Ask for the document 2010 Civil Law Exam Syllabus

For the judicial examination, we generally recommend that you have a set of textbooks, the "Famous Teacher's Handout" of the three schools is good, the three schools of law are also recommended, and the compass is also good. The past questions are recommended for the past questions of the three schools, and Zhang Nengbao can also classify the past questions. It is also possible to prepare a set of 13 years for the three major proposals, and there are the following on the Internet.

Review the exam, go to the bookstore to buy three major books, laws and regulations, past questions, and then buy a copy of the online course review of the 98 exam, I have passed, and the above materials are used in the review. I hope it will be helpful to you, and if you don't understand, you can ask.

I took the bar exam in September '10 and prepared the following materials:

1. Three major books;

2. Compilation of laws and regulations;

3. Seven special lectures on all nations; (At present, the special lectures of Zhonghe Education are good) 4. Seven books of past question analysis; (I was using Zhang Baolai at the time).

5. A copy of past papers (a complete set of volumes);

6. A number of international courseware and handouts. (But recently, when I listened to those courseware occasionally last year, I felt that the lecture was not as good as what I taught at that time) I didn't report to the tutoring class of Wanguo at that time, and these materials were given by my buddies.

If you prepare according to these, read the three major books twice from now on, read the laws and regulations twice (these two have laid a good foundation in the first review, so you should read them first), and then read them at any time during the process of doing the questions in the future; Read the special lecture and the analysis of the past questions three times (watch these two at the same time, and do the real questions when you are tired of watching the special lectures); Read the courseware handouts twice (interspersed with listening and watching throughout the review process); The real questions of the whole set of papers should be done according to the requirements of the judicial exam, and then the wrong questions will be dealt with intensively, and you will get 400+. At that time, I made a review plan similar to the above, you can make your own plan according to your schedule, three rounds of review are enough, the first round is no more than a month and a half, the second round is about two months, the third round of review of the key points, and then do the whole set of exam papers. If there is still time, check and fill in the gaps.

I got 410+

Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases.

Article 3: Where two or more persons cause harm to others with joint intent or joint negligence, or where there is no joint intent or joint negligence, but the same harmful consequences occur directly in conjunction with their infringing acts, it constitutes joint infringement and shall bear joint and several liability in accordance with article 130 of the General Principles of the Civil Law. Where two or more persons do not have joint intent or joint negligence, but several acts carried out by them indirectly combine to produce the same harmful consequence, they shall each bear corresponding liability for compensation based on the degree of negligence or the proportion of causal force.

I believe that there is joint infringement. Because they are all at fault, and their faults are combined to cause infringement, it is a direct combination. Because it is difficult to divide the size of the fault in direct union, it is necessary to assume joint and several succession for the sake of protection of the victim.

The chapter on traffic accident liability of the Tort Liability Law, check it yourself.

I think your analysis is correct.

I don't know why the answer is so, maybe it comes down to "common dangerous behavior"?

Indeed, this should be a joint cause, not a cumulative cause.

You don't think A and B can cause all the damage alone, so what harm do you think A caused and what harm did B cause? It is difficult to distinguish the responsibility of A and B for their acts, and for the protection of victim C, A and B are jointly and severally liable for C, and then A and B divide the responsibility internally.

The outline has not yet come out, you can take a look at the 2012 edition, or pay attention to Xinhua Examination in real time, there is the latest information, good luck.

You can go to the legal website to pay attention to the latest information of the judicial examination, and the syllabus of the judicial examination will be announced when it comes out, and you will know it for the first time, and now you can learn about the current study plan first.