The Qing Dynasty s closed policy was not good, is today s open policy too much? 5

Updated on history 2024-04-09
26 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    How did you get by???

    First of all, whether the policy is good or not, I think it is necessary to take the people's life as the standard, you say that your policy is good, you can't eat enough in the country, you can't eat enough, and the rest is not to be discussed, how good can it be?

    In addition, the superstructure of viewpoints and cultural relics is based on the economic foundation, if your views and cultural relics have their own charm, which is conducive to people's lives, and can withstand the test and impact of the times, they do not need special protection, but will be further developed under the integration of various cultures. If your views and cultural relics are themselves dross and hinder the development of society, even if you take precautions day and night, and order them to be protected, it will only be a matter of surviving.

    Although there are many shortcomings in the current opening-up policy, such as the low competitiveness of state-owned enterprises due to protection, opening-up is the trend of the times, and opening-up is a process that will inevitably experience pain, and the key is how to minimize the "painful cost" and develop healthily.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It's not that it's too much, it's still far from enough, the earth has changed villages, and only by fully communicating and competing can China catch up in an all-round way, at least not too far behind. If you fall behind, you will be beaten. However, the key is to have a good system that can give full play to the initiative of the people of the whole country.

    Otherwise, if you draw a dog according to a cat and a tiger, the gap will get bigger and bigger after a long time.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Hello friends: China's current policy of reform and opening up has not been the same, because China is now opening itself up to the greatest extent on the premise of maintaining territorial and sovereign integrity, so that the world can understand China and have more exchanges with China. However, China in the Qing Dynasty was forced to open up to the European and American powers on the basis of losing power and humiliating the country, so the opening up of the Qing Dynasty is not the same concept at all.

    Welcome my answer, thank you for your support.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Of course, retreat is not good, it makes Qing ** isolated from the world and gradually fall behind.

    It is true that the national style is not too strong now, but it is not the fault of openness, but the fact that people have not grasped it well. The opening up of the Tang Dynasty is well known, but it did not cause the culture of the Tang Dynasty to be scattered, but to become famous abroad.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Culture is not static. With the passage of time, some cultures have disappeared, and some have been passed down since ancient times.

    It does not mean that when the culture is opened, it will be replaced by the culture of other countries, but it will continue to blend.

    Throughout history, the times when our culture flourished were the most open. Such as: Tang and Song Dynasty.

    If we don't open up, our culture may remain unchanged in a short period of time, but in the long run, I am afraid that not only our culture, but also our nation will be replaced.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It is not a problem that cannot be passed, but that people's ideological concepts have changed, believing that foreign objects are good, while their own people are backward and cannot keep up with the trend of the times.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    I think there is nothing wrong with opening up, but in the process of opening up, some of China's traditional culture has been impacted by Western civilization, and some of the values of people are now greatly influenced by the West, which has led to the prevalence of some fashions.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    There are many people who have begun to reflect (including you), which means that there is actually no such thing.

    Secondly, every culture has its own vitality, and under the test of the times, what should stay and what should go will go, just like nature's selection of species. Too much interference can be useless. And some of them are really meaningful, the times require him to stay, and some of us have begun to pay attention to him, isn't it just a means for the times to leave him.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It's not that it's over, it's just that some people's minds are too "open" than before. Forget your roots.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    There may be a lot of bad things, but often while absorbing the essence, it also brings in the dross, which is inevitable and normal, and it depends on how to balance this next. It's like a bit of digitalis effect, and a little overkill is not a way, it's also necessary.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    We should look at it from a dialectical point of view, because the policy of closing off has actually played a role in resisting foreign enemies, and today's policy of opening up will actually be a kind of shock, depending on whether our nation can integrate into the world.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The reason for the Kangxi period of the Qing Dynasty, the Qing Dynasty once opened the country, but the wind and grass outside made the emperor panic. Closed policy", otherwise their economic base will be hit by capitalism...It's a bit more complicated.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Reform and opening up is right, but Grandpa Deng overestimated the quality of the Chinese people...

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    There's no way to ...... itPowerless ......

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Look at history, we are returning to history.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Even if the Qing Dynasty did not close the country, it would not be possible to continue to survive, after all, the collapse of the Qing Dynasty was not caused by the closure of the country, but because they were too corrupt, and China would still develop into what it is now.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    China may enter the developed countries ahead of schedule, people's living standards and education quality will be greatly improved, and scientific research and technology will be more perfect.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    If the Qing Dynasty had not implemented its policy of seclusion, China would probably be the most powerful country in the world today, and it would have been able to avoid being bullied by foreign countries.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    Then China is likely to become the world's number one power, after all, we have a good foundation.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    The reasons for the Qing Dynasty's foreign policy of closing the country to the outside world:

    The fundamental reason is that the self-sufficient natural economy of feudal society is relatively stable, and the Qing ** believes that there is no need to cooperate with foreign countries**.

