What about the girls in your class? Guys, aren't they?

What are you going to experiment with in this experimental class?

I feel like it's a logical circular paradox, because when I'm trying to solve your problem, you don't tell me what your problem is, but you ask me, if it were me, what would I do, and that again requires me to think about your problem, not my original problem, but what is your problem? Is it what you call a puzzle? No, it's my problem, that's my problem.

This comes back to my question, completing the cycle, and so on, without end. In this process, you unconsciously change the "whose problem" twice, that is, the so-called "meta-object" in logic, can make the proposition return, and because of this, the circular paradox is even more fascinating.

If you have to ask me your question, I will ask you, what is your problem A? If you are the problem in front of you, I will continue to ask, what is your problem A? And so on, not because I'm verbose, it's because you're using binary language while conveying a ridiculous message – you didn't even ask!