    In order to combat Zheng Chenggong and other coastal anti-Qing forces.

    In order to defend against the invasion of Western countries.

    Manifestations:

    In the early years of the Qing Dynasty, a strict "sea ban" policy was implemented, prohibiting merchants from going to sea.

    During the Qianlong period, only one place in Guangzhou was opened, and regulations and regulations restricting foreign business activities and domestic businessmen going to sea were promulgated, forming a strict policy of closing the country to the outside world.

    Impact:

    Positive impact

    To a certain extent, rampant maritime smuggling and piracy have been combated and restricted.

    It has played a positive role in the stability of the coastal areas.

    It played a certain role in self-defense against the aggressive activities of Western colonialists.

    Negative effects

    The long-term implementation of this policy has hindered Sino-foreign ties, affected China's absorption of advanced culture and science and technology, isolated China from the rest of the world, and seriously hindered the budding development of capitalism. It has derailed China from the world and slowly fallen behind the world.

    Culturally, economically, and scientifically, it is impossible to integrate with the world, and it is difficult to develop various advanced technological ideas, and the phenomenon of imperial twilight is presented as a whole. It is one of the important reasons for the backwardness and beating of modern China.

    It also reduces the opportunity for contact with the outside world. hinder the country's economic development and completely lose the initiative in foreign countries. Blocking scientific, technological, and cultural exchanges with foreign countries, and even hindering the development of productive forces and social progress.

    causing international conflicts. Influence the development of social science and technology. It restricts the development of foreign affairs and navigation.

    The Revelation of Closing the Country:

    1. We must insist on opening up to the outside world and oppose self-isolation;

    2. Don't be complacent, absorb the advantages and strengths of others;

    3. It is necessary to promote reform and development and conform to the development trend of the times;

    4. Develop the country's socialist economy and improve its overall strength.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    There were several reasons for the Qing Dynasty's foreign policy of seclusion, the most important of which was that the Qing rulers believed that foreign cultures and ideas would harm China's traditional culture and political system. The feudal ruling class of the Qing Dynasty attached great importance to the maintenance of its own rule, and therefore also considered it a threat to them from domestic and foreign cultural contacts. In addition, the Qing Dynasty's feudal society had relatively low productivity, and opening up to the outside world could lead to the inability of domestic goods to compete, which in turn affected the country's economic interests.

    Finally, the Qing Dynasty experienced many wars and internal and external troubles, and the fear of foreign forces was also one of the important reasons for the policy of closing the country to the outside world.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    1757-1840, a total of 4 years.

    In the 18th century, due to the increasingly frequent exchanges between China and foreign countries and the continuous occurrence of people's anti-Qing uprisings, the Qing rulers feared that outsiders and Han Chinese would unite against the Qing Dynasty. In 1717, the Qing Dynasty ordered that Chinese merchant ships should not be allowed to conduct in the South Seas under the control of the Europeans. At the same time, the Qing Dynasty imposed restrictions on the scope of religion and banned religion to reduce exchanges between China and foreign countries.

    At the end of the 17th century, the Qing Dynasty allowed Catholicism to spread in China. As the church's influence in China expanded, it began to directly interfere in China's internal affairs. In particular, in 1704, Pope Clement XI signed a "forbidden treaty", prohibiting Chinese believers from worshiping Confucius and worshipping their ancestors.

    Kangxi sternly rejected this request. In 1720, the Qing Dynasty began to implement a policy of banning religion. In 1727, it was clearly stipulated that foreign merchant ships could only go to Humen in Guangdong and Xiamen in Fujian.

    In 1757, the policy of seclusion was officially implemented, and the Qianlong Emperor announced that Western merchant ships were allowed to anchor at Humen in Guangdong**.

    The Qing Dynasty implemented a policy of seclusion and built a wall separating China and the rest of the world, which played an impediment role in the progress of Chinese society. Due to the restrictions on going to sea, the economic development has been seriously affected. At the same time, it also isolated the Chinese people from the world trend and did not know the general trend of the world, and the Qing rulers closed their eyes and listened, and the result was just as Wei Yuan said

    A country that has been in affairs for 200 years does not know its location or its separation. ”

    In 1840, the British invaders finally opened the gates of China with artillery.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    In 1757, the policy of seclusion was officially implemented, and Guangzhou became the only treaty port.

    In 1840, the British invaders finally opened the door of China with cannons, and the policy of closing the country to the outside world naturally collapsed, and in 1842, the "Treaty of Nanjing", "Guangsha Funingshang", and the five ports of commerce. After this, the gates of the Qing Dynasty gradually opened. The Qing Dynasty's full-scale retreat was not very long.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    1. Implementation.

    copy reason:

    1) The Qing Dynasty Bai rulers practiced "emphasizing the original and suppressing the last".

    du policy, despising the development of non-governmental zhi industry and commerce.

    2) Self-sufficiency gives a natural economy stability, and the ruler does not see the need to interact with foreign countries.

    3) The expansion of Western colonizers, the Qing rulers feared that their territorial sovereignty would be violated by foreign countries, and they were afraid that the coastal people's exchanges with foreign countries would threaten their own rule.

    2. Influence: 1) Positive: It has played a little self-defense role in the aggressive activities of Western colonizers.

    2) Negative: The Qing Dynasty was closed off from the world, isolated from the world, could not see the changes in the world situation, and failed to learn advanced scientific knowledge and technology from the West in a timely manner, so that China gradually fell behind in the world.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    "Closed off the country" policy bai

    It refers to the Qing Dynasty's strict restrictions on foreign exchanges and political dao

    Plan. This kind of political version.

    The reasons for this are manifold.

    1. The need of the rulers of the Qing Dynasty to maintain feudal rule was the direct cause of "closing the country to the outside world".

    2. The feudal self-sufficient natural economy is relatively stable and has a strong resistance to foreign commodities, which is the economic root cause of the policy of closing the country to the outside world.

    3. The need for Qing rule. In order to prevent the connection between Chinese and foreign anti-Qing forces and the infiltration of Western colonialism, the Qing rulers implemented a policy of seclusion and seclusion.

    Although the policy of closing the country to the outside world has a certain self-defense effect against the invasion of Western colonialists for a certain period of time, it is, after all, a passive and backward policy. Because the policy of closing the country can not weaken the strength of the Western capitalist countries, but hinders their own development, so that China loses the initiative in foreign countries, the rulers due to the restrictions of the times and the needs of feudal rule, cut off the exchange of science and technology and culture between China and foreign countries, hinder the development of productive forces and social progress, widen the gap between China and the West, resulting in a situation in which modern China is passively beaten.

    There are certain positive and negative aspects to the seclusion.

    Positive: There was a certain self-defense effect against the invasion of Western colonizers.

    Negative: The Qing Dynasty was isolated from the world, could not see the changes in the world situation, and failed to learn advanced scientific knowledge and production technology from the West in a timely manner, so that China gradually fell behind in the world.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    Policy: "Heavy copy and suppress the last".

    or "heavy agriculture and suppression of business".

    Reason: The ruler of the Qin Dynasty adhered to the traditional concept of agriculture-oriented, and implemented the concept of "emphasizing the foundation and suppressing the end".

    policies to suppress and restrict the development of private industry and commerce.

    Impact: The Qing Dynasty closed itself off from the outside world, hindered the development and progress of the handicraft industry, isolated from the world, could not see the changes in the world situation, and failed to learn advanced scientific knowledge and production technology from the West in a timely manner, and China gradually fell behind in the world.

Related questions
17 answers2024-04-09

There are pros and cons! Clear**.

The policy of closing the country to the outside world was implemented for nearly 200 years, and it played a certain role in self-defense against the aggressive activities of the Western colonizers at that time. However, at that time in Western countries. >>>More

14 answers2024-04-09

Aixin Jueluo - Hongli, that is, Qing Gaozong - Qianlong Emperor. >>>More

15 answers2024-04-09

Before the Opium War, the Qing Dynasty restricted and prohibited foreign traffic. Retreat is not a complete abstinence, but is mainly manifested in the imposition of strict restrictions on **. The activities of the public bank merchants who are restricted to trade in Guangzhou and foreign businessmen who come to China must pass the Qing Dynasty are limited to a specified scope, and the import goods are subject to high taxes, and the varieties and quantities of export goods are restricted. >>>More

10 answers2024-04-09

This brings us to the huge difference between China and European countries at that time. China is a vast country with a very high degree of self-sufficiency. The proportion of foreign ** in the entire national economy is very low. >>>More

6 answers2024-04-09

There are generally two sides to work, so there are some good aspects to be seen in many traditional bad guys. Although the seclusion of the country was not suitable for the development of the times, and thus accelerated the decline of the Qing Dynasty, on the other hand, there were positive aspects. >>>More